jojo/models/moderation/abuse_report_detailed.go

158 lines
5.5 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

feat: Admin interface for abuse reports (#7905) - Implementation of milestone 5. from **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting** (part of [amendment of the workplan](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/sustainability/src/branch/main/2022-12-01-nlnet/2025-02-07-extended-workplan.md#task-f-moderation-features-reporting) for NLnet 2022-12-035): `5. Forgejo admins can see a list of reports` There is a lot of room for improvements, but it was decided to start with a basic version so that feedback can be collected from real-life usages (based on which the UI might change a lot). - Also covers milestone 2. from same **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting**: `2. Reports from multiple users are combined in the database and don't create additional reports.` But instead of combining the reports when stored, they are grouped when retrieved (it was concluded _that it might be preferable to take care of the deduplication while implementing the admin interface_; see https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7939#issuecomment-4841754 for more details). --- Follow-up of !6977 ### See also: - forgejo/design#30 --- This adds a new _Moderation reports_ section (/admin/moderation/reports) within the _Site administration_ page, where administrators can see an overview with the submitted abuse reports that are still open (not yet handled in any way). When multiple reports exist for the same content (submitted by distinct users) only the first one will be shown in the list and a counter can be seen on the right side (indicating the number of open reports for the same content type and ID). Clicking on the counter or the icon from the right side will open the details page where a list with all the reports (when multiple) linked to the reported content is available, as well as any shadow copy saved for the current report(s). The new section is available only when moderation in enabled ([moderation] ENABLED config is set as true within app.ini). Discussions regarding the UI/UX started with https://codeberg.org/forgejo/design/issues/30#issuecomment-2908849 Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7905 Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: jerger <jerger@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org> Co-committed-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
2025-07-23 00:20:15 +02:00
// Copyright 2025 The Forgejo Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
package moderation
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"strings"
"forgejo.org/models/db"
"forgejo.org/modules/setting"
"forgejo.org/modules/timeutil"
"xorm.io/builder"
)
type AbuseReportDetailed struct {
AbuseReport `xorm:"extends"`
ReportedTimes int // only for overview
ReporterName string
ContentReference string
ShadowCopyDate timeutil.TimeStamp // only for details
ShadowCopyRawValue string // only for details
// In case the reported content was deleted before the report was handled, this flag can be set
// in order to try to determine the abuser/poster ID (and load their details) based on the fields
// that might have been saved within the shadow copy (for comments and issues/PRs).
ShouldGetAbuserFromShadowCopy bool `xorm:"-"`
feat: Admin interface for abuse reports (#7905) - Implementation of milestone 5. from **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting** (part of [amendment of the workplan](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/sustainability/src/branch/main/2022-12-01-nlnet/2025-02-07-extended-workplan.md#task-f-moderation-features-reporting) for NLnet 2022-12-035): `5. Forgejo admins can see a list of reports` There is a lot of room for improvements, but it was decided to start with a basic version so that feedback can be collected from real-life usages (based on which the UI might change a lot). - Also covers milestone 2. from same **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting**: `2. Reports from multiple users are combined in the database and don't create additional reports.