- fix: prevent git write to wiki repo from unauthorized user via git HTTP
- fix: prevent LFS authorization token from being used for read/write access after user's access is restricted from Forgejo
- fix: prevent scoped API access (OAuth tokens, Access tokens) from accessing resources beyond their permitted scope via non-API endpoints (e.g. /user/repo/raw/...)
- fix: implementing missing OAuth validation checks, improve protections against race conditions
- fix: prevent OAuth redirect URI spoofing via non-ascii case collision
- fix: strengthen Actions Artifact V4 signature algorithm against spoofing attacks
- fix: update Go toolchain to 1.25.10
Co-authored-by: Derzsi Dániel <daniel@tohka.us>
Co-authored-by: jvoisin <julien.voisin@dustri.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12495
Backport: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12292
When a pull request is opened, the author is able to mark that pull request to "Allow edits from maintainers", which grants the maintainers of the pull request's repo access to edit the pull request branch contents. It is possible to create a pull request where the pull request author does not have the ability to edit the pull request branch. Due to a missing security check for this case, maintainers of the pull request repo would be granted the ability to edit the pull request branch, even if the author of the pull request did not have that ability. By exploiting this missing security check, a user can edit any branch in a repository if they're able to fork that repository. The issue is being fixed by restricting the scope of "Allow edits from maintainers" to only grant that access if the pull request author also had access to edit the branch.
Thanks to Arvin Shivram of Brutecat Security for discovering and responsibly disclosing the vulnerability.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12295
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12144
API calls to `.../api/v1/repos/search?uid=-2&archived=false` currently do not apply the filter `uid` because of the negative value. This can occur when APIs are interacting with `${{ forgejo.token }}` and believe they're operating as the Forgejo Actions user, which has UID -2.
In combination with the security checks that occur in the `/repos/search` API to validate that repositories accessed are visible to the user, this can result in 500 error responses when a more correct expectation would be to receive no repositories:
da8898822c/routers/api/v1/repo/repo.go (L237-L242)
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. All work and communication must conform to Forgejo's [AI Agreement](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/AIAgreement.md). There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests for Go changes
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I ran...
- [x] `make pr-go` before pushing
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change.
- [ ] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12148
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** #11801
(cherry picked from commit 5365720abc)
Forgejo CI is currently failing due to changes in debian testing packaging that are not compatible with installing `git` from testing onto a bookworm system (https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/actions/runs/147815/jobs/2/attempt/1#jobstep-3-144).
Where `git` was being installed from testing it is replaced with just using trixie's `git 2.47.3`. Where `git-lfs` was being installed, it's been inlined with a simple `update` and `install`.
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change.
- [x] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11801
Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11803
Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport of forgejo/forgejo#11642**
- Deleting attachments are also seen as updating attachments due to the frontend always sending a field to edit the name even if the name didn't change. This was not reflected in the unit tests.
- Refactor the updating attachment logic to be more flexible if a attachment does not exist, because it was just deleted or because someone is being malicious.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#11636
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11642
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
(cherry picked from commit 8572835160)
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11679): <!--number 11679 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Zml4OiBkb24ndCB0cmlwIGRlbGV0aW5nIGF0dGFjaG1lbnQgd2l0aCBtaXNzaW5nIHBlcm1pc3Npb24gZXJyb3I=-->fix: don't trip deleting attachment with missing permission error<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11679
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Remove recipients that are not active (e.g. done by moderation or
organizational reasons) and those that have the permi ssion to read
releases on that repository.
It was sufficiently checked for the repostiory case, but for user/org
project it was not checked and you could change the state of any
project by there mere knowledge of a ID.
Required for backport of v15 security fixes w/ test automation, this is
a partial cherry-pick of 5589182c54.
Signed-off-by: Nils Philippsen <nils@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9906
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Co-authored-by: Nils Philippsen <nilsph@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Nils Philippsen <nilsph@noreply.codeberg.org>
The API already checked the permission sufficiently if auto merge could
be cancelled by the doer. The web route did not. Consolidate this check
in the function that lives in the services directory.
It was possible to hijack attachments during update and create functions
to another owner as permissions to check they weren't already attached
to another resource and wasn't checked if it belonged to the repository
that was being operated on.
There are two ways to use a OAuth2 token:
Via the Authorization header as a Bearer token.
Via the Authorization header as a Basic login.
For the former the scope was correctly passed through, for the latter it
was not and would mean no scope was checked if you used the token via
this way.
We do not know for sure, but it is quite likely someone assumed implicit
fallthrough. This meant that if someone used S256 for PKCE, it simply
did not verify the code challenge and always accepted it.
PKCE only started working recently as it was broken for a long time
already, forgejo/forgejo!8678
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10883
- tie go cache to go version, so it will cleanup from time to time [see](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/discussions/issues/436)
- Add `Makefile` to cache key hash, because it also has go deps
Co-authored-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10885
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [go](https://go.dev/) ([source](https://github.com/golang/go)) | toolchain | patch | `1.25.5` -> `1.25.6` |
---
> ⚠️ **Warning**
>
> Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
---
This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0Mi43OC4yIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiNDIuNzguMiIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6InYxMS4wL2Zvcmdlam8iLCJsYWJlbHMiOlsiZGVwZW5kZW5jeS11cGdyYWRlIiwidGVzdC9ub3QtbmVlZGVkIl19-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10852
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10780
Fixes a typo that prevents the forgejo docs builds from being updated.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change.
- [x] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change.
*The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.*
The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10839
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** #10686
(cherry picked from commit 270317a3ad)
```
NAME:
forgejo doctor cleanup-commit-status - Cleanup extra records in commit_status table
USAGE:
forgejo doctor cleanup-commit-status
DESCRIPTION:
Forgejo suffered from a bug which caused the creation of more entries in the
"commit_status" table than necessary. This operation removes the redundant
data caused by the bug. Removing this data is almost always safe.
These reundant records can be accessed by users through the API, making it
possible, but unlikely, that removing it could have an impact to
integrating services (API: /repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits/{ref}/statuses).
It is safe to run while Forgejo is online.
On very large Forgejo instances, the performance of operation will improve
if the buffer-size option is used with large values. Approximately 130 MB of
memory is required for every 100,000 records in the buffer.
Bug reference: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/10671
OPTIONS:
--help, -h show help
--custom-path string, -C string Set custom path (defaults to '{WorkPath}/custom')
--config string, -c string Set custom config file (defaults to '{WorkPath}/custom/conf/app.ini')
--work-path string, -w string Set Forgejo's working path (defaults to the directory of the Forgejo binary)
--verbose, -V Show process details
--dry-run Report statistics from the operation but do not modify the database
--buffer-size int Record count per query while iterating records; larger values are typically faster but use more memory (default: 100000)
--delete-chunk-size int Number of records to delete per DELETE query (default: 1000)
```
The cleanup effectively performs `SELECT * FROM commit_status ORDER BY repo_id, sha, context, index, id`, and iterates through the records. Whenever `index, id` changes without the other fields changing, then it's a useless record that can be deleted. The major complication is doing that at scale without bringing the entire database table into memory, which is performed through a new iteration method `IterateByKeyset`.
