[CVSS 5.3 Medium](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- The `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` APIs allow a user to link an issue in one repository as "depending upon" an issue in another repository. Forgejo's implementation had an incorrect permission check which would verify only that the user had write permissions on the issue being modified, and not on the issue it was linking to. Due to the incorrect permission check, it was possible to view limited information (the existence of, and title of) an issue in a private repository that the user does not have access to view. The permission check has been corrected to take into account visibility of the remote repository.
[CVSS 5.3 Medium](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- Fetching information about a release via the `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/releases/tag/{tag}` API endpoint did not check whether the release was a draft, allowing accessing to information about a draft release to users who could predict an upcoming release tag but didn't have access to view it. The missing check has been added, returning a 404 response when the release is not published.
[CVSS 6.3 Medium](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- Forgejo's web interface allows deleting tags on a git repository through a form post. The endpoint for this form post had misconfigured middleware handlers which enforce security rights, allowing an anonymous user, or a logged-in user without the correct permissions, to delete tags on repositories that they did not own by injecting arbitrary internal tag identifiers into the form. The middleware handler configuration has been corrected.
[CVSS 2.1 Low](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- When the head branch of a pull request matches a branch protection rule, the head branch should be able to be merged or rebased only according to the "Push" rules defined in the protection rule. An implementation error checked those branch protection rules in the context of the base repository rather than the head repository, allowing users with write access to the base repository to be considered able to push to the branch, bypassing the "Enable push" option's expected security control.
[CVSS 2.1 Low](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- An issue owner can manipulate form inputs to delete the content history of comments they did not create, as long as those comments are on issues that they own. Although comment content is not affected, the history of edits on the comment can be trimmed. The validation in the form handler was corrected.
[CVSS 5.1 Medium](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- When a repository is configured with tag protection rules, it should not be possible for a user that is outside the whitelisted users or teams from modifying the protected tags. An incorrect parameter being passed to a security verification method allowed a user with write access to the repo to delete tags even if they were protected, as long as the tag was originally created by a user who is still authorized by the protection rules.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Security bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Zml4KGFwaSk6IGZpeCBkZXBlbmRlbmN5IHJlcG8gcGVybXMgaW4gQ3JlYXRlL1JlbW92ZUlzc3VlRGVwZW5kZW5jeQ==-->fix(api): fix dependency repo perms in Create/RemoveIssueDependency<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 1 --><!--description Zml4KGFwaSk6IGRyYWZ0IHJlbGVhc2VzIGNvdWxkIGJlIHJlYWQgYmVmb3JlIGJlaW5nIHB1Ymxpc2hlZA==-->fix(api): draft releases could be read before being published<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 2 --><!--description bWlzY29uZmlndXJlZCBzZWN1cml0eSBjaGVja3Mgb24gdGFnIGRlbGV0ZSB3ZWIgZm9ybQ==-->misconfigured security checks on tag delete web form<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 3 --><!--description aW5jb3JyZWN0IGxvZ2ljIGluICJVcGRhdGUgUFIiIGRpZCBub3QgZW5mb3JjZSBoZWFkIGJyYW5jaCBwcm90ZWN0aW9uIHJ1bGVzIGNvcnJlY3RseQ==-->incorrect logic in "Update PR" did not enforce head branch protection rules correctly<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 4 --><!--description aXNzdWUgb3duZXIgY2FuIGRlbGV0ZSBhbm90aGVyIHVzZXIncyBjb21tZW50J3MgZWRpdCBoaXN0b3J5IG9uIHNhbWUgaXNzdWU=-->issue owner can delete another user's comment's edit history on same issue<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 5 --><!--description dGFnIHByb3RlY3Rpb24gcnVsZXMgY2FuIGJlIGJ5cGFzc2VkIGR1cmluZyB0YWcgZGVsZXRlIG9wZXJhdGlvbg==-->tag protection rules can be bypassed during tag delete operation<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Joshua Rogers <MegaManSec@users.noreply.github.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9362
Do not display the title of unsubscribed issues or pull requests in the notification web page . The title of some random issues or pull requests from repositories were accidentally displayed in the notifications of a user. It was a rare occurrence, caused by an incorrect comparison of two unrelated unique identifiers that are unlikely to match (the id of the notification and the id of a repository). If the issue or the pull request belonged to a private repository to which the user had no read access, only the title was leaked. The user was denied permission to view the issue or the pull request when clicking on the link displayed in the notifications web page.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [x] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Security bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9362): <!--number 9362 --><!--line 0 --><!--description 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-->Do not display the title of unsubscribed issues or pull requests in the notification web page . The title of some random issues or pull requests from repositories were accidentally displayed in the notifications of a user. It was a rare occurrence, caused by an incorrect comparison of two unrelated unique identifiers that are unlikely to match (the id of the notification and the id of a repository). If the issue or the pull request belonged to a private repository to which the user had no read access, only the title was leaked. The user was denied permission to view the issue or the pull request when clicking on the link displayed in the notifications web page.<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9363
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Failing the migration when a corrupted record is found is problematic because there is no transaction and the database may need to be restored from a backup to attempt the migration again, after deleting the corrupted records.