` But instead of combining the reports when stored, they are grouped when retrieved (it was concluded _that it might be preferable to take care of the deduplication while implementing the admin interface_; see https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7939#issuecomment-4841754 for more details). --- Follow-up of !6977 ### See also: - forgejo/design#30 --- This adds a new _Moderation reports_ section (/admin/moderation/reports) within the _Site administration_ page, where administrators can see an overview with the submitted abuse reports that are still open (not yet handled in any way). When multiple reports exist for the same content (submitted by distinct users) only the first one will be shown in the list and a counter can be seen on the right side (indicating the number of open reports for the same content type and ID). Clicking on the counter or the icon from the right side will open the details page where a list with all the reports (when multiple) linked to the reported content is available, as well as any shadow copy saved for the current report(s). The new section is available only when moderation in enabled ([moderation] ENABLED config is set as true within app.ini). Discussions regarding the UI/UX started with https://codeberg.org/forgejo/design/issues/30#issuecomment-2908849 Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7905 Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: jerger <jerger@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org> Co-committed-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
2025-07-23 00:20:15 +02:00
}
func (ard AbuseReportDetailed) ContentTypeIconName() string {
switch ard.ContentType {
case ReportedContentTypeUser:
return "octicon-person"
case ReportedContentTypeRepository:
return "octicon-repo"
case ReportedContentTypeIssue:
return "octicon-issue-opened"
case ReportedContentTypeComment:
return "octicon-comment"
default:
return "octicon-question"
}
}
func (ard AbuseReportDetailed) ContentURL() string {
switch ard.ContentType {
case ReportedContentTypeUser:
return strings.TrimLeft(ard.ContentReference, "@")
case ReportedContentTypeIssue:
return strings.ReplaceAll(ard.ContentReference, "#", "/issues/")
default:
return ard.ContentReference
}
}
feat: add admin moderation actions for abuse reports and for reported abusive content (#8716) - Implementation of milestone 6. from **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting** (part of [amendment of the workplan](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/sustainability/src/branch/main/2022-12-01-nlnet/2025-02-07-extended-workplan.md#task-f-moderation-features-reporting) for NLnet 2022-12-035): `6. Forgejo admins can perform common actions on the listed reports (content deletion, locking of user account)` --- Follow-up of !7905 (and !6977) --- This adds some action buttons within the _Moderation reports_ section (/admin/moderation/reports) within the _Site administration_ page, so that administrators can: - mark a report as Handled or as Ignored (without performing any action on the reported content); - mark a user account as suspended (set `prohibit_login` = true); - delete (and purge) a user / organization and mark the linked reports as Handled; - delete a repository and mark the linked reports as Handled; - delete an issue / pull request and mark the linked reports as Handled; - delete a comment and mark the linked reports as Handled; The buttons were added on the sight side of each report from the overview, below the existing counter (that show how many times the content was reported and opens the details page). Only the buttons for updating the status of the report are directly visible - as `✓` and `✗` icons with some tooltips - while the content actions are hidden under a `⋯` dropdown. The implementation was done using HTMX so that the page is not refreshed after each action. Some discussions regarding the UI/UX started with https://codeberg.org/forgejo/design/issues/30#issuecomment-5958634 ### Manual testing - First make sure that moderation in enabled ([moderation] ENABLED config is set as true within app.ini). - Report multiple users, organizations, repositories, issues, pull requests and comments. - Go to _Moderation reports_ overview section section and make sure the buttons are visible; - The `✓` and `✗` should be available for each shown report; - The horizontal dropdown menu (`⋯`) should not be visible for reports linked to already deleted content. - The actions available within the dropdown menu should correspond to the reported content type (e.g. 