Manually tested against a 455,303 record table in PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite, which was reduced to 10,781 records, dropping 97.5% of the records.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10783
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10747
We need to take all matching required status into account to get the desired status because there can be some pending.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10787): <!--number 10787 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Zml4OiBjb3JyZWN0bHkgY29tcHV0ZSByZXF1aXJlZCBjb21taXQgc3RhdHVz-->fix: correctly compute required commit status<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10787
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
This was implicitly loaded during the mail notifications notifier. If
you disable mail notifications on Forgejo then this will result in the
reviewer not being loaded and NPE.
`GPGKeyToEntity` incorrectly assumed that within a keyring with multiple
keys that the first key is verified and should be exported. Look at all
keys and find the one that matches the verified key ID.
**Backport:** #10678
(cherry picked from commit 8f63ee9a94)
Fixes#10671.
Cleanup for the inflated number of records in this table will come in a near future change.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10681
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10632
`build-release.yml` attempts to run an end-to-end check with a cascading PR, but it doesn't target the currently building branch. When two releases build simultaneously (eg. `forgejo/v14.0` and `forgejo`), whichever one starts the end-to-end test first is then "cancelled" by the second one as it pushes an update to the same branch.
This will be a bit of an experimental change due to the difficulty in setting up a test environment. After merge, I intend to watch a v14 and forgejo build and verify that they are independent, and, that both are actually tested with the correct target build.
This introduces a need to backport any changes to `.forgejo/cascading-release-end-to-end` in the future to maintain cascading functionality in all active releases.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10634
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [go](https://go.dev/) ([source](https://github.com/golang/go)) | toolchain | patch | `1.25.3` -> `1.25.5` |
---
> ⚠️ **Warning**
>
> Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
---
This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0Mi4yNy41IiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiNDIuMjcuNSIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6InYxMS4wL2Zvcmdlam8iLCJsYWJlbHMiOlsiZGVwZW5kZW5jeS11cGdyYWRlIiwidGVzdC9ub3QtbmVlZGVkIl19-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10304
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
[CVSS 5.3 Medium](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- The `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` APIs allow a user to link an issue in one repository as "depending upon" an issue in another repository. Forgejo's implementation had an incorrect permission check which would verify only that the user had write permissions on the issue being modified, and not on the issue it was linking to. Due to the incorrect permission check, it was possible to view limited information (the existence of, and title of) an issue in a private repository that the user does not have access to view. The permission check has been corrected to take into account visibility of the remote repository.
[CVSS 5.3 Medium](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- Fetching information about a release via the `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/releases/tag/{tag}` API endpoint did not check whether the release was a draft, allowing accessing to information about a draft release to users who could predict an upcoming release tag but didn't have access to view it. The missing check has been added, returning a 404 response when the release is not published.
[CVSS 6.3 Medium](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- Forgejo's web interface allows deleting tags on a git repository through a form post. The endpoint for this form post had misconfigured middleware handlers which enforce security rights, allowing an anonymous user, or a logged-in user without the correct permissions, to delete tags on repositories that they did not own by injecting arbitrary internal tag identifiers into the form. The middleware handler configuration has been corrected.
[CVSS 2.1 Low](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- When the head branch of a pull request matches a branch protection rule, the head branch should be able to be merged or rebased only according to the "Push" rules defined in the protection rule. An implementation error checked those branch protection rules in the context of the base repository rather than the head repository, allowing users with write access to the base repository to be considered able to push to the branch, bypassing the "Enable push" option's expected security control.
[CVSS 2.1 Low](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- An issue owner can manipulate form inputs to delete the content history of comments they did not create, as long as those comments are on issues that they own. Although comment content is not affected, the history of edits on the comment can be trimmed. The validation in the form handler was corrected.
[CVSS 5.1 Medium](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- When a repository is configured with tag protection rules, it should not be possible for a user that is outside the whitelisted users or teams from modifying the protected tags. An incorrect parameter being passed to a security verification method allowed a user with write access to the repo to delete tags even if they were protected, as long as the tag was originally created by a user who is still authorized by the protection rules.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Security bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Zml4KGFwaSk6IGZpeCBkZXBlbmRlbmN5IHJlcG8gcGVybXMgaW4gQ3JlYXRlL1JlbW92ZUlzc3VlRGVwZW5kZW5jeQ==-->fix(api): fix dependency repo perms in Create/RemoveIssueDependency<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 1 --><!--description Zml4KGFwaSk6IGRyYWZ0IHJlbGVhc2VzIGNvdWxkIGJlIHJlYWQgYmVmb3JlIGJlaW5nIHB1Ymxpc2hlZA==-->fix(api): draft releases could be read before being published<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 2 --><!--description bWlzY29uZmlndXJlZCBzZWN1cml0eSBjaGVja3Mgb24gdGFnIGRlbGV0ZSB3ZWIgZm9ybQ==-->misconfigured security checks on tag delete web form<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 3 --><!--description aW5jb3JyZWN0IGxvZ2ljIGluICJVcGRhdGUgUFIiIGRpZCBub3QgZW5mb3JjZSBoZWFkIGJyYW5jaCBwcm90ZWN0aW9uIHJ1bGVzIGNvcnJlY3RseQ==-->incorrect logic in "Update PR" did not enforce head branch protection rules correctly<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 4 --><!--description aXNzdWUgb3duZXIgY2FuIGRlbGV0ZSBhbm90aGVyIHVzZXIncyBjb21tZW50J3MgZWRpdCBoaXN0b3J5IG9uIHNhbWUgaXNzdWU=-->issue owner can delete another user's comment's edit history on same issue<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 5 --><!--description dGFnIHByb3RlY3Rpb24gcnVsZXMgY2FuIGJlIGJ5cGFzc2VkIGR1cmluZyB0YWcgZGVsZXRlIG9wZXJhdGlvbg==-->tag protection rules can be bypassed during tag delete operation<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Joshua Rogers <MegaManSec@users.noreply.github.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/10176 was unintentionally merged in a state where CI fails.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10186
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
**Backport:** #7025Resolves#6266
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7025
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Dmitrii Sharshakov <d3dx12.xx@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: Dmitrii Sharshakov <d3dx12.xx@gmail.com>
Backported due to `make security-check` failing in `v11.0/forgejo` branch due to a new registered vulnerability in the github.com/nwaples/rardecode.
```
/home/forgejo/go/pkg/mod/golang.org/toolchain@v0.0.1-go1.25.3.linux-amd64/bin/go run golang.org/x/vuln/cmd/govulncheck@v1 ./...
=== Symbol Results ===
Vulnerability #1: GO-2025-4020
DoS risk due to unrestricted RAR dictionary sizes in
github.com/nwaples/rardecode
More info: https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-4020
Module: github.com/nwaples/rardecode
Found in: github.com/nwaples/rardecode@v1.1.3
Fixed in: N/A
Example traces found:
#1: modules/git/repo_commit.go:263:24: git.Repository.CommitsByFileAndRange calls io.ReadFull, which eventually calls rardecode.cipherBlockReader.Read
#2: modules/packages/arch/metadata.go:22:2: arch.init calls archiver.init, which calls rardecode.init
#3: modules/git/repo_language_stats.go:198:32: git.Repository.GetLanguageStats calls bytes.Buffer.ReadFrom, which calls rardecode.limitedReader.Read
Your code is affected by 1 vulnerability from 1 module.
This scan also found 1 vulnerability in packages you import and 0
vulnerabilities in modules you require, but your code doesn't appear to call
these vulnerabilities.
