Fixesforgejo/forgejo#9980
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10002): <!--number 10002 --><!--line 0 --><!--description ZW5kbGVzcyByZWRpcmVjdGlvbiBsb29wIGJldHdlZW4gL3VzZXIvc2V0dGluZ3MvY2hhbmdlX3Bhc3N3b3JkIGFuZCAvdXNlci9zZXR0aW5ncy9zZWN1cml0eQ==-->endless redirection loop between /user/settings/change_password and /user/settings/security<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10002
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: zokki <zokki.softwareschmiede@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: zokki <zokki.softwareschmiede@gmail.com>
Fixes#9911
The endpoint was documented as taking `page` and `limit` parameters but did not actually use then and just returned the full list. Now it does use them!
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9915
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Cyborus <cyborus@cyborus.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Cyborus <cyborus@cyborus.xyz>
This PR is a follow-up to https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/1117. That PR has to be merged before this one can proceed.
The objective is to allow referencing the `inputs` context in `jobs.<job_id>.runs-on`. That enables users to enter a label in the Forgejo UI during `workflow_dispatch`.
Example:
```yaml
name: test
on:
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:
image:
required: true
type: string
jobs:
test:
runs-on: ${{ inputs.image }}
steps:
- run: echo "Running on ${{ inputs.image }}"
```
Using `inputs` with reusable workflows does not work. I haven't changed `schedule_tasks.go` because the `schedule` trigger does not support `inputs`.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Features
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9950): <!--number 9950 --><!--line 0 --><!--description QWxsb3cgcmVmZXJlbmNpbmcgaW5wdXRzIGluIGpvYnMuPGpvYl9pZD4ucnVucy1vbg==-->Allow referencing inputs in jobs.<job_id>.runs-on<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9950
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch>
Co-committed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch>
Fixes#9978.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9983
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
fix: #9782
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9897
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Cyborus <cyborus@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: fnoopv <fnoopv@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: fnoopv <fnoopv@noreply.codeberg.org>
instead of code.gitea.io/actions-proto-go
It is a hard fork of code.gitea.io/actions-proto-go which has been used by the runner in the past few months.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9981
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
When `concurrency.cancel-in-progress: false` is set on a Forgejo Action run, the run will be queued behind other runs of the same concurrency group. This requires a complex query to identify when a run can be dispatched to a runner. During a refactoring of this code in #9927, @earl-warren noted that the query was using a `status NOT IN (...)` clause, which we had discussed in another issue as a possible performance concern -- an index on `status` cannot be used to fulfill that query clause. This PR inverts the clause allowing an index to be used.
Covered by existing automated tests in `tests/integration/actions_concurrency_group_queue_test.go` -- a minor commented-out section was removed in these tests while reviewing for this change.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- Minor implementation change for a feature that is new in the v14 release; not relevant for the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9943
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Fixes#9846. The number of open action runs on a repo is not precomputed and stored on the repo, but is computed as needed and cached. The computation is faster than the update because it only calculates the smaller set of which action runs are not completed (as opposed to counting all of them).
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9927
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Followup to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6351
Previously, ALT RPM repository did not match packages with dots in their
names, causing 404 errors. Updated the regexp to correctly parse these paths.
Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Gamzin <gamzin@altlinux.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9763
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Alex619829 <alex619829@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Alex619829 <alex619829@noreply.codeberg.org>
Follow-up to #9868, #9916, #9922, adding an automated test that verifies no deadlocks occur when concurrently merging PRs in the same repo, with the same labels, and same milestone. Different base and head branches are used to ensure there are no git conflicts.
Resolves#9785.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9925
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
The `repository` table has quite a few "count of related objects" fields on it, including the number of issues, closed issues, pull requests, and closed pull requests. These fields specifically will cause deadlocks during concurrent PR merges as documented in #9785.
These fields are not used in database queries. In order to eliminate the deadlock possibility on them, I've moved them to be calculated on-demand with caching, with the cache being invalidated in the same places that the recalc used to be triggered.
I've supplemented the already in-place automated testing with manual testing performing simple close & reopen of issues & PRs, and the counts which are used in the tabs at the top of the repo page are updated correctly as expected.
Near future work:
- Similar change can probably be performed to fix#9846
- Last known deadlock identified from #9785; I'm hoping to incorporate the synthetic deadlock test in a near future PR to prevent regressions
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- Tests were already in-place covering these fields; they've been adjusted from using the fields to the new accessor methods.