'Suspend account' and 'Delete account' for users/organizations, 'Delete repository' for repositories, etc.). - When an action is successful a flash message should be displayed above the overview. - Warnings should be displayed (as flash messages) when trying to suspend or delete your account (in case someone reported you) or an organization. - An info (flash message) should be displayed when trying to suspend a user that is already suspended. - Mark a report as Handled / Ignored and observe that a success flash message confirms the action and the report is removed from the list without reloading the page; - Refresh the page to make sure the report will not be loaded again (also check in the DB that the status was updated and the resolved timestamp is correctly set). - Suspend a user account and make sure the report remains in the list (it is not resolved); - Make sure the above user gets the 'Suspended account' notice after login. - Delete a user account and observe that a success flash message confirms the action and the report is removed from the list without reloading the page; - Make sure that all owned organizations and repositories as well as all the issues, PRs and comments posted in other repositories were deleted; - Make sure the linked abuse reports are marked as Handled (and resolved timestamp is set). - Delete an organization and make sure that owned repositories were also deleted. - Similarly, delete a repository / issue / PR / comment and check that the contents are not available any more and the linked reports are resolved. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8716 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org> Co-committed-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
2025-12-03 20:07:32 +01:00
func (ard AbuseReportDetailed) ReportedContentIsUser() bool {
return ard.ContentType == ReportedContentTypeUser
}
func (ard AbuseReportDetailed) ReportedContentIsRepo() bool {
return ard.ContentType == ReportedContentTypeRepository
}
func (ard AbuseReportDetailed) ReportedContentIsIssue() bool {
return ard.ContentType == ReportedContentTypeIssue
}
func (ard AbuseReportDetailed) ReportedContentIsComment() bool {
return ard.ContentType == ReportedContentTypeComment
}
feat: Admin interface for abuse reports (#7905) - Implementation of milestone 5. from **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting** (part of [amendment of the workplan](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/sustainability/src/branch/main/2022-12-01-nlnet/2025-02-07-extended-workplan.md#task-f-moderation-features-reporting) for NLnet 2022-12-035): `5. Forgejo admins can see a list of reports` There is a lot of room for improvements, but it was decided to start with a basic version so that feedback can be collected from real-life usages (based on which the UI might change a lot). - Also covers milestone 2. from same **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting**: `2. Reports from multiple users are combined in the database and don't create additional reports.` But instead of combining the reports when stored, they are grouped when retrieved (it was concluded _that it might be preferable to take care of the deduplication while implementing the admin interface_; see https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7939#issuecomment-4841754 for more details). --- Follow-up of !6977 ### See also: - forgejo/design#30 --- This adds a new _Moderation reports_ section (/admin/moderation/reports) within the _Site administration_ page, where administrators can see an overview with the submitted abuse reports that are still open (not yet handled in any way). When multiple reports exist for the same content (submitted by distinct users) only the first one will be shown in the list and a counter can be seen on the right side (indicating the number of open reports for the same content type and ID). Clicking on the counter or the icon from the right side will open the details page where a list with all the reports (when multiple) linked to the reported content is available, as well as any shadow copy saved for the current report(s). The new section is available only when moderation in enabled ([moderation] ENABLED config is set as true within app.ini). Discussions regarding the UI/UX started with https://codeberg.org/forgejo/design/issues/30#issuecomment-2908849 Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7905 Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: jerger <jerger@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org> Co-committed-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
2025-07-23 00:20:15 +02:00
func GetOpenReports(ctx context.Context) ([]*AbuseReportDetailed, error) {
var reports []*AbuseReportDetailed
// - For PostgreSQL user table name should be escaped.
// - Escaping can be done with double quotes (") but this doesn't work for MariaDB.
// - For SQLite index column name should be escaped.
// - Escaping can be done with double quotes (") or backticks (`).
// - For MariaDB/MySQL there is no need to escape the above.
// - Therefore we will use double quotes (") but only for PostgreSQL and SQLite.