Use '-show verbose' for more details.
exit status 3
make: *** [Makefile:526: security-check] Error 1
```
Co-authored-by: Dmitrii Sharshakov <d3dx12.xx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10043
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Manual backport #9822 to v11.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9828
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [data.forgejo.org/oci/alpine](https://hub.docker.com/_/alpine) ([source](https://github.com/alpinelinux/docker-alpine)) | final | minor | `3.21` -> `3.22` |
---
> ⚠️ **Warning**
>
> Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
---
This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0MS4xNTIuOSIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjQxLjE1Mi45IiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoidjExLjAvZm9yZ2VqbyIsImxhYmVscyI6WyJkZXBlbmRlbmN5LXVwZ3JhZGUiLCJ0ZXN0L25vdC1uZWVkZWQiXX0=-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9826
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [go](https://go.dev/) ([source](https://github.com/golang/go)) | toolchain | minor | `1.24.6` -> `1.25.3` |
| [go](https://go.dev/) ([source](https://github.com/golang/go)) | golang | minor | `1.24` -> `1.25` |
---
> ⚠️ **Warning**
>
> Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
---
This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0MS4xNTIuOSIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjQxLjE1Mi45IiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoidjExLjAvZm9yZ2VqbyIsImxhYmVscyI6WyJkZXBlbmRlbmN5LXVwZ3JhZGUiLCJ0ZXN0L25vdC1uZWVkZWQiXX0=-->
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9821
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
**Backport:** #9773
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9775): <!--number 9775 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Zml4OiBzdHJpY3QgZXJyb3IgaGFuZGxpbmcgb24gY29ycnVwdGVkIERCIG1pZ3JhdGlvbiB0cmFja2luZyB0YWJsZXM=-->fix: strict error handling on corrupted DB migration tracking tables<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9775
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
**Backport:** #9662
Test failure:
```
1) [chromium] › tests/e2e/webauthn.test.e2e.ts:14:1 › WebAuthn register & login flow ─────────────
Error: page.goto: Navigation to "http://localhost:3003/user/login" is interrupted by another navigation to "http://localhost:3003/"
Call log:
- navigating to "http://localhost:3003/user/login", waiting until "load"
46 |
47 | // Login.
> 48 | response = await page.goto('/user/login');
| ^
49 | expect(response?.status()).toBe(200);
50 |
51 | await page.getByLabel('Username or email address').fill(username);
at /workspace/forgejo/forgejo/tests/e2e/webauthn.test.e2e.ts:48:25
```
I have not been able to reproduce this locally.
What seems to be happening is that the current code is clicking the "Sign out" menu option, and then while the browser is busy (navigating to `/logout`, redirecting to `/`), the test attempts to navigate directly to `/user/login`. The two navigations are racey, depending on how fast they work they may result in this error. The proposed fix is to wait for the sign-out operation to complete by waiting for the URL to land on `/`, before then proceeding with the rest of the test with the second login.
Normally this would be *just* a `waitForURL` call. But because of the redirect on logout, I've encountered the below error if the code is just invoking `waitForURL`. So I put the `waitForURL` invocation into an `expect(...).toPass()`. This isn't technically the correct usage of `toPass` which is intended for *assertions* which will eventually become successful, whereas this is attempting to retry a wait... but... a wait shouldn't need a retry. (I'd argue this is a Playwright bug.)
```
Error: page.waitForURL: net::ERR_ABORTED; maybe frame was detached?
```
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9662
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9673
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9504
With forgejo/forgejo#9075 the `GetUserByEmail` now actually only used activated emails. This however broke sending recovery mails to unactivated users, as their email are not yet activated.
Use the newly introduced function `GetUserByEmailSimple` to not care about this activated email requirement and also avoid the no-reply address being a valid email address for this functionality.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9516
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9468
If the keep count of a cleanup rule is greater than the number of available packages, it fails with:
```
panic(boundsError{x: int64(x), signed: true, y: y, code: boundsSliceB})
.../packages/packages.go:175
.../routers/web/org/setting_packages.go:108
```
Regression of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9219/files
Refs https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/9461
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9468): <!--number 9468 --><!--line 0 --><!--description cGFja2FnZSBjbGVhbmVkIHJ1bGUgZmFpbHMgaWYgdGhlIGtlZXAgY291bnQgaXMgdG9vIGhpZ2g=-->package cleaned rule fails if the keep count is too high<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9469
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9362
Do not display the title of unsubscribed issues or pull requests in the notification web page . The title of some random issues or pull requests from repositories were accidentally displayed in the notifications of a user. It was a rare occurrence, caused by an incorrect comparison of two unrelated unique identifiers that are unlikely to match (the id of the notification and the id of a repository). If the issue or the pull request belonged to a private repository to which the user had no read access, only the title was leaked. The user was denied permission to view the issue or the pull request when clicking on the link displayed in the notifications web page.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [x] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Security bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9362): <!--number 9362 --><!--line 0 --><!--description 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-->Do not display the title of unsubscribed issues or pull requests in the notification web page . The title of some random issues or pull requests from repositories were accidentally displayed in the notifications of a user. It was a rare occurrence, caused by an incorrect comparison of two unrelated unique identifiers that are unlikely to match (the id of the notification and the id of a repository). If the issue or the pull request belonged to a private repository to which the user had no read access, only the title was leaked. The user was denied permission to view the issue or the pull request when clicking on the link displayed in the notifications web page.<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9363
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
backport of #9219
---
Before it has only processed the newest 200 (or 50 for default `MAX_RESPONSE_ITEMS: 50`) versions.
After it processes all versions.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9219
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de>
Co-committed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de>
(cherry picked from commit c697de9517)
Conflicts:
tests/integration/api_packages_test.go
Trivial import conflict and missing helper addition
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9232): <!--number 9232 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Zml4OiBwYWNrYWdlIGNsZWFudXAgcnVsZXMgYXJlIG5vdCBhcHBsaWVkIHdoZW4gdGhlcmUgYXJlIG1vcmUgdGhhbiAyMDAgcGFja2FnZXMgKGRlcGVuZHMgb24gYE1BWF9SRVNQT05TRV9JVEVNU2ApICgjOTIxOSk=-->fix: package cleanup rules are not applied when there are more than 200 packages (depends on `MAX_RESPONSE_ITEMS`) (#9219)<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9232
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9241
AssertExistsAndLoadBean has a side effect on its argument. When retrying in a loop, it must use the non modified argument, otherwise it is bound to return the same row as the first failure and render the retry useless.
Refs forgejo/forgejo#9236
---
Without this fix it fails 100% of the time locally on testify v1.11 because it runs the test before waiting https://github.com/stretchr/testify/pull/1427
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9242
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9202
After https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22385 introduced LFS GC, it never worked due to a bug in the INI library: fields in structs embedded more than one level deep are not populated from the INI file.
This PR fixes the issue by replacing the multi-level embedded struct with a single-level struct for parsing the cron.gc_lfs configuration.
Added a new test for retrieving cron settings to demonstrate the bug in the INI package.
