jojo/models/actions/pre_execution_errors_test.go

153 lines
5.4 KiB
Go
Raw Permalink Normal View History

// Copyright 2025 The Forgejo Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
package actions
import (
"testing"
"forgejo.org/modules/translation"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
)
func TestTranslatePreExecutionError(t *testing.T) {
translation.InitLocales(t.Context())
lang := translation.NewLocale("en-US")
tests := []struct {
name string
run *ActionRun
expected string
}{
{
name: "legacy",
run: &ActionRun{PreExecutionError: "legacy message"},
expected: "legacy message",
},
{
name: "no error",
run: &ActionRun{},
expected: "",
},
{
name: "ErrorCodeEventDetectionError",
run: &ActionRun{
PreExecutionErrorCode: ErrorCodeEventDetectionError,
PreExecutionErrorDetails: []any{"inner error message"},
},
expected: "Unable to parse supported events in workflow: inner error message",
},
{
name: "ErrorCodeJobParsingError",
run: &ActionRun{
PreExecutionErrorCode: ErrorCodeJobParsingError,
PreExecutionErrorDetails: []any{"inner error message"},
},
expected: "Unable to parse jobs in workflow: inner error message",
},
{
name: "ErrorCodePersistentIncompleteMatrix",
run: &ActionRun{
PreExecutionErrorCode: ErrorCodePersistentIncompleteMatrix,
PreExecutionErrorDetails: []any{"blocked_job", "needs-1, needs-2"},
},
expected: "Unable to evaluate `strategy.matrix` of job blocked_job due to a `needs` expression that was invalid. It may reference a job that is not in it's 'needs' list (needs-1, needs-2), or an output that doesn't exist on one of those jobs.",
},
fix(actions): improve errors when `${{ needs... }}` is used in `strategy.matrix` incorrectly (#10298) Three fixes are presented together in this PR: - When a `strategy.matrix` entry in an Action job contains `${{ needs.some-job.outputs.some-output }}`, if that output *never* becomes available, different error messages will be presented if `some-job` isn't found or if `some-output` isn't found. This clarifies an error message that was previously "it could be this, or it could be this". - In the error case described in the previous point, other jobs in the workflow could continue running or could be left "blocked" forever. A centralized `FailRunPreExecutionError` function ensures that all incomplete jobs in the run are failed in this case. - In a rare error case when a job referenced another job in `strategy.matrix` but no other jobs were defined in the workflow, the job would be marked as blocked forever because the `job_emitter` code would never be invoked to detect this case. A new `consistencyCheckRun` function for a newly created `ActionRun` adds a location to perform a pre-execution check for this case so that the run can be failed. These fixes are all interconnected around the refactor for the `FailRunPreExecutionError`, causing them to be bundled rather than individual PRs. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - These are fixes to an unreleased feature and don't require release notes. - [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10298 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
2025-12-05 17:17:37 +01:00
{
name: "ErrorCodeIncompleteMatrixMissingOutput",
run: &ActionRun{
PreExecutionErrorCode: ErrorCodeIncompleteMatrixMissingOutput,
PreExecutionErrorDetails: []any{"blocked_job", "other_job", "some_output"},
},
feat: support reusable workflow expansion when `with` or `strategy.matrix` contains ${{ needs... }} (#10647) This change allows the `with:` field of a reusable workflow to reference a previous job, such as `with: { some-input: "${{ needs.other-job.outputs.other-output }}" }`. `strategy.matrix` can also reference `${{ needs... }}`. When a job is parsed and encounters this situation, the outer job of the workflow is marked with a field `incomplete_with` (or `incomplete_matrix`), indicating to Forgejo that it can't be executed as-is and the other jobs in its `needs` list need to be completed first. And then in `job_emitter.go` when one job is completed, it checks if other jobs had a `needs` reference to it and unblocks those jobs -- but if they're marked with `incomplete_with` then they can be sent back through the job parser, with the now-available job outputs, to be expanded into the correct definition of the job. The core functionality for this already exists to allow `runs-on` and `strategy.matrix` to reference the outputs of other jobs, but it is expanded upon here to include `with` for reusable workflows. There is one known defect in this implementation, but it has a limited scope -- if this code path is used to expand a nested reusable workflow, then the `${{ input.... }}` context will be incorrect. This will require an update to the jobparser in runner version 12.4.0, and so it is out-of-scope of this PR. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). - **end-to-end test:** will require the noted "known defect" to be resolved, but tests are authored at https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/compare/main...mfenniak:expand-reusable-workflows-needs ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10647 Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
2025-12-31 19:04:35 +01:00
expected: "Unable to evaluate `strategy.matrix` of job blocked_job: job other_job is missing output some_output.",
fix(actions): improve errors when `${{ needs... }}` is used in `strategy.matrix` incorrectly (#10298) Three fixes are presented together in this PR: - When a `strategy.matrix` entry in an Action job contains `${{ needs.some-job.outputs.some-output }}`, if that output *never* becomes available, different error messages will be presented if `some-job` isn't found or if `some-output` isn't found. This clarifies an error message that was previously "it could be this, or it could be this". - In the error case described in the previous point, other jobs in the workflow could continue running or could be left "blocked" forever. A centralized `FailRunPreExecutionError` function ensures that all incomplete jobs in the run are failed in this case. - In a rare error case when a job referenced another job in `strategy.matrix` but no other jobs were defined in the workflow, the job would be marked as blocked forever because the `job_emitter` code would never be invoked to detect this case. A new `consistencyCheckRun` function for a newly created `ActionRun` adds a location to perform a pre-execution check for this case so that the run can be failed. These fixes are all interconnected around the refactor for the `FailRunPreExecutionError`, causing them to be bundled rather than individual PRs. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - These are fixes to an unreleased feature and don't require release notes. - [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10298 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
2025-12-05 17:17:37 +01:00
},
{
name: "ErrorCodeIncompleteMatrixMissingJob",
run: &ActionRun{
PreExecutionErrorCode: ErrorCodeIncompleteMatrixMissingJob,
PreExecutionErrorDetails: []any{"blocked_job", "other_job", "needs-1, needs-2"},
},
expected: "Unable to evaluate `strategy.matrix` of job blocked_job: job other_job is not in the `needs` list of job blocked_job (needs-1, needs-2).",
},
feat(actions): support referencing `${{ needs... }}` variables in `runs-on` (#10308) Allows referencing the outputs of previously executed jobs in the `runs-on` field directly by a `${{ needs.some-job.outputs.some-output }}`, and also *indirectly* through the job's `strategy.matrix`. At its most complicated, supports a workflow with dynamic matrices like this: ```yaml jobs: define-matrix: runs-on: docker outputs: array-value: ${{ steps.define.outputs.array }} steps: - id: define run: | echo 'array=["debian-bookworm", "debian-trixie"]' >> "$FORGEJO_OUTPUT" runs-on-dynamic-matrix: needs: define-matrix strategy: matrix: my-runners: ${{ fromJSON(needs.define-matrix.outputs.array-value) }} runs-on: ${{ matrix.my-runners }} steps: - run: uname -a ``` ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. - Documentation already (incorrectly) states that `jobs.<job-id>.runs-on` can access the `needs` context. 😛 https://forgejo.org/docs/latest/user/actions/reference/#availability ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Features - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10308): <!--number 10308 --><!--line 0 --><!--description ZmVhdChhY3Rpb25zKTogc3VwcG9ydCByZWZlcmVuY2luZyBgJHt7IG5lZWRzLi4uIH19YCB2YXJpYWJsZXMgaW4gYHJ1bnMtb25g-->feat(actions): support referencing `${{ needs... }}` variables in `runs-on`<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10308 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