Each documented case of failed migration was resolved by removing the corrupted records. There is no instance of a failed migration that was caused by non corrupted record.
In the unlikely event of a false negative where a two_factor record is discarded although it is in use, the only consequence is that the user will have to enroll again. Detailed logs are displayed so the Forgejo admin can file a bug report if that happens.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/6637
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7251): <!--number 7251 --><!--line 0 --><!--description V2hlbiBtaWdyYXRpbmcgdG8gRm9yZ2VqbyB2MTAsIHRoZSBUT1RQIHNlY3JldHMgZm91bmQgdG8gYmUgY29ycnVwdGVkIGFyZSBub3cgdHJhbnNwYXJlbnRseSByZW1vdmVkIGZyb20gdGhlIGRhdGFiYXNlIGluc3RlYWQgb2YgZmFpbGluZyB0aGUgbWlncmF0aW9uLiBUT1RQIGlzIG5vIGxvbmdlciByZXF1aXJlZCB0byBsb2dpbiB3aXRoIHRoZSBhc3NvY2lhdGVkIHVzZXJzLiBUaGV5IHNob3VsZCBiZSBpbmZvcm1lZCBiZWNhdXNlIHRoZXkgd2lsbCBuZWVkIHRvIHZpc2l0IHRoZWlyIHNlY3VyaXR5IHNldHRpbmdzIGFuZCBjb25maWd1cmUgVE9UUCBhZ2Fpbi4gTm8gb3RoZXIgYWN0aW9uIGlzIHJlcXVpcmVkLg==-->When migrating to Forgejo v10, the TOTP secrets found to be corrupted are now transparently removed from the database instead of failing the migration. TOTP is no longer required to login with the associated users. They should be informed because they will need to visit their security settings and configure TOTP again. No other action is required.<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7251
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Closes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/6042
Continuation of: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6284
Replaces: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6285
Context: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6284#issuecomment-2518599
Create a new type of comment: `CommentTypeAggregator`
Replaces the grouping of labels and review request in a single place: the comment aggregator
The whole list of comments is "scanned", if they can get aggregated (diff of time < 60secs, same poster, open / close issue, add / del labels, add /del review req), they are added to the aggregator.
Once needed, the list of all the aggregated comments are replaced with a single aggregated comment containing all the data required.
In templates, have a specific HTML rendering part for the comment aggregator, reuse the same rendering as with the other types of comments.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6523
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Litchi Pi <litchi.pi@proton.me>
Co-committed-by: Litchi Pi <litchi.pi@proton.me>
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6351#issuecomment-2585484 was fixed
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Other changes without a feature or bug label
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6656): <!--number 6656 --><!--line 0 --><!--description UmVsZWFzZS1ub3RlIGZvciBQUiAjNjM1MSB3YXMgYWRkZWQuIGh0dHBzOi8vY29kZWJlcmcub3JnL2Zvcmdlam8vZm9yZ2Vqby9wdWxscy82MzUxI2lzc3VlY29tbWVudC0yNTg1NDg0IHdhcyBmaXhlZA==-->Release-note for PR #6351 was added. https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6351#issuecomment-2585484 was fixed<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: gamzinav <gamzinav@basealt.ru>
Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Gamzin <gamzin@altlinux.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6656
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Alex619829 <alex619829@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Alex619829 <alex619829@noreply.codeberg.org>
If a row in the two_factor table references a non existent user, it may contain a secret that has an invalid format. Such an orphaned row is never used and should be removed.