---
Fix#9048 by cherrypicking the fix from Gitea
Gitea PR: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/35198
Confirmed to work on my own instance, I now see the cron schedule for gc_lfs listed in the site admin menu where it was empty before
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9202): <!--number 9202 --><!--line 0 --><!--description TEZTIEdDIGlzIG5ldmVyIHJ1bm5pbmcgYmVjYXVzZSBvZiBhIGJ1ZyBpbiB0aGUgcGFyc2luZyBvZiB0aGUgSU5JIGZpbGU=-->LFS GC is never running because of a bug in the parsing of the INI file<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Andrew Cassidy <drewcassidy@me.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9222
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [https://data.forgejo.org/infrastructure/next-digest](https://data.forgejo.org/infrastructure/next-digest) | action | minor | `v1.1.0` -> `v1.2.0` |
---
### Release Notes
<details>
<summary>infrastructure/next-digest (https://data.forgejo.org/infrastructure/next-digest)</summary>
### [`v1.2.0`](https://data.forgejo.org/infrastructure/next-digest/compare/v1.1.0...v1.2.0)
[Compare Source](https://data.forgejo.org/infrastructure/next-digest/compare/v1.1.0...v1.2.0)
</details>
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC), Automerge - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
---
This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0MS43Ni4wIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiNDEuNzYuMCIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6ImZvcmdlam8iLCJsYWJlbHMiOlsiZGVwZW5kZW5jeS11cGdyYWRlIiwidGVzdC9ub3QtbmVlZGVkIl19-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9157
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
(cherry picked from commit 7af04391a3)
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9071
All PUT/DELETE routes in the web UI are validated to prevent a [cross site request forgery](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-site_request_forgery). Although all POST routes are validated with a CSRF token, some of the PUT/DELETE routes were missing this validation.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Security bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9071): <!--number 9071 --><!--line 0 --><!--description dmFsaWRhdGUgQ1NSRiBvbiBub24tc2FmZSBtZXRob2Rz-->validate CSRF on non-safe methods<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9081
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9076
When the primary email is changed before it is validated, the URL sent for validation purposes must be invalidated. It was previously possible use to delay use of the URL to validate the primary email and modify the primary email in the meantime. It allowed to validate the newer primary email using the older primary email, effectively bypassing validation.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Security bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9076): <!--number 9076 --><!--line 0 --><!--description ZGVsZXRlIG9sZCBhdXRoIHRva2VuIHVwb24gcmVwbGFjaW5nIHByaW1hcnkgZW1haWw=-->delete old auth token upon replacing primary email<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9086
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9070
Obtaining a [personal access token via the API](https://forgejo.org/docs/latest/user/api-usage/#generating-and-listing-api-tokens) is no longer possible if the password used for basic authentication is an API token or an [OAuth2 token](https://forgejo.org/docs/latest/user/api-usage/#oauth2-provider): it has to be the user password. Such privilege escalation was only possible for tokens with write permissions to the user.
This requirement is already enforced when API calls are made with an authorization header [as described in the documentation](https://forgejo.org/docs/latest/user/api-usage/#authentication), but it was not enforced with basic authentication. As a consequence it was possible for an API token with `write:user` permissions or an OAuth2 token to obtain a new token with a wider or identical scope.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9070): <!--number 9070 --><!--line 0 --><!--description cmVxdWlyZSBwYXNzd29yZCBsb2dpbiBmb3IgY3JlYXRpb24gb2YgbmV3IHRva2Vu-->require password login for creation of new token<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9079
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9075
Only validated emails can be used to:
- assert if a signature can be trusted or,
- to assign comments, issues to an existing user during a migration
The emails that were not yet validated could previously used as if they were validated, incorrectly showing commits as trusted or assigning comments, issues to the user associated with this email during migrations.
Existing migrations are not modified when they were incorrectly assigned to an email that is not validated. The trust status of all commit signatures will now show differently depending on the validation status of an email.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Security bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9075): <!--number 9075 --><!--line 0 --><!--description ZW5zdXJlIEdldFVzZXJCeUVtYWlsIG9ubHkgY29uc2lkZXJzIHZhbGlkYXRlZCBlbWFpbHM=-->ensure GetUserByEmail only considers validated emails<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9084
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9064**
It is no longer possible to specify the user and password when providing a URL for migrating a repository, the fields dedicated to that purpose on the form must be used instead. This is to prevent that those credentials are displayed in the repository settings that are visible by the repository admins, in the case where the migration is a mirror.
Co-authored-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9065
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Backport of the fixes for #8529 (v11 is currently not affected because minio-client is an older version. Porting the tests should help in preventing future breakages).
- #8541: storage test (reader should not get closed)
- #8527#8816: defer uploader.Close (most robust way)
- #8166: enable storage tests
The test can be run locally:
```
docker run --rm -e MINIO_DOMAIN=minio -e MINIO_ROOT_USER=123456 -e MINIO_ROOT_PASSWORD=12345678 -p 9000:9000 data.forgejo.org/oci/bitnami/minio:2024.8.17
```
```
TEST_MINIO_ENDPOINT=localhost:9000 go test -v -run ^TestMinioStorageIterator$ ./modules/storage
```
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9031
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8678
- Even though the test file contains some good extensive testing, it didn't bother to actually call `/login/oauth/access_token` to see if the received code actually resulted into a access token.
- The fix itself is... well yeah self-explanatory.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#8669
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8678): <!--number 8678 --><!--line 0 --><!--description c3RvcmUgY29kZSBjaGFsbGVuZ2UgY29ycmVjdGx5IGluIHNlc3Npb24=-->store code challenge correctly in session<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8974
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8864**
The status of two jobs by the same name shadow each other, they need to be distinct. If two jobs by the same name are found, they are made distinct by adding a -<occurence number> suffix.
Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#8648
(cherry picked from commit 6bc1803c70)
```
Conflicts:
services/actions/notifier_helper.go
services/actions/schedule_tasks.go
services/actions/workflows.go
trivial context conflicts
services/actions/job_parser.go
use "github.com/nektos/act/pkg/jobparser"
```
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8884
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [go](https://go.dev/) ([source](https://github.com/golang/go)) | toolchain | patch | `1.24.3` -> `1.24.6` |
---
> ⚠️ **Warning**
>
> Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
---
This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0MS41MS4xIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiNDEuNTEuMSIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6InYxMS4wL2Zvcmdlam8iLCJsYWJlbHMiOlsiZGVwZW5kZW5jeS11cGdyYWRlIiwidGVzdC9ub3QtbmVlZGVkIl19-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8811
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [https://data.forgejo.org/forgejo/forgejo-build-publish](https://data.forgejo.org/forgejo/forgejo-build-publish) | action | patch | `v5.3.4` -> `v5.3.5` |
---
> ⚠️ **Warning**
>
> Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.
---
### Release Notes
<details>
<summary>forgejo/forgejo-build-publish (https://data.forgejo.org/forgejo/forgejo-build-publish)</summary>
### [`v5.3.5`](https://data.forgejo.org/forgejo/forgejo-build-publish/compare/v5.3.4...v5.3.5)
[Compare Source](https://data.forgejo.org/forgejo/forgejo-build-publish/compare/v5.3.4...v5.3.5)
</details>
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
---
This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0MS40Mi41IiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiNDEuNDIuNSIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6InYxMS4wL2Zvcmdlam8iLCJsYWJlbHMiOlsiZGVwZW5kZW5jeS11cGdyYWRlIiwidGVzdC9ub3QtbmVlZGVkIl19-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8645
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8611
As far as I can see and tell, the newest webkit version contains a regression that makes this specific test fail. The screenshots that are uploaded upon failure do not seem to suggest that this test should fail.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8614
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8530
Log the right stack frame line. We currently always show the `apiError` method call.
related to #8529
Co-authored-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8531
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8460
- I cannot give a good rationale why Mobile Safari and webkit is failing this test quite consistently and also succeed quite often. We add a script to ensure that we get a mismatched URL - but these two browsers either ignore this script sometime or delays the execution until after the root URL check is done.