feat: add admin moderation actions for abuse reports and for reported abusive content (#8716) - Implementation of milestone 6. from **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting** (part of [amendment of the workplan](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/sustainability/src/branch/main/2022-12-01-nlnet/2025-02-07-extended-workplan.md#task-f-moderation-features-reporting) for NLnet 2022-12-035): `6. Forgejo admins can perform common actions on the listed reports (content deletion, locking of user account)` --- Follow-up of !7905 (and !6977) --- This adds some action buttons within the _Moderation reports_ section (/admin/moderation/reports) within the _Site administration_ page, so that administrators can: - mark a report as Handled or as Ignored (without performing any action on the reported content); - mark a user account as suspended (set `prohibit_login` = true); - delete (and purge) a user / organization and mark the linked reports as Handled; - delete a repository and mark the linked reports as Handled; - delete an issue / pull request and mark the linked reports as Handled; - delete a comment and mark the linked reports as Handled; The buttons were added on the sight side of each report from the overview, below the existing counter (that show how many times the content was reported and opens the details page). Only the buttons for updating the status of the report are directly visible - as `✓` and `✗` icons with some tooltips - while the content actions are hidden under a `⋯` dropdown. The implementation was done using HTMX so that the page is not refreshed after each action. Some discussions regarding the UI/UX started with https://codeberg.org/forgejo/design/issues/30#issuecomment-5958634 ### Manual testing - First make sure that moderation in enabled ([moderation] ENABLED config is set as true within app.ini). - Report multiple users, organizations, repositories, issues, pull requests and comments. - Go to _Moderation reports_ overview section section and make sure the buttons are visible; - The `✓` and `✗` should be available for each shown report; - The horizontal dropdown menu (`⋯`) should not be visible for reports linked to already deleted content. - The actions available within the dropdown menu should correspond to the reported content type (e.g. 'Suspend account' and 'Delete account' for users/organizations, 'Delete repository' for repositories, etc.). - When an action is successful a flash message should be displayed above the overview. - Warnings should be displayed (as flash messages) when trying to suspend or delete your account (in case someone reported you) or an organization. - An info (flash message) should be displayed when trying to suspend a user that is already suspended. - Mark a report as Handled / Ignored and observe that a success flash message confirms the action and the report is removed from the list without reloading the page; - Refresh the page to make sure the report will not be loaded again (also check in the DB that the status was updated and the resolved timestamp is correctly set). - Suspend a user account and make sure the report remains in the list (it is not resolved); - Make sure the above user gets the 'Suspended account' notice after login. - Delete a user account and observe that a success flash message confirms the action and the report is removed from the list without reloading the page; - Make sure that all owned organizations and repositories as well as all the issues, PRs and comments posted in other repositories were deleted; - Make sure the linked abuse reports are marked as Handled (and resolved timestamp is set). - Delete an organization and make sure that owned repositories were also deleted. - Similarly, delete a repository / issue / PR / comment and check that the contents are not available any more and the linked reports are resolved. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8716 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org> Co-committed-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
2025-12-03 20:07:32 +01:00
// - Also, note that builder.Union() is broken: gitea.com/xorm/builder/issues/71
feat: Admin interface for abuse reports (#7905) - Implementation of milestone 5. from **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting** (part of [amendment of the workplan](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/sustainability/src/branch/main/2022-12-01-nlnet/2025-02-07-extended-workplan.md#task-f-moderation-features-reporting) for NLnet 2022-12-035): `5. Forgejo admins can see a list of reports` There is a lot of room for improvements, but it was decided to start with a basic version so that feedback can be collected from real-life usages (based on which the UI might change a lot). - Also covers milestone 2. from same **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting**: `2. Reports from multiple users are combined in the database and don't create additional reports.