It was possible to hijack attachments during update and create functions
to another owner as permissions to check they weren't already attached
to another resource and wasn't checked if it belonged to the repository
that was being operated on.
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11282
It is unfortunately all mixed up, because refreshing the data, means breaking the tests. And changing the code means needing fresh data.
- tests: ignore some more headers and sort the rest when dumping http responses
- code: fixed#10234 by requesting the latest issues first.
- tests: created a new repo to replace the disappeared repo, needed for the skip-numbers test
- refreshed the testdata.
- follow-up fixes to get the tests green.
- including a cherry-pick of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/36295 and #11272
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11484
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** #11145
(cherry picked from commit 462ad7bb33)
On an open PR that is waiting for job approval, if jobs haven't been approved by the time the abandon timeout occurs they get marked as cancelled. This doesn't match the expectations of abandoned jobs in my opinion, which is that they were never able to be dispatched to a runner (no matching labels), but these jobs never got a chance. They should remain valid and blocked until approved.
Discovered while testing #11125, but unrelated to the behaviour fixed there.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11145
Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11148
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** #11063Fixes#11030.
When a `strategy.matrix` needs to be evaluated on the output of another job, it can become evaluated into an empty set of jobs. In this case, and assuming no other jobs in the run are active, the run should reach a settled state. The logic to check the other jobs in the run and determine if this state has been hit needs to be explicitly added to the job emitter.
To accomplish this change, this action run state logic was extracted out of `UpdateRunJobWithoutNotification` where it could be reused.
(cherry picked from commit c198082975)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11072
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Fixes#10881
Call the proper function for each repository the user watches, so adjusting the watch count can be done properly.
Co-authored-by: christopher-besch <mail@chris-besch.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11060
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Christopher Besch <mail@chris-besch.com>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11007
Found while working on https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10798#issuecomment-10083846: The symptom was that the go-github client never returned a `resp.After`, so I tracked down the root cause, which was that, with the mocked http server ...
Mocked headers never reached the calling client, because w.WriteHeader()
was called before the headers were set in the response.
Fix by moving w.WriteHeader() to the right place just before w.Write(),
which writes the body.
Test added which fails without the fix and succeeds with it.
Co-authored-by: Nils Goroll <nils.goroll@uplex.de>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11058
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10945#10893 introduced a retry loop to manage concurrent updates when updating the state of `action_run` in the function `UpdateRunJobWithoutNotification`. However, when `UpdateRunJobWithoutNotification` is called from within a transaction, the retry loop continues to read the same data from the DB (due to repeatable read isolation) and loops infinitely.
As #10893 was later identified to not be required to fix the target problem (https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/issues/1302), this PR reverts the change. The only retained change is that the error `ErrActionRunOutOfDate` is a constant rather than `errors.New("run has changed")`.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] Reverted the test added for 10893 after confirming that it is the cause of the problem.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change.
- [ ] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change.
*The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.*
The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10947
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10893
When concurrent updates occur to the `action_run` table, fetching a task via `FetchTask` can result in an error:
```
time="2026-01-16T16:02:30Z" level=error msg="failed to fetch task" error="internal: pick task: CreateTaskForRunner: update run 2358339: run has changed"
```
This is an error with no known harm. However, this error is correlated with the forgejo/forgejo repo encountering zombie tasks, where they appear as if they are recorded as dispatched to a runner but a runner doesn't pick them up. I think it would be worthwhile to prevent this error and see if it fixes the zombie tasks, or eliminate it as a potential cause.
See https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/issues/1302#issuecomment-73859 for a more detailed technical analysis.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change.
- [ ] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change.
*The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.*
The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10906
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10888
The existing implementation of `DropTableColumns()` came from before SQLite had the ability to `ALTER TABLE ... DROP COLUMN ...`. It works by parsing the table definition and rewriting it without the columns that are to be dropped, but it will fail to do this correctly if the table definition is not in the exact expected format. In #10887, a database that had probably come through some migration tool was not exactly formatted the way Forgejo expected, resulting in a migration failure.
This replaces `DropTableColumns()`'s hacky SQLite implementation with a more straightforward implementation. Affected indexes touching the target fields are dropped, then the field is dropped.