- Because it is very hard to run webkit and mobile safari without running a heavily containerized environment (without a graphical interface) it is near impossible to debug this issue properly; save ourselves a headache and disable it instead. I find it more likely to be a problem with my playwright test than it to be a problem with the mismatched root URL code.
- Ref forgejo/forgejo#8359
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8465
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8461
- In `test.beforeEach` the browser is navigated to `/user2/repo1/pulls/5` and the test environment is prepared by making sure the pull request is not WIP. At the start of `simple toggle` the browser is navigated to the same URL (and the browser is already on this URL) which the Mobile Chrome browser does not handle gracefully and reliably errors with `net::ERR_ABORTED`.
- Because we are already at that URL, do not try to navigate to it again.
- I cannot offer a rationale why the Mobile Chrome browser does give a error when this happens in subsequent tests of 'Pull: Toggle WIP'.
- Ref forgejo/forgejo#8359
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8462
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8189**
This is a clean cherry-pick codewise. There was a minor conflict to resolve in the tests:
```
Conflicts:
tests/integration/patch_status_test.go
the test file did not exist at all in v11 and was added as is with
one exception: `ObjectFormat: optional.Some("sha256"),` was
commented out.
```
---
Automerge can be ignored when the following race happens:
* Conflict check is happening on a repository and
`pr.Status = issues_model.PullRequestStatusChecking` for all open pull
requests (this happens every time a pull request is merged).
* While the conflict check is ongoing, an event (Forgejo Actions being
successful for instance) happens and and `StartPRCheckAndAutoMerge*` is called.
* Because `pr.CanAutoMerge()` is false, the pull request is not
selected and not added to the automerge queue.
* When the conflict check completes and `pr.CanAutoMerge()` becomes
true, there no longer is a task in the auto merge queue and the
auto merge does not happen.
This is fixed by adding a task to the auto merge queue when the conflict check for a pull request completes. This is done when the mutx protecting the conflict check task is released to prevent a deadlock when a synchronous queues are used in the following situation:
* the conflict check task finds the pull request is mergeable
* it schedules the auto merge tasks that finds it must be merged
* merging concludes with scheduling a conflict check task
Avoid an extra loop where a conflict check task queues an auto merge task that will schedule a conflict check task if the pull request can be merged. The auto merge row is removed from the database before merging. It would otherwise be removed after the merge commit is received via the git hook which happens asynchronously and can lead to a race.
StartPRCheckAndAutoMerge is modified to re-use HeadCommitID when available, such as when called after a pull request conflict check.
---
A note on tests: they cover the new behavior, i.e. automerge being triggered by a successful conflict check. This is also on the critical paths for every test that involve creating, merging or updating a pull request.
- `tests/integration/git_test.go`
- `tests/integration/actions_commit_status_test.go`
- `tests/integration/api_helper_for_declarative_test.go`
- `tests/integration/patch_status_test.go`
- `tests/integration/pull_merge_test.go`
The [missing fixture file](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8189/files#diff-b86fdd79108b3ba3cb2e56ffcfd1be2a7b32f46c) for the auto merge table can be verified to be necessary simply by removing it an observing that the integration tests fail.
The [scheduling of the auto merge task](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8189/files#diff-9489262e93967f6bb2db41837f37c06f4e70d978) in `testPR` can be verified to be required by moving it in the `testPRProtected` function and observing that the tests hang forever because of the deadlock.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8189): <!--number 8189 --><!--line 0 --><!--description ZG8gbm90IGlnbm9yZSBhdXRvbWVyZ2Ugd2hpbGUgYSBQUiBpcyBjaGVja2luZyBmb3IgY29uZmxpY3Rz-->do not ignore automerge while a PR is checking for conflicts<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8456
Reviewed-by: Lucas <sclu1034@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
**Backport of** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8258, cherry picked from commit cee2aae4ca
Manual adjustments:
- rename the migration file from `v36` to `v29`
- added the `//nolint:revive`
---
Closes#8119, follow-up of #8234 (**backported in #8237**)
## Testing
- go to a commit before #8234 (e.g.
285f66b782)
- create 3 repositories
- save the wiki settings of the second, without any change
- set the wiki of the third to be globally writable
- verify the `default_permissions` column in the database, of the unit
`5`: 0, 2, 3
- stop Forgejo, switch to this PR and start Forgejo
- verify that the logs writes `Migration[35]: Fix wiki unit default
permission`
- verify the `default_permissions` column in the database, of the unit
`5`: 0, 0, 3
Before:
After:
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else
to do it.
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8445
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8400
- This test is the source of many transient errors https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/8359#issuecomment-5655557 and is semi-reproducible locally. Any debugging code that is added will result in the error no longer being reproducible, making it hard to say why this is failing.
- It no longer seems necessary to add this `waitForURL` call as Playwright now seems to gracefully handle the case where we want to go to a specific page while playwright might still be navigating to another URL that was initiated by clicking on a button - thus removing the source of the transient error altogether.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8401
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8367
- Right before the call to user email activation, the user is updated [^1]. This causes the email to be lowered, which in turn makes the call to activate the user activation fail (on database where collation is case sensitive, which is the recommend collation by Forgejo).
- The code in `BeforeUpdate` is quite confusing, the comment has become slightly out of date and was reworded to reflect reality and its purpose. The code is also slightly reworked to only lower the email for the `AvatarEmail` field to avoid causing side-effect.
- Added unit test.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#8354
[^1]: 4927d4ee3d/routers/web/auth/auth.go (L785)
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8385
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8326
- fix: make API /repos/{owner}/{repo}/compare/{basehead} work with forks
- add test coverage for both fixes and the underlying function `parseCompareInfo`
- refactor and improve part of the helpers from `tests/integration/api_helper_for_declarative_test.go`
- remove a few wrong or misleading comments
Refs forgejo/forgejo#7978
---
Note that this is a partial backport for reasons explained at https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8326
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
### Documentation
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8333): <!--number 8333 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Zml4OiBtYWtlIEFQSSAvcmVwb3Mve293bmVyfS97cmVwb30vY29tcGFyZS97YmFzZWhlYWR9IHdvcmsgd2l0aCBmb3Jrcw==-->fix: make API /repos/{owner}/{repo}/compare/{basehead} work with forks<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8333
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Translation updates that were relevant to v11 branch were picked from this commit:
414199fc66 (PR #8238)
Changes to strings that are only present in the v12 branch were not picked.
Below is a list of co-authors of the ported commit. It may contain co-authors who's changes were not picked due to only being relevant to v12.
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: AzzyDev <azzydev@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: BarryLhm <barrylhm@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Benedikt Straub <benedikt-straub@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Codeberg Translate <translate@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Dirk <dirk@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Edgarsons <edgarsons@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: EssGeeEich <essgeeeich@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Fjuro <git@alius.cz>
Co-authored-by: Juno Takano <jutty@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Laurent FAVOLE <lfavole@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Outbreak2096 <outbreak2096@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Shihfu Juan <xlion@xlion.tw>
Co-authored-by: SomeTr <sometr@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: VaiTon <vaiton@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Vyxie <kitakita@disroot.org>
Co-authored-by: mahlzahn <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Co-authored-by: xtex <xtexchooser@duck.com>
Translation updates that were relevant to v11 branch were picked from this commit:
42ea73d46f
Changes to strings that are only present in the v12 branch were not picked.