` But instead of combining the reports when stored, they are grouped when retrieved (it was concluded _that it might be preferable to take care of the deduplication while implementing the admin interface_; see https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7939#issuecomment-4841754 for more details). --- Follow-up of !6977 ### See also: - forgejo/design#30 --- This adds a new _Moderation reports_ section (/admin/moderation/reports) within the _Site administration_ page, where administrators can see an overview with the submitted abuse reports that are still open (not yet handled in any way). When multiple reports exist for the same content (submitted by distinct users) only the first one will be shown in the list and a counter can be seen on the right side (indicating the number of open reports for the same content type and ID). Clicking on the counter or the icon from the right side will open the details page where a list with all the reports (when multiple) linked to the reported content is available, as well as any shadow copy saved for the current report(s). The new section is available only when moderation in enabled ([moderation] ENABLED config is set as true within app.ini). Discussions regarding the UI/UX started with https://codeberg.org/forgejo/design/issues/30#issuecomment-2908849 Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7905 Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: jerger <jerger@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org> Co-committed-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
2025-07-23 00:20:15 +02:00
identifierEscapeChar := ``
if setting.Database.Type.IsPostgreSQL() || setting.Database.Type.IsSQLite3() {
identifierEscapeChar = `"`
}
err := db.GetEngine(ctx).SQL(fmt.Sprintf(`SELECT AR.*, ARD.reported_times, U.name AS reporter_name, REFS.ref AS content_reference
FROM abuse_report AR
INNER JOIN (
SELECT min(id) AS id, count(id) AS reported_times
FROM abuse_report
WHERE status = %[2]d
GROUP BY content_type, content_id
) ARD ON ARD.id = AR.id
LEFT JOIN %[1]suser%[1]s U ON U.id = AR.reporter_id
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT %[3]d AS type, id, concat('@', name) AS "ref"
FROM %[1]suser%[1]s WHERE id IN (
SELECT content_id FROM abuse_report WHERE status = %[2]d AND content_type = %[3]d
)
UNION
SELECT %[4]d AS "type", id, concat(owner_name, '/', name) AS "ref"
FROM repository WHERE id IN (
SELECT content_id FROM abuse_report WHERE status = %[2]d AND content_type = %[4]d
)
UNION
SELECT %[5]d AS "type", I.id, concat(IR.owner_name, '/', IR.name, '#', I.%[1]sindex%[1]s) AS "ref"
FROM issue I
LEFT JOIN repository IR ON IR.id = I.repo_id
WHERE I.id IN (
SELECT content_id FROM abuse_report WHERE status = %[2]d AND content_type = %[5]d
)
UNION
SELECT %[6]d AS "type", C.id, concat(CIR.owner_name, '/', CIR.name, '/issues/', CI.%[1]sindex%[1]s, '#issuecomment-', C.id) AS "ref"
FROM comment C
LEFT JOIN issue CI ON CI.id = C.issue_id
LEFT JOIN repository CIR ON CIR.id = CI.repo_id
WHERE C.id IN (
SELECT content_id FROM abuse_report WHERE status = %[2]d AND content_type = %[6]d
)
) REFS ON REFS.type = AR.content_type AND REFS.id = AR.content_id
ORDER BY AR.created_unix ASC`, identifierEscapeChar, ReportStatusTypeOpen,
ReportedContentTypeUser, ReportedContentTypeRepository, ReportedContentTypeIssue, ReportedContentTypeComment)).
Find(&reports)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return reports, nil
}
func GetOpenReportsByTypeAndContentID(ctx context.Context, contentType ReportedContentType, contentID int64) ([]*AbuseReportDetailed, error) {
var reports []*AbuseReportDetailed
// Some remarks concerning PostgreSQL:
// - user table should be escaped (e.g. `user`);
feat: add admin moderation actions for abuse reports and for reported abusive content (#8716) - Implementation of milestone 6. from **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting** (part of [amendment of the workplan](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/sustainability/src/branch/main/2022-12-01-nlnet/2025-02-07-extended-workplan.md#task-f-moderation-features-reporting) for NLnet 2022-12-035): `6. Forgejo admins can perform common actions on the listed reports (content deletion, locking of user account)` --- Follow-up of !7905 (and !6977) --- This adds some action buttons within the _Moderation reports_ section (/admin/moderation/reports) within the _Site administration_ page, so that administrators can: - mark a report as Handled or as Ignored (without performing any action on the reported content); - mark a user account as suspended (set `prohibit_login` = true); - delete (and purge) a user / organization and mark the linked reports as Handled; - delete a repository and mark the linked reports as Handled; - delete an issue / pull request and mark the linked reports as Handled; - delete a comment and mark the linked reports as Handled; The buttons were added on the sight side of each report from the overview, below the existing counter (that show how many times the content was reported and opens the details page). Only the buttons for updating the status of the report are directly visible - as `✓` and `✗` icons with some tooltips - while the content actions are hidden under a `⋯` dropdown. The implementation was done using HTMX so that the page is not refreshed after each action. Some discussions regarding the UI/UX started with https://codeberg.org/forgejo/design/issues/30#issuecomment-5958634 ### Manual testing - First make sure that moderation in enabled ([moderation] ENABLED config is set as true within app.ini). - Report multiple users, organizations, repositories, issues, pull requests and comments. - Go to _Moderation reports_ overview section section and make sure the buttons are visible; - The `✓` and `✗` should be available for each shown report; - The horizontal dropdown menu (`⋯`) should not be visible for reports linked to already deleted content. - The actions available within the dropdown menu should correspond to the reported content type (e.g. 