2025-12-05 18:14:43 +01:00
{
name: "ErrorCodeIncompleteMatrixUnknownCause",
run: &ActionRun{
PreExecutionErrorCode: ErrorCodeIncompleteMatrixUnknownCause,
PreExecutionErrorDetails: []any{"blocked_job"},
},
expected: "Unable to evaluate `strategy.matrix` of job blocked_job: unknown error.",
},
{
name: "ErrorCodeIncompleteRunsOnMissingOutput",
run: &ActionRun{
PreExecutionErrorCode: ErrorCodeIncompleteRunsOnMissingOutput,
PreExecutionErrorDetails: []any{"blocked_job", "other_job", "some_output"},
},
feat: support reusable workflow expansion when `with` or `strategy.matrix` contains ${{ needs... }} (#10647) This change allows the `with:` field of a reusable workflow to reference a previous job, such as `with: { some-input: "${{ needs.other-job.outputs.other-output }}" }`. `strategy.matrix` can also reference `${{ needs... }}`. When a job is parsed and encounters this situation, the outer job of the workflow is marked with a field `incomplete_with` (or `incomplete_matrix`), indicating to Forgejo that it can't be executed as-is and the other jobs in its `needs` list need to be completed first. And then in `job_emitter.go` when one job is completed, it checks if other jobs had a `needs` reference to it and unblocks those jobs -- but if they're marked with `incomplete_with` then they can be sent back through the job parser, with the now-available job outputs, to be expanded into the correct definition of the job. The core functionality for this already exists to allow `runs-on` and `strategy.matrix` to reference the outputs of other jobs, but it is expanded upon here to include `with` for reusable workflows. There is one known defect in this implementation, but it has a limited scope -- if this code path is used to expand a nested reusable workflow, then the `${{ input.... }}` context will be incorrect. This will require an update to the jobparser in runner version 12.4.0, and so it is out-of-scope of this PR. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). - **end-to-end test:** will require the noted "known defect" to be resolved, but tests are authored at https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/compare/main...mfenniak:expand-reusable-workflows-needs ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10647 Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
2025-12-31 19:04:35 +01:00
expected: "Unable to evaluate `runs-on` of job blocked_job: job other_job is missing output some_output.",
feat(actions): support referencing `${{ needs... }}` variables in `runs-on` (#10308) Allows referencing the outputs of previously executed jobs in the `runs-on` field directly by a `${{ needs.some-job.outputs.some-output }}`, and also *indirectly* through the job's `strategy.matrix`. At its most complicated, supports a workflow with dynamic matrices like this: ```yaml jobs: define-matrix: runs-on: docker outputs: array-value: ${{ steps.define.outputs.array }} steps: - id: define run: | echo 'array=["debian-bookworm", "debian-trixie"]' >> "$FORGEJO_OUTPUT" runs-on-dynamic-matrix: needs: define-matrix strategy: matrix: my-runners: ${{ fromJSON(needs.define-matrix.outputs.array-value) }} runs-on: ${{ matrix.my-runners }} steps: - run: uname -a ``` ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. - Documentation already (incorrectly) states that `jobs.<job-id>.runs-on` can access the `needs` context. 😛 https://forgejo.org/docs/latest/user/actions/reference/#availability ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Features - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10308): <!--number 10308 --><!--line 0 --><!--description ZmVhdChhY3Rpb25zKTogc3VwcG9ydCByZWZlcmVuY2luZyBgJHt7IG5lZWRzLi4uIH19YCB2YXJpYWJsZXMgaW4gYHJ1bnMtb25g-->feat(actions): support referencing `${{ needs... }}` variables in `runs-on`<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10308 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