Below is a list of co-authors of the ported commit. It may contain co-authors who's changes were not picked due to only being relevant to v12.
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Benedikt Straub <benedikt-straub@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Codeberg Translate <translate@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Dirk <dirk@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Edgarsons <edgarsons@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Fjuro <git@alius.cz>
Co-authored-by: Juno Takano <jutty@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Laurent FAVOLE <lfavole@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Lzebulon <lzebulon@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Outbreak2096 <outbreak2096@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: SomeTr <sometr@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Tin <hntin@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Vyxie <kitakita@disroot.org>
Co-authored-by: earl-warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: hntin <hntin@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: janAkali <janakali@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: justbispo <justbispo@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: tacaly <frederick@tacaly.com>
Co-authored-by: volkan <volkan@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: xtex <xtexchooser@duck.com>
Co-authored-by: yeager <yeager@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: yurtpage <yurtpage@noreply.codeberg.org>
Translation updates that were relevant to v11 branch were picked from this commit:
fe28f128df
Changes to strings that are only present in the v12 branch were not picked.
Below is a list of co-authors of the ported commit. It may contain co-authors who's changes were not picked due to only being relevant to v12.
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Benedikt Straub <benedikt-straub@web.de>
Co-authored-by: BlackSpirits <blackspirits@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Codeberg Translate <translate@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Edgarsons <edgarsons@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Fjuro <git@alius.cz>
Co-authored-by: Juno Takano <jutty@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Outbreak2096 <outbreak2096@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Salif Mehmed <mail@salif.eu>
Co-authored-by: Shihfu Juan <xlion@xlion.tw>
Co-authored-by: SomeTr <sometr@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Vyxie <kitakita@disroot.org>
Co-authored-by: Wuzzy <wuzzy@disroot.org>
Co-authored-by: earl-warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: gedankenstuecke <gedankenstuecke@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: justbispo <justbispo@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: nightfurysl2001 <nightfurysl2001@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: xtex <xtexchooser@duck.com>
Co-authored-by: yeager <yeager@noreply.codeberg.org>
Translation updates that were relevant to v11 branch were picked from this commit:
805e749a15
Changes to strings that are only present in the v12 branch were not picked.
Below is a list of co-authors of the ported commit. It may contain co-authors who's changes were not picked due to only being relevant to v12.
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: AzzyDev <azzydev@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Benedikt Straub <benedikt-straub@web.de>
Co-authored-by: BlackSpirits <blackspirits@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Codeberg Translate <translate@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Dirk <dirk@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Edgarsons <edgarsons@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Fjuro <git@alius.cz>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Juno Takano <jutty@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Laurent FAVOLE <lfavole@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Lzebulon <lzebulon@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Outbreak2096 <outbreak2096@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Shihfu Juan <xlion@xlion.tw>
Co-authored-by: SomeTr <sometr@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Vyxie <kitakita@disroot.org>
Co-authored-by: artnay <artnay@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: earl-warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: fnetX <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: justbispo <justbispo@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: kwoot <kwoot@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: milimarg <milimarg@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: nightfurysl2001 <nightfurysl2001@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: oscarotero <oscarotero@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: pomp <pomp@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: rdsq <rdsq@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: tacaly <frederick@tacaly.com>
Co-authored-by: volkan <volkan@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: xtex <xtexchooser@duck.com>
Translation updates that were relevant to v11 branch were picked from this commit:
40d678d4b9
Changes to strings that are only present in the v12 branch were not picked.
Below is a list of co-authors of the ported commit. It may contain co-authors who's changes were not picked due to only being relevant to v12.
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Benedikt Straub <benedikt-straub@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Codeberg Translate <translate@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Dirk <dirk@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Edgarsons <edgarsons@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Fjuro <git@alius.cz>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Infernus <infernus@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Juno Takano <jutty@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Kita Ikuyo <kitakita@disroot.org>
Co-authored-by: Miguel P.L <miguel_pl@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Outbreak2096 <outbreak2096@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: SomeTr <sometr@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Wuzzy <wuzzy@disroot.org>
Co-authored-by: artnay <artnay@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: hugoalh <hugoalh@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: huskee <huskee@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: justbispo <justbispo@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: kwoot <kwoot@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: milimarg <milimarg@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: nekoedges <nekoedges@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: oscarotero <oscarotero@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: smlxdesign <smlxdesign@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: tacaly <frederick@tacaly.com>
Co-authored-by: xtex <xtexchooser@duck.com>
Translation updates that were relevant to v11 branch were picked from this commit:
121623582a
Changes to strings that are only present in the v12 branch were not picked.
Below is a list of co-authors of the ported commit. It may contain co-authors who's changes were not picked due to only being relevant to v12.
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Codeberg Translate <translate@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Coral Pink <coralpink@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Edgarsons <edgarsons@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Fjuro <git@alius.cz>
Co-authored-by: Ricky-Tigg <ricky-tigg@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: SomeTr <sometr@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: guillerpsanchez <guillerpsanchez@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: hook <hook@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: milimarg <milimarg@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: pixelcode <pixelcode@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: xtex <xtexchooser@duck.com>
Translation updates that were relevant to v11 branch were picked from this commit:
e9ec11df4b
Changes to strings that are only present in the v12 branch were not picked.
Below is a list of co-authors of the ported commit. It may contain co-authors who's changes were not picked due to only being relevant to v12.
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos <fito@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Atul_Eterno <atul_eterno@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Benedikt Straub <benedikt-straub@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Caesar Schinas <caesar@caesarschinas.com>
Co-authored-by: Codeberg Translate <translate@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Dirk <dirk@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Edgarsons <edgarsons@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Fjuro <fjuro@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: GiannosOB <giannosob@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Hiers <hiers@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Juno Takano <jutty@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Kita Ikuyo <kitakita@disroot.org>
Co-authored-by: Miguel P.L <miguel_pl@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Outbreak2096 <outbreak2096@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Ricky-Tigg <ricky-tigg@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: SomeTr <sometr@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Xinayder <xinayder@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: ZilloweZ <zillowez@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: antaanimosity <antaanimosity@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: artnay <artnay@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: earl-warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: justbispo <justbispo@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: mahlzahn <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Co-authored-by: otf31 <otf31@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: ruikkaa <ruikkaa@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: tacaly <frederick@tacaly.com>
Co-authored-by: thodorisl <thodorisl@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: xtex <xtexchooser@duck.com>
**Manual Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8170
The line continuation code in the Markdown editor ignored Enter presses if Ctrl, Alt or Shift were being held. This now also accounts for Cmd on macOS (which browsers represent as metaKey).
### Tests
- Use Safari (on macOS)
- create a new issue in a repository
- start writing a list (with - one[enter]- two)
- now press Cmd+Enter
- verify that while the form is being submitted, no new line got visually added
(cherry picked from commit 39e6785da0)
Co-authored-by: Danko Aleksejevs <danko@very.lv>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8262
Reviewed-by: Danko Aleksejevs <danko@very.lv>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8234fixes: #8119, replaces #8135
Bug likely introduced in 5eeccecafc
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
### Documentation
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8237
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: oliverpool <oliverpool@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8155
* convert updateRepoUnits to not rely on ctx to retrieve the repo
* Add integration test
* do not activate releases if `wiki: true`. This is unexpected and there is no evidence it is necessary.