DROP COLUMN is supported on SQLite since [3.35.0, 2021-03-12](https://sqlite.org/releaselog/3_35_0.html).
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- Existing `test-sqlite-migration` coverage is relied upon for this change. During development it was proven to exercise the affected code -- in other words, multiple iterations of changes were required due to it failing as I worked on it.
- No coverage is added for "database with unexpected schema definition format" as the trigger issue for this change though, a point that can be raised if someone believes it is worthwhile.
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change.
- [ ] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change.
*The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.*
The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10903
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10863
When an action's job fails, it marks the entire run as failed. Concurrency group cancellation was only looking for runs that are in a pending state, and therefore after a single job failed in the run, none of the other jobs in the run could be cancelled by a matching cancel-in-progress job.
Raised in https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/2315.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10871
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10854
Discovered while trying to reproduce #10848 -- when using `forgejo doctor recreate-tables` against a PostgreSQL database with multiple Forgejo schemas in it, it fails. The reason is that when querying for index and sequence information, it begins to get information from the other schemas.
```
2026/01/15 15:19:15 ...3.6.1/command_run.go:288:run() [I] PING DATABASE postgresschema
2026/01/15 15:19:15 ...igrations/base/db.go:51:func2() [I] Creating temp table: tmp_recreate__external_login_user for Bean: ExternalLoginUser
2026/01/15 15:19:15 ...igrations/base/db.go:108:func2() [I] Copying table external_login_user to temp table tmp_recreate__external_login_user
2026/01/15 15:19:15 ...igrations/base/db.go:120:func2() [I] Dropping existing table external_login_user, and renaming temp table tmp_recreate__external_login_user in its place
2026/01/15 15:19:15 cmd/doctor.go:216:func1() [E] [Error SQL Query] ALTER INDEX "external_login_user_pkey" RENAME TO "external_login_user_pkey" [] - ERROR: relation "external_login_user_pkey" does not exist (SQLSTATE 42P01)
2026/01/15 15:19:15 ...igrations/base/db.go:404:renameTable() [E] Unable to rename external_login_user_pkey to external_login_user_pkey. Error: ERROR: relation "external_login_user_pkey" does not exist (SQLSTATE 42P01)
Command error: migrate: ERROR: relation "external_login_user_pkey" does not exist (SQLSTATE 42P01)
```
This is a very niche use-case that is likely to only affect a developer using PostgreSQL and popping back to older releases often enough to keep them around in different DB schemas. I don't think it's worth an automated test, which would require creating a secondary DB schema in a specific migration test. Manually tested on my dev environment.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10870
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10686
```
NAME:
forgejo doctor cleanup-commit-status - Cleanup extra records in commit_status table
USAGE:
forgejo doctor cleanup-commit-status
DESCRIPTION:
Forgejo suffered from a bug which caused the creation of more entries in the
"commit_status" table than necessary. This operation removes the redundant
data caused by the bug. Removing this data is almost always safe.
These reundant records can be accessed by users through the API, making it
possible, but unlikely, that removing it could have an impact to
integrating services (API: /repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits/{ref}/statuses).
It is safe to run while Forgejo is online.
On very large Forgejo instances, the performance of operation will improve
if the buffer-size option is used with large values. Approximately 130 MB of
memory is required for every 100,000 records in the buffer.
Bug reference: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/10671
OPTIONS:
--help, -h show help
--custom-path string, -C string Set custom path (defaults to '{WorkPath}/custom')
--config string, -c string Set custom config file (defaults to '{WorkPath}/custom/conf/app.ini')
--work-path string, -w string Set Forgejo's working path (defaults to the directory of the Forgejo binary)
--verbose, -V Show process details
--dry-run Report statistics from the operation but do not modify the database
--buffer-size int Record count per query while iterating records; larger values are typically faster but use more memory (default: 100000)
--delete-chunk-size int Number of records to delete per DELETE query (default: 1000)
```
The cleanup effectively performs `SELECT * FROM commit_status ORDER BY repo_id, sha, context, index, id`, and iterates through the records. Whenever `index, id` changes without the other fields changing, then it's a useless record that can be deleted. The major complication is doing that at scale without bringing the entire database table into memory, which is performed through a new iteration method `IterateByKeyset`.