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9922): <!--number 9922 --><!--line 0 --><!--description cmVkdWNlIGRlYWRsb2NrcyBtZXJnaW5nIFBScyBieSB1c2luZyBjYWNoaW5nIGZvciByZXBvIGlzc3VlIGNvdW50IHN0YXRz-->reduce deadlocks merging PRs by using caching for repo issue count stats<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9922
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
## Checklist
This PR contains both #9889 and #9912, since it depends on the one, and the other provides a test for it.
The exact reasoning behind its logic is described here: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/9473#issuecomment-7976186
This PR should return the behaviour back to how it was before a PR to Gitea changed it.
Only the resulting Database-Entry will reference the line blamed commit, now also with the correct adjusted line.
While the context diff view is pulled from the commit the commenter actually commented on.
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9914
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: BtbN <btbn@btbn.de>
Co-committed-by: BtbN <btbn@btbn.de>
Continuing the pattern from #9868, fixes another deadlock discovered in synthetic testing of #9785. This modifies the `milestone` table to have the `num_issues`, `num_closed_issues`, and `completeness` statistics be calculated asynchronously.
An optional `updateTimestamp` field was added to the stats queue to support the conditional updating of the milestone's modification date, retaining existing functionality.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9916
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
The intent of this change is to reduce the scope of deadlock issues identified in #9785. I've identified other deadlock issues from synthetic testing, so this is not a complete fix, but it's a partial fix. This design was discussed in #9785 and this is the most basic implementation, with a very small scope of work converted to use it.
Introduces a new `forgejo.org/services/stats` module which allows for the queuing and routing of recalc requests for object stats; in this case, the "number of issues" that are assigned to a label, and the number of closed issues that are assigned to a label.
The reasons that these calculations are performed asynchronously through a queue are:
- User operations that are common and performance-sensitive don't have to wait for recalculations that don't need to be exactly up-to-date at all times. For example, merging a pull request will be a faster operation; as it closes an issue, it needs to recalculate `label.num_closed_issues` for every label attached to the PR.
- Database deadlocks that can occur between concurrent operations -- for example, if you were holding a lock on an issue while recalculating a label's count of open issues -- can be broken by making the recalculation occur outside of the transaction.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
- Internal developer documentation is present.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [x] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9868
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Followup to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8859, https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9636.
Convert the create branch and rename branch modals in the branch list to native dialogs and convert the create branch and create tag in the commit view to native dialogs.
The dialogs in the commit view have been simplified and no longer uses javascript to construct the data in the dialog (thus would be eligible for nojs modals).
The dialogs have footer styled actions.
The rename branch modal now has a 'branch name' label to indicate the field is required.
E2E testing is added.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9760
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
The Gitea API responds with the full number of issue comments, when the `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/comments` endpoint is hit. Originally the number of comments is expected to paginated, so in the end it should always be lower than `MAX_RESPONSE_ITEMS` when the last page is hit.
However, due to the bug, this can never happen and so there will be an infinite loop.
This problem was inherited also into the Forgejo codebase. That means the same problem can occur when migrating from Forgejo to Forgejo.
Some fixes for the Forgejo API have been proposed for the Forgejo codebase see https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/5177 and https://codeberg.org/codeberg/community/issues/1542
An integration test was written which reproduces the exact behaviour. A more future proof solution was created that checks the relevant cases and decides whether the bug is still there or not.
It might be necessary to further distinguish between Gitea downloader and Forgejo downloader if we decide to update the Forgejo API. So we'll probably have to implement functionality and tests directly for the Forgejo downloader instead of just inheriting all the methods.
Co-authored-by: Michael Jerger <michael.jerger@meissa-gmbh.de>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9274
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: erik <erik_se@posteo.de>
Co-committed-by: erik <erik_se@posteo.de>
Replace the anti-CSRF token with a [cross origin protection by Go](https://go.dev/doc/go1.25#nethttppkgnethttp) that uses a stateless way of verifying if a request was cross origin or not. This allows is to remove al lot of code and replace it with a few lines of code and we no longer have to hand roll this protection. The new protection uses indicators by the browser itself that indicate if the request is cross-origin, thus we no longer have to take care of ensuring the generated CSRF token is passed back to the server any request by the the browser will have send this indicator.
Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#3538
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9830
Reviewed-by: oliverpool <oliverpool@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- When a issue sees a modification regarding to which project they are assigned, then a timeline event is created for this. The link to the project that is constructed for this timeline event incorrectly assumes the project is a repository project.