Refs https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/8082
---
The test is minimal for the sake of backporting. It is verified to reproduce the bug if the fix is not present.
```sh
$ make TAGS='sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify' 'test-sqlite#TestAPIRepoMigrate'
...
=== TestAPIRepoMigrate (tests/integration/api_repo_test.go:388)
--- FAIL: TestAPIRepoMigrate (1.12s)
testlogger.go:411: 2025/06/11 17:38:22 ...les/storage/local.go:33:NewLocalStorage() [I] Creating new Local Storage at /home/earl-warren/software/forgejo/tests/gitea-lfs-meta
testlogger.go:411: 2025/06/11 17:38:22 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed GET /user/login for test-mock:12345, 200 OK in 2.1ms @ auth/auth.go:145(auth.SignIn)
testlogger.go:411: 2025/06/11 17:38:22 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed POST /user/login for test-mock:12345, 303 See Other in 2.1ms @ auth/auth.go:179(auth.SignInPost)
testlogger.go:411: 2025/06/11 17:38:22 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed GET /user/settings/applications for test-mock:12345, 200 OK in 3.8ms @ setting/applications.go:25(setting.Applications)
testlogger.go:411: 2025/06/11 17:38:22 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed POST /user/settings/applications for test-mock:12345, 303 See Other in 5.1ms @ setting/applications.go:35(setting.ApplicationsPost)
testlogger.go:411: 2025/06/11 17:38:22 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed GET /user/settings/applications for test-mock:12345, 200 OK in 2.9ms @ setting/applications.go:25(setting.Applications)
testlogger.go:411: 2025/06/11 17:38:23 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed POST /api/v1/repos/migrate for test-mock:12345, 0 in 992.0ms @ repo/migrate.go:38(repo.Migrate)
api_repo_test.go:400:
Error Trace: /home/earl-warren/software/forgejo/tests/integration/api_repo_test.go:400
Error: Not equal:
expected: 201
actual : 200
Test: TestAPIRepoMigrate
api_repo_test.go:402:
Error Trace: /home/earl-warren/software/forgejo/tests/integration/integration_test.go:649
/home/earl-warren/software/forgejo/tests/integration/api_repo_test.go:402
Error: Received unexpected error:
EOF
Test: TestAPIRepoMigrate
```
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8155): <!--number 8155 --><!--line 0 --><!--description ZG8gbm90IGZhaWwgd2hlbiByZWxlYXNlIG9yIHdpa2kgaXMgc2V0IGluIGAvcmVwb3MvbWlncmF0ZWAgQVBJ-->do not fail when release or wiki is set in `/repos/migrate` API<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8167
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8112Fixes#6983.
I suppose a change like this doesn't require any testing?
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Co-authored-by: Malte Jürgens <maltejur@dismail.de>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8120
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
The PR contains the following changes:
- Revert the direct update to 2.5.1
- Cherry-pick the update to v2.5.0 first (containing the auto fuzzy change)
- Cherry-pick update to v2.5.2
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8110
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Shiny Nematoda <snematoda.751k2@aleeas.com>
Co-committed-by: Shiny Nematoda <snematoda.751k2@aleeas.com>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8094
- Include organisations with visibility of limited if the visitor is signed in.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#8093
- Added unit test.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8095
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
manual backport of #8054
---
Package isn't references, typescript-eslint still pulls it transitive which is the recommend way
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8057
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de>
Co-committed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8021
The following will trigger a XORM warning:
```
type Repository struct {
ID int64 `xorm:"pk autoincr"`
Topics []string `xorm:"TEXT JSON NOT NULL"`
}
```
that looks like:
```
[W] Table repository Column topics db default is '', struct default is
```
it cannot be resolved because:
- SQLite requires a default when there is a NOT NULL
- MySQL forbids a default for TEXT
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8022
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7987
- If a review was requested from a deleted team, use the ghost team for the comment aggregator.
- ResolvesCodeberg/Community#1952
- Unit test added.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8000
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7986
- The `/api/actions/runner.v1.RunnerService/FetchTask` route is continuously polling for its next task, because long-polling is not implemented this request is made every second. The `/api/actions/runner.v1.RunnerService/UpdateLog` route is used to send new logs of the CI runs that are currently happening.
- Just like the assets requests, they spam the logs and should only be logged at a lower log level.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Features
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7986): <!--number 7986 --><!--line 0 --><!--description bWFrZSBGb3JnZWpvIEFjdGlvbnMgc2VydmVyIGxvZ3MgbGVzcyBub2lzeQ==-->make Forgejo Actions server logs less noisy<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7991
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7976
- Expired artifacts are kept in the database but the artifact has been deleted from the storage. Ignore them for the quota calculation.
- Added unit test.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7985
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7894
Followup to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7746.
`auto-flow` was not needed here, because the amount of items in the grid is expected. Rely on a more predictable `grid-template-columns` definition.
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7903
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7884
- `change-id` is a commit header set by [jj-vcs](https://jj-vcs.github.io/jj/). Modify the commit parser to consider this header to be a valid header, this in turn fixes the signature validation on git commits that contain this header.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#7836
- Added unit test.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7887
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7883
- Chromium would unselect the text if some text is written in another element, so temporarily store the range and restore after this writing has happened.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#7841
- No E2E test, there is already a test case that perfectly matches the reproduce steps of this bug, however Chromium does not produce consistent behavior on this case.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7886
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7817
When using an oauth provider for login, we can't always make sure that only supported characters are included in the name. Therefore there exist normalization rules for the username. In German some names contain the `ß` letter which usually gets replaces by `ss`. Therfore I added this to the `customCharsReplacement` list.
Without this fix, the user get's un undescriptive internal server error and the log states `CreateUser: name is invalid [<name>]: must be valid alpha or numeric or dash(-_) or dot characters`.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Kilimnik <daniel@neodyme.io>
Co-authored-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7821
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7640
Currently, if you have a mirrored repo, the button on the "branches"
page to create a new branch is available to be pressed. Once you name
your new branch and click submit, you get a 404 page that doesn't explain
what went wrong.
As new branch creation is not supported on mirrored repos, let's just
take that button away if the repo is a mirror. This is already done for
archived repos, so we just need to add another check.
Fixes#7639.
Co-authored-by: John Moon <john.moon@vts-i.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7869
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
On large screens, use grid to force right position of the button.
On small screens, just left it hang out wherever it fits. It's not possible to not make it hide behind mergebox while keeping `float`, and with grid it would overflow too much.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7746
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0383e2e15a)
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7784
- Document that `is_system_webhook` field is accepted for the `POST /admin/hooks` endpoint.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7786
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7773
- I was not able to find a reasoning in the pull request (https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/9784) for the existence of this `time.Sleep`. The best I could come up with during manual testing is that there's a brief moment where 'this pull request is missing fork information' is shown, this was caused by an incorrect condition.
- Added integration test.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7774
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Test two scenarios:
1. Account linking is set to `auto` and tries to link against a user who
is enrolled into Webauthn should show 2FA screen.
2. User is already linked and logins via OAuth2 and is enrolled into
WebAuthn should show 2FA screen.
(cherry picked from commit aa4ae81fe0)
- Currently during external login (such as OAuth2), if the user is
enrolled into Webauthn and not enrolled into TOTP then no 2FA is being
done during external login and when account linking is set to `auto` then
also during automatic linking. This results in bypassing the 2FA of the
user.