Manually tested against a 455,303 record table in PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite, which was reduced to 10,781 records, dropping 97.5% of the records.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- Documentation should be via release notes and automatic CLI documentation updates.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10781
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
`GPGKeyToEntity` incorrectly assumed that within a keyring with multiple
keys that the first key is verified and should be exported. Look at all
keys and find the one that matches the verified key ID.
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10662
- create the modules/testimport/import.go to centralize blank import needed for tests (in order to run the init() function) to simplify maintenance
- remove the imports that are not needed
Co-authored-by: limiting-factor <limiting-factor@posteo.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10672
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10568
Changes foreign key database inconsistency handling so that inconsistent records are automatically deleted with an administrator warning during migration. As noted in discussion: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/discussions/issues/385#issuecomment-9175566
Because these migrations are now deleting data, rather than allowing the administrator to do it, all migrations have been covered with an integration test that verifies expected data is deleted. This is particularly interesting with nullable fields.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10621
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10588
API call `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/times` has no defined ordering implemented in it, causing PostgreSQL to have intermittent test failures on `TestAPIGetTrackedTimes` which expected records to be returned in ID order. ID order is reasonable enough, so this PR adds that ordering.
Fixes#10577.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10593
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10394
Previously searching for posters would use full name or username depending on the `[ui].DEFAULT_SHOW_FULL_NAME` setting, now it searches for both of them regardless of the setting.
This also a fixes a bug when `[ui].DEFAULT_SHOW_FULL_NAME=true` that users without a full name where not able to searched for.
Co-authored-by: BtbN <btbn@btbn.de>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10542
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9261
Change that the Cancel button is shown until all jobs are finished and do not hide it, when the first job failed.
Additionally the wrapping of the header was changed.
Fixes#8922
Co-authored-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10531
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Make the variable `GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF` available in Forgejo Action workflows. It is the ref path to the workflow and looks like `testowner/testrepo/.forgejo/workflows/test-workflow.yaml@refs/heads/main` ([GitHub documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflows-and-actions/variables)). GitHub Actions like [gh-action-pypi-publish](https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish) rely on its presence. See https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/forgejo-actions-feature-requests/issues/56 for additional details.
`GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF` cannot be generated easily during an action run. Either the path to workflow file has to be hardcoded or inferred by replicating the logic Forgejo uses to determine it. That is further complicated by the fact that Forgejo supports multiple search paths, namely `.forgejo/workflows`, `.gitea/workflows`, and `.github/workflows`. It is also the reason that the workflow directory is now stored in the database alongside the name of the workflow file.
Partial implementation is required in Forgejo Runner, see https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/1197.
Example workflow:
```yaml
on:
push:
workflow_dispatch:
schedule:
- cron: "* * * * *"
jobs:
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- run: |
echo "FORGEJO_WORKFLOW_REF=$FORGEJO_WORKFLOW_REF"
echo "GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF=$GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF"
echo "forgejo.workflow_ref=${{ forgejo.workflow_ref }}"
echo "github.workflow_ref=${{ github.workflow_ref }}"
```
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10276
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch>
Co-committed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch>
Fixes#10416
Followup to a hardcoded string in [gitea#17743](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/17743)
* instead of using a hardcoded namespace, use the configured application domain
* `ssh-keygen` refuses to work with empty namespace, but `Domain` falls back to `localhost`:
95dca7ff57/modules/setting/server.go (L192)
* since `VerifySSHKey` verifies the namespace, I think that using a mostly-unique string instead of a hardcoded one doesn't hurt. Here's what `man ssh-keygen` says on the topic:
> An additional signature namespace, used to prevent signature confusion across different domains of use (e.g. file signing vs email signing) must be provided via the -n flag. Namespaces are arbitrary strings, and may include: “file” for file signing, “email” for email signing. For custom uses, it is recommended to use
names following a NAMESPACE@YOUR.DOMAIN pattern to generate unambiguous namespaces.