- Use the `Link` function to construct the link to the project, this will correctly take into account if the project is a org, user or repo project.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#9817
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9872
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- The E2E code did not actually assert that the functionality worked (`expect` was missing).
- Regression of forgejo/forgejo!9636
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#9893
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9899
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
**AI Disclosure:** This work was produced with the assistance of an artificial intelligence tool
## feat: Add admin endpoints for individual user email management
Add GET and DELETE endpoints at `/admin/users/{username}/emails` to allow
administrators to list and delete individual email addresses for users.
These API endpoints provide programmatic access to functionality that is
currently only available through the web UI:
- http://forgejo.example/admin/emails (delete individual email addresses)
- http://forgejo.example/admin/users/1 (view individual user's emails)
The new endpoints follow existing admin API naming patterns such as
`/admin/users/{username}/keys`, `/admin/users/{username}/orgs`, and
`/admin/users/{username}/quota`, providing consistent resource management
under the `/admin/users/{username}` namespace.
This complements the existing `/admin/emails` endpoint which lists all emails
across all users, providing administrators with granular control over
individual user email management.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9594
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Lerch <rlerch@redhat.com>
Co-committed-by: Ryan Lerch <rlerch@redhat.com>
The API endpoints to query pending jobs require the presence of the query parameter `labels`, for example, `http://localhost:3000/api/v1/user/actions/runners/jobs?labels=ubuntu`. If the query parameter is absent, no jobs are returned. This PR lifts that requirement and makes the respective API endpoints return all pending jobs if the `labels` parameter is absent. If the parameter `labels` is empty, it only returns jobs without any labels.
This change simplifies writing programs that ask Forgejo for the presence of pending jobs without having to know all labels. It helps with #9670, too.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9839
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch>
Co-committed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch>
- Migrate add/remove org repositories for teams to a native dialog.
- Is potential to be fully no-js, as javascript no longer constructs the modal.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#9801
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9877
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
While implementing #8222, a couple of typos slept through. This fixes them.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9880
Reviewed-by: Lucas <sclu1034@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
* Make danger buttons brighter - followup https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9652#issuecomment-7803875
The new lightness 0.26 is same as lightness of --color-box-body instead of being darker than it, so the form controls aren't darker than the background they're on which might look bad. Looks pretty good, the calculated contrast is fine.
* Apply new buttons to avatar upload/removal forms
* Better responds to overflowing
* Consistently apply medium font-weight to all buttons - followup https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9652#issuecomment-7783718
* This improves readability a lot. The previous normal weight was only chosen because some of the buttons had it, which wasn't a good excuse. We also have buttons with medium, and they are easier to read.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9863
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
- When clicking on the content history menu "edited" item, show a spinner animation as before the dropdown is show can take a measurable amount of time.
- We cannot rely on fomantic adding the loading indicator (although it does have this capability), it only adds this indicator when waiting for the network request. For a fast Forgejo instance waiting for the network response is faster than what fomantic is doing to prepare the dropdown.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#9841
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9874
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
`GetPullRequestFiles` is the API route handler to get the files that are changed in a pull request, it has to know the start commit and end commit to diff for (so it can gather the changed file and other information). The end commit is clear, the pr ref (`ref/pull/xxx/head`). However the start commit has to be computed, it is the merge base commit between the base branch and pr ref. However if the pr was merged, then we should use the `pr.MergeBase` as it's possible the `pr.BaseBranch` no longer exists.
Instead of doing this computation via `GetCompareInfo` that also does some other computations, compute the merge base directly ourselves in this function, if no merge base exists then fallback to the base reference (this is the same behavior as in `GetCompareInfo`). The only difference is that in the case of the fallback we don't convert the base ref to a commit ID, this is not necessary as the call to `git-diff` will accept any valid reference. So technically we could drop the call to `baseGitRepo.GetRefCommitID()` as well, but that's left for another time to keep the change minimal.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9740
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
This will be computed by [`NewPullrequest` via `testPatch`](3f1731a765/services/pull/pull.go (L40-L46)) before the pull request is inserted into the database: 4adec07103/services/pull/patch.go (L169-L177)
The AGit codepath already didn't set the mergebase.
Tests are added to confirm that merge-base is still indeed set upon pull request creation via the web route and API route.
