[v15.0/forgejo] fix: in actions_service cancelJobsForRun is bugous use killRun instead (#12492)

The conflict resolution is explained in the "Conflict" section of the commit message. I used `cherry-pick -x`. Here is the conflict for information (simple one).

```diff
unmerged   services/actions/schedule_tasks.go
@@@ -22,8 -22,7 +22,12 @@@ import

  	"code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/v12/act/jobparser"
  	act_model "code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/v12/act/model"
++<<<<<<< HEAD
 +	"github.com/robfig/cron/v3"
 +	"xorm.io/builder"
++=======
+ 	"github.com/gdgvda/cron"
++>>>>>>> b6af380324 (fix: in actions_service cancelJobsForRun is bugous use killRun instead)
  )

  // StartScheduleTasks start the task
```

---

**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12366

The cancelJobsForRun function is redundant with the killRun function
and has bugs:

- It does not use a transaction and may fail in a non-recoverable way
- It does not update the commit status of the run
- It does not set NeedRemoval to false if needed

Remove the cancelJobsForRun function and use killRun instead (fixing
forgejo/forgejo#12386). Both calls are covered by existing tests:

- TestCancelPreviousJobs
- TestCancelPreviousWithConcurrencyGroup

A new integration test TestActionsPullRequestTrustPushCancel is added
to verify that the NeedApproval field is set to false whenever a run
is cancelled (fixing forgejo/forgejo#12350).

Closes forgejo/forgejo#12350
Closes forgejo/forgejo#12386

(cherry picked from commit b6af380324)

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12492
Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
This commit is contained in:
limiting-factor 2026-05-09 21:00:52 +02:00 committed by Mathieu Fenniak
parent ed2a3d8681
commit 51866ad6b8
4 changed files with 71 additions and 59 deletions

View file

@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ func UpdateRunApprovalByID(ctx context.Context, id int64, approval ApprovalType,
func GetRunsNotDoneByRepoIDAndPullRequestPosterID(ctx context.Context, repoID, pullRequestPosterID int64) ([]*ActionRun, error) {
var runs []*ActionRun
// performance relies on indexes on repo_id and status
if err := db.GetEngine(ctx).Where("repo_id=? AND pull_request_poster_id=?", repoID, pullRequestPosterID).And(builder.In("status", []Status{StatusUnknown, StatusWaiting, StatusRunning, StatusBlocked})).Find(&runs); err != nil {
if err := db.GetEngine(ctx).Where("repo_id=? AND pull_request_poster_id=?", repoID, pullRequestPosterID).And(builder.In("status", PendingStatuses())).Find(&runs); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return runs, nil
@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ func GetRunsNotDoneByRepoIDAndPullRequestPosterID(ctx context.Context, repoID, p
func GetRunsNotDoneByRepoIDAndPullRequestID(ctx context.Context, repoID, pullRequestID int64) ([]*ActionRun, error) {
var runs []*ActionRun
// performance relies on indexes on repo_id and status
if err := db.GetEngine(ctx).Where("repo_id=? AND pull_request_id=?", repoID, pullRequestID).And(builder.In("status", []Status{StatusUnknown, StatusWaiting, StatusRunning, StatusBlocked})).Find(&runs); err != nil {
if err := db.GetEngine(ctx).Where("repo_id=? AND pull_request_id=?", repoID, pullRequestID).And(builder.In("status", PendingStatuses())).Find(&runs); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return runs, nil