## Testing
There's a test `TestFromOpenSSH` but it uses a hardcoded default namespace `file`:
95dca7ff57/models/asymkey/ssh_key_test.go (L334)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10429
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
* sets all cached ActivityPub users to ProhibitLogin
* creates a new UserType to uniquely identify users from ActivityPub
This has the side effect that ActivityPub users will no longer be listed in the admin view.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10434
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: famfo <famfo@famfo.xyz>
Co-committed-by: famfo <famfo@famfo.xyz>
Closes#9129. I decided to try myself in contributing to Forgejo after having found this bug mentioned on Fedi.
I have also added a basic test for this behaviour, but this means that this PR adds a SHA-256 repo to the fixture set, so it can be reused in other tests.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10309
Reviewed-by: Lucas <sclu1034@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Nikita Karamov <me@kytta.dev>
Co-committed-by: Nikita Karamov <me@kytta.dev>
This PR is part of #4767.
It contains
* add log to federation services
* separat test package for test (fix dependency cycles)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10371
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Michael Jerger <michael.jerger@meissa-gmbh.de>
Co-committed-by: Michael Jerger <michael.jerger@meissa-gmbh.de>
Closes#10078 and includes another small improvement (for comments and issues/PRs the title from report/s details page already included the poster name; now it will clickable, opening the poster profile page).
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10194
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
Co-committed-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
Thanks a lot to @floss4good who pointed this out in the comments of
#10253!
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10275
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: floss4good <floss4good@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: nachtjasmin <nachtjasmin@posteo.de>
Co-committed-by: nachtjasmin <nachtjasmin@posteo.de>
On the page displaying the logs of an action run attempt, the header directly above the logs always showed the status of the job. That resulted in the wrong status being displayed for previous run attempts.
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/10236.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [x] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10321): <!--number 10321 --><!--line 0 --><!--description ZGlzcGxheSBhY3Rpb24gcnVuIGF0dGVtcHQgc3RhdHVzIGluc3RlYWQgb2Ygam9iIHN0YXR1cw==-->display action run attempt status instead of job status<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10321
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch>
Co-committed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch>
Allows referencing the outputs of previously executed jobs in the `runs-on` field directly by a `${{ needs.some-job.outputs.some-output }}`, and also *indirectly* through the job's `strategy.matrix`. At its most complicated, supports a workflow with dynamic matrices like this:
```yaml
jobs:
define-matrix:
runs-on: docker
outputs:
array-value: ${{ steps.define.outputs.array }}
steps:
- id: define
run: |
echo 'array=["debian-bookworm", "debian-trixie"]' >> "$FORGEJO_OUTPUT"
runs-on-dynamic-matrix:
needs: define-matrix
strategy:
matrix:
my-runners: ${{ fromJSON(needs.define-matrix.outputs.array-value) }}
runs-on: ${{ matrix.my-runners }}
steps:
- run: uname -a
```
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
- Documentation already (incorrectly) states that `jobs.<job-id>.runs-on` can access the `needs` context. 😛https://forgejo.org/docs/latest/user/actions/reference/#availability
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Features
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10308): <!--number 10308 --><!--line 0 --><!--description ZmVhdChhY3Rpb25zKTogc3VwcG9ydCByZWZlcmVuY2luZyBgJHt7IG5lZWRzLi4uIH19YCB2YXJpYWJsZXMgaW4gYHJ1bnMtb25g-->feat(actions): support referencing `${{ needs... }}` variables in `runs-on`<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10308
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Three fixes are presented together in this PR:
- When a `strategy.matrix` entry in an Action job contains `${{ needs.some-job.outputs.some-output }}`, if that output *never* becomes available, different error messages will be presented if `some-job` isn't found or if `some-output` isn't found. This clarifies an error message that was previously "it could be this, or it could be this".
- In the error case described in the previous point, other jobs in the workflow could continue running or could be left "blocked" forever. A centralized `FailRunPreExecutionError` function ensures that all incomplete jobs in the run are failed in this case.