There's no immediate benefit, this is in preparation of trying to do less `git` commands on certain web/API routes. The enhancement thus here being `compareInfo` is not used from `parseCompareInfo` and could potentially in the future no longer have to be computed or could be skipped to compute for this API route, similar for removing a dependency on `ci.CompareInfo`. The `compareInfo` is relatively _heavy_ to compute and is not used in all codepaths.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9734
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Noted in #9557 -- as more foreign keys are added, a couple test locations (`reverseproxy_test.go` and `cmd_admin_test.go`) that truncate fixture data have a growing list of impacted tables. This PR introduces a new `TruncateBeansCascade` which can be used for tests, as well as enhancing some helper functions that I expect will be used later to support automatic operation ordering.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. (**Implicitly tested** by virtue of usage in a test.)
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9684
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Had another random failure in `webauthn.test.e2e.ts`:
```
Retry #1 ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
TimeoutError: locator.click: Timeout 3000ms exceeded.
Call log:
- waiting for getByText('Sign out')
- waiting for" http://localhost:3003/user/settings/security" navigation to finish...
- navigated to "http://localhost:3003/user/settings/security"
- locator resolved to <a href="" tabindex="-1" role="menuitem" id="_aria_auto_id_10" data-url="/user/logout" class="item link-action">…</a>
- attempting click action
2 × waiting for element to be visible, enabled and stable
- element is not visible
- retrying click action
- waiting 20ms
2 × waiting for element to be visible, enabled and stable
- element is not visible
- retrying click action
- waiting 100ms
6 × waiting for element to be visible, enabled and stable
- element is not visible
- retrying click action
- waiting 500ms
41 | // Logout.
42 | await page.locator('div[aria-label="Profile and settings…"]').click();
> 43 | await page.getByText('Sign out').click();
| ^
44 | await expect(async () => {
45 | await page.waitForURL(`${workerInfo.project.use.baseURL}/`);
46 | }).toPass();
at /workspace/forgejo/forgejo/tests/e2e/webauthn.test.e2e.ts:43:36
```
While attempting to click `Sign out`, playwright waited for page navigation to `http://localhost:3003/user/settings/security` to complete, and then the `Sign out` button never became visible. This suggests to me that the test:
- Clicked `Add security key`
- There was a race between the browser, which began reloading `/user/settings/security`...
- And the test clicked on `Profile and settings…` immediately *before* the new page loaded, since that was visible and available on the old page
- Therefore `Sign out` never appeared on the new page to be clicked
This PR addresses the race by ensuring that after the security key is added, the page with the security key added is visible (specifically the Remove button). This should prevent the click on "Profile and settings" and "Sign out" from potentially occurring on different pages (as would happen if the reload occurred between the two clicks).
I have not been able to reproduce this exact failure locally, but I have tricked my e2e testing situation into reproducing other errors in this test by introducing a synthetic 100ms wait on every web request in the gitea server. After adding this fix, the test does not fail in that scenario. (🤷 Probably good, but no guarantee that we're not going to see another issue.)
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [x] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9688
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
feat: Add support for administrators to set email visibility on user accounts
This feature allows administrators to control user email privacy settings
through both the API and web interface.
**note: This was originally part of #9594 but is now split out into it's own PR**
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Features
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9668): <!--number 9668 --><!--line 0 --><!--description QWRkIHN1cHBvcnQgZm9yIGFkbWluaXN0cmF0b3JzIHRvIHNldCBlbWFpbCB2aXNpYmlsaXR5IG9uIHVzZXIgYWNjb3VudHM=-->Add support for administrators to set email visibility on user accounts<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9668
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Lerch <rlerch@redhat.com>
Co-committed-by: Ryan Lerch <rlerch@redhat.com>
Adds two foreign keys:
- `access.user_id` -> `user`
- `access.repo_id` -> `repository`
Testing:
- Existing automated test suite
- Minor adjustments required to `reverseproxy_test.go`
- Test failures caused a reorganization of delete operations in `DeleteRepositoryDirectly`
- Manually tested
- On "user" and "repo" Collaborator page, added, removed, and changed the access-level of collaborators
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Features
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9557): <!--number 9557 --><!--line 0 --><!--description YWRkIGZvcmVpZ24ga2V5cyB0byB0aGUgYGFjY2Vzc2AgdGFibGU=-->add foreign keys to the `access` table<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9557
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
When making a `POST` to start a workflow dispatch, and not specifying the option `"return_run_info": true`, the API handler attempts to render a `nil` as a JSON body to a `204 No Content` response. This results in an error being logged to the console, as this status code does not permit a body.
```
Render JSON failed: http: request method or response status code does not allow body
```
There is no functional impact except for a false error log, as `ctx.JSON` just logs a `Render JSON failed` error if it fails.