Improve the error message to suggest using the doctor to remove it.
Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/6637
## Testing
- make TAGS='sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify' watch
- make TAGS='sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify' forgejo
- sqlite3 data/gitea.db 'INSERT INTO two_factor VALUES( 0, 500, "", "", "", "", 0, 0)'
- ./forgejo doctor check --run check-db-consistency
```
[1] Check consistency of database
- [W] Found 1 Orphaned TwoFactor without existing User
OK
All done (checks: 1).
```
- ./forgejo doctor check --run check-db-consistency --fix
```
[1] Check consistency of database
- [I] Deleted 1 Orphaned TwoFactor without existing User
OK
All done (checks: 1).
```
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6639): <!--number 6639 --><!--line 0 --><!--description VGVhY2ggdGhlIGRvY3RvciB0byByZW1vdmUgb3JwaGFuZWQgdHdvX2ZhY3RvciB3aXRoIGBmb3JnZWpvIGRvY3RvciBjaGVjayAtLXJ1biBjaGVjay1kYi1jb25zaXN0ZW5jeSAtLWZpeGAuIFN1Y2ggcm93cyBtYXkgY29udGFpbiBpbnZhbGlkIGRhdGEgYW5kIFtibG9jayB0aGUgbWlncmF0aW9uIHRvIHYxMF0oaHR0cHM6Ly9jb2RlYmVyZy5vcmcvZm9yZ2Vqby9mb3JnZWpvL2lzc3Vlcy82NjM3KSB3aXRoIGEgbWVzc2FnZSBzdWNoIGFzIGBmYWlsZWQ6IEFlc0RlY3J5cHQgaW52YWxpZCBkZWNyeXB0ZWQgYmFzZTY0IHN0cmluZzogaWxsZWdhbCBiYXNlNjQgZGF0YSBhdCBpbnB1dCBieXRlIDBgLg==-->Teach the doctor to remove orphaned two_factor with `forgejo doctor check --run check-db-consistency --fix`. Such rows may contain invalid data and [block the migration to v10](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/6637) with a message such as `failed: AesDecrypt invalid decrypted base64 string: illegal base64 data at input byte 0`.<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6639
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
- Add a permission check that the doer has write permissions to the head
repository if the the 'delete branch after merge' is enabled when
merging a pull request.
- Unify the checks in the web and API router to `DeleteBranchAfterMerge`.
- Added integration tests.
- If you select a portion of the comment, `Quote reply` will not only
quote that portion and not copy paste the whole text as it previously
did. This is achieved by using the `@github/quote-selection` package.
- There's preprocessing to ensure Forgejo-flavored markdown syntax is
preserved.
- e2e test added.
- Resolves#1342
The Issue and PullRequest list has 3 states:
- open: This lists all open Issues/PullRequests
- closed: This lists all closed Issues/PullRequests
- all: This lists all open and closed Issues/PullRequests
If you want to get to the all state, you need to click Open while in open state or Closed while in closed state, which is very unintuitive. This PR adss a third button to get to this state.
I'm not sure if the eye icon fits well, but I couldn't find a better one.
Tests will be added once #4124 is merged.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4125
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: JakobDev <jakobdev@gmx.de>
Co-committed-by: JakobDev <jakobdev@gmx.de>
- The Conan and Container packages use a different type of
authentication. It first authenticates via the regular way (api tokens
or user:password, handled via `auth.Basic`) and then generates a JWT
token that is used by the package software (such as Docker) to do the
action they wanted to do. This JWT token didn't properly propagate the
API scopes that the token was generated for, and thus could lead to a
'scope escalation' within the Conan and Container packages, read
access to write access.
- Store the API scope in the JWT token, so it can be propagated on
subsequent calls that uses that JWT token.
- Integration test added.
- Resolves#5128