- In a rare error case when a job referenced another job in `strategy.matrix` but no other jobs were defined in the workflow, the job would be marked as blocked forever because the `job_emitter` code would never be invoked to detect this case. A new `consistencyCheckRun` function for a newly created `ActionRun` adds a location to perform a pre-execution check for this case so that the run can be failed.
These fixes are all interconnected around the refactor for the `FailRunPreExecutionError`, causing them to be bundled rather than individual PRs.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- These are fixes to an unreleased feature and don't require release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10298
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
- Implementation of milestone 6. from **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting** (part of [amendment of the workplan](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/sustainability/src/branch/main/2022-12-01-nlnet/2025-02-07-extended-workplan.md#task-f-moderation-features-reporting) for NLnet 2022-12-035):
`6. Forgejo admins can perform common actions on the listed reports (content deletion, locking of user account)`
---
Follow-up of !7905 (and !6977)
---
This adds some action buttons within the _Moderation reports_ section (/admin/moderation/reports) within the _Site administration_ page, so that administrators can:
- mark a report as Handled or as Ignored (without performing any action on the reported content);
- mark a user account as suspended (set `prohibit_login` = true);
- delete (and purge) a user / organization and mark the linked reports as Handled;
- delete a repository and mark the linked reports as Handled;
- delete an issue / pull request and mark the linked reports as Handled;
- delete a comment and mark the linked reports as Handled;
The buttons were added on the sight side of each report from the overview, below the existing counter (that show how many times the content was reported and opens the details page). Only the buttons for updating the status of the report are directly visible - as `✓` and `✗` icons with some tooltips - while the content actions are hidden under a `⋯` dropdown.
The implementation was done using HTMX so that the page is not refreshed after each action.
Some discussions regarding the UI/UX started with https://codeberg.org/forgejo/design/issues/30#issuecomment-5958634
### Manual testing
- First make sure that moderation in enabled ([moderation] ENABLED config is set as true within app.ini).
- Report multiple users, organizations, repositories, issues, pull requests and comments.
- Go to _Moderation reports_ overview section section and make sure the buttons are visible;
- The `✓` and `✗` should be available for each shown report;
- The horizontal dropdown menu (`⋯`) should not be visible for reports linked to already deleted content.
- The actions available within the dropdown menu should correspond to the reported content type (e.g. 'Suspend account' and 'Delete account' for users/organizations, 'Delete repository' for repositories, etc.).
- When an action is successful a flash message should be displayed above the overview.
- Warnings should be displayed (as flash messages) when trying to suspend or delete your account (in case someone reported you) or an organization.
- An info (flash message) should be displayed when trying to suspend a user that is already suspended.
- Mark a report as Handled / Ignored and observe that a success flash message confirms the action and the report is removed from the list without reloading the page;
- Refresh the page to make sure the report will not be loaded again (also check in the DB that the status was updated and the resolved timestamp is correctly set).
- Suspend a user account and make sure the report remains in the list (it is not resolved);
- Make sure the above user gets the 'Suspended account' notice after login.
- Delete a user account and observe that a success flash message confirms the action and the report is removed from the list without reloading the page;
- Make sure that all owned organizations and repositories as well as all the issues, PRs and comments posted in other repositories were deleted;
- Make sure the linked abuse reports are marked as Handled (and resolved timestamp is set).
- Delete an organization and make sure that owned repositories were also deleted.
- Similarly, delete a repository / issue / PR / comment and check that the contents are not available any more and the linked reports are resolved.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8716
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
Co-committed-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
Implements synchronizing an external user's quota group with provided OAuth2 claim.
This functionality will allow system administrators to manage user's quota groups automatically.
Documentation is at forgejo/docs#1337
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8554
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: thezzisu <thezzisu@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: thezzisu <thezzisu@gmail.com>
This PR migrates the unmaintaiend `lib/pq` library to `jackc/pgx`, which is the de-facto standard lib in go for postgres connections these days.
Some implementation notes:
We register both `pgx` and `postgresschema` driver names (for backward comp). We can't register `postgres` as this one is still used by `lib/pq` imported by `go-chi/session`, which is in use when users go for the "postgres" session type in the "Session config.