I could not find any existing code which allows integration tests to intercept or inspect log output, which would be required for an automated test verifying this is fixed. If anyone could advise an existing test that performs log interception, or any hints on how such a mechanism would be created, I don't mind adding it... but it may not be warranted for such a tiny bug either.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9675
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Follow up of forgejo/forgejo#8859
Move the following modals to native dialogs:
- Admin notice.
- Edit label.
- New label.
- Update email in admin's email list.
Each has a E2E test to screenshot the modal and test functionality.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9636
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
When you edit a comment and the comment already has a markdown editor,
then the code will click on the 'Write' tab, in case you canceled
editting the comment when you were at the 'Preview' tab. In
forgejo/forgejo#2681 I added `href="#"` to the tab items, this causes
that when the 'Write' tab is being clicked by the code the page is
jumped the beginning of the page.
Instead of being clever and trying to make this item interactive via
another way or via javascript avoid this jumping, we do better and make
this element a button. This item is not a link, it's a button that will
perform a action. This entirely avoids the issue of jumping and it's
still interactive.
Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#9542
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9645
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Flaky e2e test failure:
```
1) [Mobile Chrome] › tests/e2e/issue-comment-dropzone.test.e2e.ts:74:1 › Re-add images to dropzone on edit
Error: expect(locator).toHaveCount(expected) failed
Locator: locator('.dropzone').locator('.dz-preview')
Expected: 1
Received: 0
Timeout: 3000ms
Call log:
- Expect "toHaveCount" with timeout 3000ms
- waiting for locator('.dropzone').locator('.dz-preview')
7 × locator resolved to 0 elements
- unexpected value "0"
87 | await expect(dropzone.locator('.files').first()).toHaveCount(1);
88 | const preview = dropzone.locator('.dz-preview');
> 89 | await expect(preview).toHaveCount(1);
| ^
90 | await expect(preview.locator('.dz-filename')).toHaveText('foo.png');
91 | await expect(preview.locator('.octicon-copy')).toBeVisible();
92 | await assertCopy(page, workerInfo, ';
at /workspace/forgejo/forgejo/tests/e2e/issue-comment-dropzone.test.e2e.ts:89:25
```
Observed on chromium and Mobile Chrome.
I haven't been able to reproduce this test failure in local testing, but in examining the playwright test artifacts I noted that the browser is getting a `404 Not Found` error attempting to load a URL `(test server url)/uploading...` (where `...` is literally present in the URL). My theory is that the test is firing the paste event in `pasteImage` and not waiting for the XMLHttpRequest to complete the upload, and then saving the issue comment with the placeholder URL `uploading...` in the Markdown, causing a later failure. This patch adds two `waitForResponse` calls -- one when pasting the image to wait for the upload to complete, and one which is probably redundant which waits for the `/attachments` GET while editing the comment.
If this test continues to be flaky, it may at least have a different error revealing more about its cause.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9660
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Test failure:
```
1) [chromium] › tests/e2e/webauthn.test.e2e.ts:14:1 › WebAuthn register & login flow ─────────────
Error: page.goto: Navigation to "http://localhost:3003/user/login" is interrupted by another navigation to "http://localhost:3003/"
Call log:
- navigating to "http://localhost:3003/user/login", waiting until "load"
46 |
47 | // Login.
> 48 | response = await page.goto('/user/login');
| ^
49 | expect(response?.status()).toBe(200);
50 |
51 | await page.getByLabel('Username or email address').fill(username);
at /workspace/forgejo/forgejo/tests/e2e/webauthn.test.e2e.ts:48:25
```
I have not been able to reproduce this locally.
What seems to be happening is that the current code is clicking the "Sign out" menu option, and then while the browser is busy (navigating to `/logout`, redirecting to `/`), the test attempts to navigate directly to `/user/login`. The two navigations are racey, depending on how fast they work they may result in this error. The proposed fix is to wait for the sign-out operation to complete by waiting for the URL to land on `/`, before then proceeding with the rest of the test with the second login.
Normally this would be *just* a `waitForURL` call. But because of the redirect on logout, I've encountered the below error if the code is just invoking `waitForURL`. So I put the `waitForURL` invocation into an `expect(...).toPass()`. This isn't technically the correct usage of `toPass` which is intended for *assertions* which will eventually become successful, whereas this is attempting to retry a wait... but... a wait shouldn't need a retry. (I'd argue this is a Playwright bug.)
```
Error: page.waitForURL: net::ERR_ABORTED; maybe frame was detached?
```
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9662
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