2025-12-05 18:14:43 +01:00
},
{
name: "ErrorCodeIncompleteRunsOnMissingJob",
run: &ActionRun{
PreExecutionErrorCode: ErrorCodeIncompleteRunsOnMissingJob,
PreExecutionErrorDetails: []any{"blocked_job", "other_job", "needs-1, needs-2"},
},
expected: "Unable to evaluate `runs-on` of job blocked_job: job other_job is not in the `needs` list of job blocked_job (needs-1, needs-2).",
},
{
name: "ErrorCodeIncompleteRunsOnMissingMatrixDimension",
run: &ActionRun{
PreExecutionErrorCode: ErrorCodeIncompleteRunsOnMissingMatrixDimension,
PreExecutionErrorDetails: []any{"blocked_job", "platfurm"},
},
expected: "Unable to evaluate `runs-on` of job blocked_job: matrix dimension platfurm does not exist.",
},
{
name: "ErrorCodeIncompleteRunsOnUnknownCause",
run: &ActionRun{
PreExecutionErrorCode: ErrorCodeIncompleteRunsOnUnknownCause,
PreExecutionErrorDetails: []any{"blocked_job"},
},
expected: "Unable to evaluate `runs-on` of job blocked_job: unknown error.",
},
feat: support reusable workflow expansion when `with` or `strategy.matrix` contains ${{ needs... }} (#10647) This change allows the `with:` field of a reusable workflow to reference a previous job, such as `with: { some-input: "${{ needs.other-job.outputs.other-output }}" }`. `strategy.matrix` can also reference `${{ needs... }}`. When a job is parsed and encounters this situation, the outer job of the workflow is marked with a field `incomplete_with` (or `incomplete_matrix`), indicating to Forgejo that it can't be executed as-is and the other jobs in its `needs` list need to be completed first. And then in `job_emitter.go` when one job is completed, it checks if other jobs had a `needs` reference to it and unblocks those jobs -- but if they're marked with `incomplete_with` then they can be sent back through the job parser, with the now-available job outputs, to be expanded into the correct definition of the job. The core functionality for this already exists to allow `runs-on` and `strategy.matrix` to reference the outputs of other jobs, but it is expanded upon here to include `with` for reusable workflows. There is one known defect in this implementation, but it has a limited scope -- if this code path is used to expand a nested reusable workflow, then the `${{ input.... }}` context will be incorrect. This will require an update to the jobparser in runner version 12.4.0, and so it is out-of-scope of this PR. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). - **end-to-end test:** will require the noted "known defect" to be resolved, but tests are authored at https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/compare/main...mfenniak:expand-reusable-workflows-needs ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10647 Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
2025-12-31 19:04:35 +01:00
{
name: "ErrorCodeIncompleteWithMissingOutput",
run: &ActionRun{
PreExecutionErrorCode: ErrorCodeIncompleteWithMissingOutput,
PreExecutionErrorDetails: []any{"blocked_job", "other_job", "some_output"},
},
expected: "Unable to evaluate `with` of job blocked_job: job other_job is missing output some_output.",
},
{
name: "ErrorCodeIncompleteWithMissingJob",
run: &ActionRun{
PreExecutionErrorCode: ErrorCodeIncompleteWithMissingJob,
PreExecutionErrorDetails: []any{"blocked_job", "other_job", "needs-1, needs-2"},
},
expected: "Unable to evaluate `with` of job blocked_job: job other_job is not in the `needs` list of job blocked_job (needs-1, needs-2).",
},
{
name: "ErrorCodeIncompleteWithMissingMatrixDimension",
run: &ActionRun{
PreExecutionErrorCode: ErrorCodeIncompleteWithMissingMatrixDimension,
PreExecutionErrorDetails: []any{"blocked_job", "platfurm"},
},
expected: "Unable to evaluate `with` of job blocked_job: matrix dimension platfurm does not exist.",
},
{
name: "ErrorCodeIncompleteWithUnknownCause",
run: &ActionRun{
PreExecutionErrorCode: ErrorCodeIncompleteWithUnknownCause,
PreExecutionErrorDetails: []any{"blocked_job"},
},
expected: "Unable to evaluate `with` of job blocked_job: unknown error.",
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
err := TranslatePreExecutionError(lang, tt.run)
assert.Equal(t, tt.expected, err)
})
}
}