It is questionable if anyone is really using the "postgres" driver option in the session config - but for consistency, it would be good to also migrate to `pgx` there, especially as the code lives within Forgejo under [go-chi/session](https://code.forgejo.org/go-chi/session).
`pgx` supports multi-host notation in the connection string. New tests have been added therefore.
`pgx` also allows for connection string parameters such as `?default_query_exec_mode=simple_protocol`. This should possibly allow running with `pgbouncer` "transaction" mode instead of "session", which could substantially enhance Postgres query handling.
## Checklist
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10219
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: pat-s <patrick.schratz@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: pat-s <patrick.schratz@gmail.com>
To make sure that the code stays maintainable, I added the `importas` linter to ensure that the imports for models and services stay consistent.
I realised that this might be needed after finding some discrepancies between singular/plural naming, and, especially in the case of the `forgejo.org/services/context` package, multiple different aliases like `gitea_ctx`, `app_context` and `forgejo_context`. I decided for `app_context`, as that seems to be the most commonly used naming.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10253
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: nachtjasmin <nachtjasmin@posteo.de>
Co-committed-by: nachtjasmin <nachtjasmin@posteo.de>
Identified in code review https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10244#issuecomment-8576643, the `PreExecutionError` field in `ActionRun` isn't well implemented as it translates the error at action runtime rather than later when the action is viewed in the UI. This PR adds an error code and error details column that can be more correctly translated.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10267
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
This change is motivated by 5e300a2a87
- Drop the `updated_by` and `commit_id` column, they are unused and have a index for no reason.
- Drop the index on `status` and `created_unix` and make a index on `(user_id, status)`.
## Test
1. Run migration.
2. Confirm the migration succeeds.
3. Check that `notification` table has the correct indexes.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9926
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/forgejo-actions-feature-requests/issues/71 requires partial implementation in runner, and partial in Forgejo; this is the Forgejo implementation.
Allows for the definition of dynamic job matrixes in Forgejo Actions, where an earlier job provides and output that is used in `strategy.matrix` for a later job that requires it. For example, adapted from the GitHub Actions example for this feature:
```yaml
name: shared matrix
on:
push:
workflow_dispatch:
jobs:
define-matrix:
runs-on: docker
outputs:
colors: ${{ steps.colors.outputs.colors }}
steps:
- name: Define Colors
id: colors
run: |
echo 'colors=["red", "green", "blue"]' >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
produce-artifacts:
runs-on: docker
needs: define-matrix
strategy:
matrix:
color: ${{ fromJSON(needs.define-matrix.outputs.colors) }}
steps:
- name: Define Color
env:
color: ${{ matrix.color }}
run: |
echo "$color" > color
- name: Produce Artifact
uses: https://data.forgejo.org/forgejo/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: ${{ matrix.color }}
path: color
consume-artifacts:
runs-on: docker
needs:
- define-matrix
- produce-artifacts
strategy:
matrix:
color: ${{ fromJSON(needs.define-matrix.outputs.colors) }}
steps:
- name: Retrieve Artifact
uses: https://data.forgejo.org/forgejo/download-artifact@v4
with:
name: ${{ matrix.color }}
- name: Report Color
run: |
cat color
```
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [x] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/1607
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Features
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10244): <!--number 10244 --><!--line 0 --><!--description ZmVhdChhY3Rpb25zKTogc3VwcG9ydCByZWZlcmVuY2luZyAke3sgbmVlZHMuLi4gfX0gdmFyaWFibGVzIGluIGBzdHJhdGVneS5tYXRyaXhg-->feat(actions): support referencing ${{ needs... }} variables in `strategy.matrix`<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10244
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
This resolves#10057 by showing a list of links to pull requests with the head branch being the one just pushed.
Since there may be multiple pull requests with different base branches, we find all of them and print them.
Here is a comparison table for pushing to the `feature` branch when having 2 pull requests: `feature -> dev`, and `feature -> prod`. `main` being the default branch.