'Suspend account' and 'Delete account' for users/organizations, 'Delete repository' for repositories, etc.). - When an action is successful a flash message should be displayed above the overview. - Warnings should be displayed (as flash messages) when trying to suspend or delete your account (in case someone reported you) or an organization. - An info (flash message) should be displayed when trying to suspend a user that is already suspended. - Mark a report as Handled / Ignored and observe that a success flash message confirms the action and the report is removed from the list without reloading the page; - Refresh the page to make sure the report will not be loaded again (also check in the DB that the status was updated and the resolved timestamp is correctly set). - Suspend a user account and make sure the report remains in the list (it is not resolved); - Make sure the above user gets the 'Suspended account' notice after login. - Delete a user account and observe that a success flash message confirms the action and the report is removed from the list without reloading the page; - Make sure that all owned organizations and repositories as well as all the issues, PRs and comments posted in other repositories were deleted; - Make sure the linked abuse reports are marked as Handled (and resolved timestamp is set). - Delete an organization and make sure that owned repositories were also deleted. - Similarly, delete a repository / issue / PR / comment and check that the contents are not available any more and the linked reports are resolved. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8716 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org> Co-committed-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
2025-12-03 20:07:32 +01:00
// - tried to use aliases for table names but errors like 'pq: invalid reference to FROM-clause entry'
// or 'pq: missing FROM-clause entry' were returned;
feat: Admin interface for abuse reports (#7905) - Implementation of milestone 5. from **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting** (part of [amendment of the workplan](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/sustainability/src/branch/main/2022-12-01-nlnet/2025-02-07-extended-workplan.md#task-f-moderation-features-reporting) for NLnet 2022-12-035): `5. Forgejo admins can see a list of reports` There is a lot of room for improvements, but it was decided to start with a basic version so that feedback can be collected from real-life usages (based on which the UI might change a lot). - Also covers milestone 2. from same **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting**: `2. Reports from multiple users are combined in the database and don't create additional reports.` But instead of combining the reports when stored, they are grouped when retrieved (it was concluded _that it might be preferable to take care of the deduplication while implementing the admin interface_; see https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7939#issuecomment-4841754 for more details). --- Follow-up of !6977 ### See also: - forgejo/design#30 --- This adds a new _Moderation reports_ section (/admin/moderation/reports) within the _Site administration_ page, where administrators can see an overview with the submitted abuse reports that are still open (not yet handled in any way). When multiple reports exist for the same content (submitted by distinct users) only the first one will be shown in the list and a counter can be seen on the right side (indicating the number of open reports for the same content type and ID). Clicking on the counter or the icon from the right side will open the details page where a list with all the reports (when multiple) linked to the reported content is available, as well as any shadow copy saved for the current report(s). The new section is available only when moderation in enabled ([moderation] ENABLED config is set as true within app.ini). Discussions regarding the UI/UX started with https://codeberg.org/forgejo/design/issues/30#issuecomment-2908849 Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7905 Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: jerger <jerger@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org> Co-committed-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
2025-07-23 00:20:15 +02:00
err := db.GetEngine(ctx).
Select("abuse_report.*, `user`.name AS reporter_name, abuse_report_shadow_copy.created_unix AS shadow_copy_date, abuse_report_shadow_copy.raw_value AS shadow_copy_raw_value").
Table("abuse_report").
Join("LEFT", "user", "`user`.id = abuse_report.reporter_id").
Join("LEFT", "abuse_report_shadow_copy", "abuse_report_shadow_copy.id = abuse_report.shadow_copy_id").
Where(builder.Eq{
"content_type": contentType,
"content_id": contentID,
"status": ReportStatusTypeOpen,
}).
Asc("abuse_report.created_unix").
Find(&reports)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return reports, nil
}