## Before
remote:
remote: Create a new pull request for 'feature':
remote: http://localhost:3000/user1/repo1/compare/main...feature
remote:
## After
remote:
remote: Create a new pull request for 'feature':
remote: http://localhost:3000/user1/repo1/compare/main...feature
remote: Visit the existing pull requests:
remote: http://localhost:3000/user1/repo1/pulls/1 merges into dev
remote: http://localhost:3000/user1/repo1/pulls/3 merges into prod
remote:
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10079
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Calixte Pernot <cpernot@praksys.net>
Co-committed-by: Calixte Pernot <cpernot@praksys.net>
If, for any reason (e.g. server crash), a task is recorded as done in the database but the logs are still in the database instead of being in storage, they need to be collected.
The log_in_storage field is only set to true after the logs have been transfered to storage and can be relied upon to reflect which tasks have lingering logs.
A cron job collects lingering logs every day, 3000 at a time, sleeping one second between them. In normal circumstances there will be only a few of them, even on a large instance, and there is no need to collect them as quickly as possible.
When there are a lot of them for some reason, garbage collection must happen at a rate that is not too hard on storage I/O.
Refs https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/9999
---
Note on backports: the v11 backport is done manually because of minor conflicts. https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10024
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10009): <!--number 10009 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Z2FyYmFnZSBjb2xsZWN0IGxpbmdlcmluZyBhY3Rpb25zIGxvZ3M=-->garbage collect lingering actions logs<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10009
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Fixes#9963. This realigns all the indexes on the `action` table to best match their intended usages.
New:
- `IDX_action_created_unix (created_unix)`
- Intended for usage in `DeleteOldActions`.
- `IDX_action_repo_id_created_unix (repo_id, created_unix)`
- Intended for usage when fetching action feeds for a repo and a team, with the same logic as that described below in `IDX_action_user_id_created_unix`.
- `IDX_action_repo_id_op_type (repo_id, op_type)`
- Intended for `DeleteIssueActions` when it searches for CreateIssue & CreatePullRequest actions for cleanup. Could be optimized further with a denormalization of the issue identifier into a field, but there's no current evidence that this is required.
Replaced:
- `IDX_action_c_u (created_unix, user_id)`
- Replaced with `IDX_action_user_id_created_unix (user_id, created_unix)`. When action feeds are created w/ `ORDER BY created_unix DESC LIMIT 20`, an index beginning with `created_unix` will have to index scan until it can satisfy 20 records; the `user_id` portion of the index is effectively useless until two records appear at the same time. By inverting the order, the database will be able to identify the records created by a user and then pop the most recent 20 from the index order.
- At the scale of database I have access to, the performance difference is unmeasurable. This change is supported by theoretical grounds and the findings of #9963, but no experimental evidence.
Removed:
- `IDX_action_user_id (user_id)`
- Redundant with the new `IDX_action_user_id_created_unix`.
- `IDX_action_r_u (repo_id, user_id)`
- No clear consumer for this index.
Retained with no modification:
- `IDX_action_comment_id (comment_id)`
- Used in `DeleteIssueActions`.
- `IDX_action_au_r_c_u (act_user_id, repo_id, created_unix, user_id)`
- Heat map generation.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10040
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Within Codeberg we are looking into distributing the database queries, we tried forgejo/forgejo!7212 on several occasions but never got it to work.
After a long debugging session in a staging environment I was able to find two bugs that made it impossible for this feature to work: forgejo/docs!1587 which resulted in replica engines never being configured and used if you followed the documentation. The other bug is what this patch intends to fix. In order to do some database operation, you need the database engine - it will first look if one is set for the context (only useful for transactions) and otherwise create a new session of the engine from the master engine `x`. The problem is that `x` is explicitly set to be the master engine and not the engine group (that includes the replica engines) - Unless the code uses `DefaultContext`, which is almost nowhere used after some great refactoring in Gitea to use the passed context, it did not use the replica engines.
Get engine from the `DefaultContext` (which is set to the enginegroup) and create a new session from that.
20f8572b92/models/db/engine.go (L220-L231)
And `SetDefaultEngine` is called from 20f8572b92/models/db/engine.go (L212)
Where `eng` is the engine group.
## Test
1. Configure database replicas.
2. Start Forgejo.
3. Verify Forgejo loads.
4. Stop the database replicas.
5. Verify Forgejo shows 500 errors.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10140
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Although #9922 was deployed to Codeberg, it was reported on Matrix that a user observed a `-1` pull request count.
@Gusted checked and verified that the stats stored in redis appeared incorrect, and that no errors occurred on Codeberg that included the repo ID (eg. deadlocks, SQL queries).
```
127.0.0.1:6379> GET Repo:CountPulls:924266
"1"
127.0.0.1:6379> GET Repo:CountPullsClosed:924266
"2"
```
One possible cause is that when `UpdateRepoIssueNumbers` is invoked and invalidates the cache key for the repository, it is currently in a transaction; the next request for that cached count could be computed before the transaction is committed and the update is visible. It's been verified that `UpdateRepoIssueNumbers` is called within a transaction in most interactions (I put a panic in it if `db.InTransaction(ctx)`, and most related tests failed).
This PR fixes that hole by performing the cache invalidation in an `AfterTx()` hook which is invoked after the transaction is committed to the database.
(Another possible cause is documented in #10127)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10130
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Currently `DeriveKey` is called every time that a secret must be encoded/decoded. Since this function is deterministic, its result can be cached to allow a 250x speedup (the original took less than half a microsecond, so this more of a micro-optimization...).
```
go test -bench=.
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: forgejo.org/modules/keying
cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 5 125H
BenchmarkExpandPRK-18 2071627 564.2 ns/op
BenchmarkExpandPRKOnce-18 541438192 2.206 ns/op
PASS
ok forgejo.org/modules/keying 2.369s
```
## Other changes
- Since the keys can be constructed once, it simplifies a bit the callsites (`keying.TOTP.Encrypt(...)` instead of `keying.DeriveKey(keying.ContextTOTP).Encrypt(...)`)
- All `Encrypt`/`Decrypt` calls will panic forever if called before `Init` has been called (current it panics as long as `Init` has not been called)
- Calling `Init` twice with different keys will trigger a panic (currently racy)
- Calling `Decrypt` with a short ciphertext does not panic anymore (like when calling with long-enough garbage)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10114
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
- Similair spirit of forgejo/forgejo!7453.
- Refactor the code in such a way that it always succeeds.
- To avoid doing mathematics if you use this function, define three security level (64, 128 and 256 bits) that correspond to a specific length which has that a security guarantee. I picked them as they fit the need for the existing usages of the code.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10110
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Lucas <sclu1034@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Forgejo Actions allows variables in `jobs.<job_id>.runs-on`. However, the action list [skips checking whether a suitable runner](c3412d0579/routers/web/repo/actions/actions.go (L114-L148)) is available if an expression contains variables. That hampers a user's ability to figure out whether an expression was evaluated correctly and why a job might not be picked up by an available runner.
This PR adds the ability to surface more complex and additional diagnostic information on the action view screen. Previously, only a job's status (waiting, running, ...) was displayed. Now, extended messages like "Waiting for a runner with the following labels: docker, trixie" are displayed with the possibility to show multiple messages simultaneously.
How it looked before:
How it looks after updating Forgejo without reloading the window:
How it looks afterwards with a single label:
How it looks afterwards with multiple labels:
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [x] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Features
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9966): <!--number 9966 --><!--line 0 --><!--description ZGlzcGxheSBkZXRhaWxlZCBhY3Rpb24gcnVuIGRpYWdub3N0aWNz-->display detailed action run diagnostics<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9966
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch>
Co-committed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch>
Previously, the variable value was empty when asking for a list of all repository variables.
I have extended the test coverage of all related endpoints and made the existing tests independent of each other.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Other changes without a feature or bug label
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10036): <!--number 10036 --><!--line 0 --><!--description aW5jbHVkZSB2YXJpYWJsZSB2YWx1ZXMgaW4gL3JlcG9zLy4uLi9hY3Rpb25zL3ZhcmlhYmxlcyBBUEkgcmVzcG9uc2U=-->include variable values in /repos/.../actions/variables API response<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10036
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch>
Co-committed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch>