- Create a new unified function that checks if the user is enrolled into
2FA and use this when necessary. Rename the old `HasTwoFactorByUID`
function to `HasTOTPByUID` which is a more appropiate naming.
(cherry picked from commit df5d656827)
Conflicts:
the original commit was trimmed down to be fit for backport
- A permission check is done when incoming SSH connections are handled (this is
run before git hooks). If this check is for write access and AGit flow
is supported, then this check is degraded to a read check. The
motivation behind this is that for AGit flow the user does not need
write permissions but only read permissions.
- The `if` condition cannot check if this is for AGit flow, as the Git
protocol has not run yet and thus has to delay this permission check.
This `if` condition failed to consider that this also might be run for
LFS which does not care about AGit flow and would not do a delayed
permission check, so ensure that this degradition only happens when the
`git-receive-pack` command is being run (which roughly equals to `git
push`).
- Clarify code comment.
- Added integration test.
(cherry picked from commit 60c1af244a)
**Backport:** #7715
- Replaces `github.com/go-testfixtures/testfixtures` with a homebrew solution that is fully compatible.
- The reason to replace this library is that it pulls in a lot of other libraries which is causing issues: (1) the test binary becomes bigger than necessary which really shows in incremental build times (this patch removes 27.6MiB of the integration test binary) (2) it pulls in libraries (mainly database drivers) that are not used and are not easy to upgrade in case of a security vulnerability, causing CI failures.
(cherry picked from commit 32e64ccd34)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7729
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7720
In order to improve the security of the Forgejo infrastructure the next-digest repository was moved to a private instance.
## Testing
- After the merge, trigger a mirror to build a new v12.0-test release
- Verify in experimental that the workflows works as expected
- Verify v12.next.forgejo.org is upgraded with the latest commit
- Once the test completes
- Tag for backport to v11 & v7
- Manual backport to v7 because it conflicts
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7723
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7687
It is not an error for a remote user to not be promoted: this is the case for all users created via OAuth. Displaying an error is confusing to the admin when seen in the logs.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/7681
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7691
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7683
- The OAuthCallback code that is responsible for creating a new user, if one does not exist yet, did not use `[service].ALLOW_ONLY_EXTERNAL_REGISTRATION` as default value for the restricted field of a user.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#7681
- Add integration test.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7688
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7650
A regression was introduced in Forgejo v11.0 that caused the edit page of a runner (e.g. https://example.org/admin/actions/runners/434) to no longer display the tasks associated with the runner.
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/7643
---
When the fix is absent, the tests fail like so:
```
--- FAIL: TestRunnerDetails (0.03s)
--- FAIL: TestRunnerDetails/first_page (0.00s)
runners_test.go:36:
Error Trace: /home/earl-warren/software/forgejo/routers/web/shared/actions/runners_test.go:36
Error: "[]" should have 30 item(s), but has 0
Test: TestRunnerDetails/first_page
--- FAIL: TestRunnerDetails/second_and_last_page (0.00s)
runners_test.go:43:
Error Trace: /home/earl-warren/software/forgejo/routers/web/shared/actions/runners_test.go:43
Error: "[]" should have 10 item(s), but has 0
Test: TestRunnerDetails/second_and_last_page
FAIL
FAIL forgejo.org/routers/web/shared/actions 0.170s
```
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- User Interface bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7650): <!--number 7650 --><!--line 0 --><!--description ZGlzcGxheSB0aGUgbGlzdCBvZiB0YXNrcyBpbiB0aGUgcnVubmVyIGVkaXQgcGFnZQ==-->display the list of tasks in the runner edit page<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- User Interface bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7650): <!--number 7650 --><!--line 0 --><!--description ZGlzcGxheSB0aGUgbGlzdCBvZiB0YXNrcyBpbiB0aGUgcnVubmVyIGVkaXQgcGFnZQ==-->display the list of tasks in the runner edit page<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7652
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7648
The only parameter that is ever used is a single directory, make it that only instead of a more complex option structure.
Remove tests.AddFixtures that was the simpler form because it is now redundant.
---
Backporting to v11.0 will help with automated backporting of bug fixes in need of custom made fixtures.
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7649
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
- The pagination labels 'First', 'Previous', 'Next' and 'Last' are
hidden away when the screen width becomes smaller. However this also
hides them from the screen reader. Instead of using `display: none`, use
some well-known tricks to still make them visible to the screen reader.
- Add E2E test.
- ResolvesCodeberg/Community#1858
(cherry picked from commit b6072496d4)
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7594
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/7591
Followup to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6203
Without the 3rd commit, when this test runs, an error message appears in the logs:
```
[E] Missing translation "incorrect_root_url"
```
With it, it does not. No changes to the actual locale handling are expected and I'm hoping there's enough other testing in place for that.
Reported-by: Paweł Bogusławski <pboguslawski@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7599
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7597
- Delay the writing of `trace.dat` to the forgejo diagnosis zip file. It's not possible to write `cpu-profile.dat` and `trace.dat` at the same time. This caused the implemention to prematurely close `cpu-profile.dat` and leave it as an empty file.
- Regression of forgejo/forgejo#6470
## Testing
1. Go to `/admin/monitor`
2. Click on "Download diagnosis report"
3. Open the zip file and check that all files are non-empty.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7601
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7581
Followup to _many PRs_ where the old switches were converted to this one.
The main change here is to the switch with counter. It was missing a gap.
Additionally, it removes tailwind helpers the other switches retained from before switch refactors, because they are now using gap.
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7589
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7584
Followup to #6523
Reverts icon change introduced in #5695
It went unnoticed since v10 and was likely caused by bad copy paste and I don't think it's really worth a test.
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7585
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7558
- forgejo/forgejo#7187 removed the usage of `reference column` class names, however some javascript code depended on it. Adjust this code to instead use the new class `branch-tag-item`.
- Ref: forgejo/forgejo#7187
## Testing
- visit a compare tag page
- see it is possible search for a tag
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7559
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7543
If not a migration will show a warning:
`[W] Table public.package_blob column hash_blake2b db type is VARCHAR(255), struct type is CHAR(128)`
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7544
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7520
- When looking for an existing blob, has_blake2b will be null when it was created prior to v26 migration in v11, when the field was introduced.
- Add unit test and minimal refactoring to load fixtures. The AddFixture function should not be where it currently is because it cannot be used by some packages (circular import). But that's a refactor that needs to be elsewhere for backporting purposes.
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/7519
When the fix is missing, the test fails like so:
```
--- FAIL: TestPackagesGetOrInsertBlob (0.03s)
--- FAIL: TestPackagesGetOrInsertBlob/exists_and_blake2b_is_null_in_the_database (0.00s)
package_blob_test.go:55:
Error Trace: /home/earl-warren/software/forgejo/models/packages/package_blob_test.go:55
Error: Not equal:
expected: true
actual : false
Test: TestPackagesGetOrInsertBlob/exists_and_blake2b_is_null_in_the_database
package_blob_test.go:56:
Error Trace: /home/earl-warren/software/forgejo/models/packages/package_blob_test.go:56
Error: Expected value not to be nil.
Test: TestPackagesGetOrInsertBlob/exists_and_blake2b_is_null_in_the_database
```
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7521
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7261
- When trying to view a submodule directory via the normal `/src/branch/` path, generate a redirect link to the submodule location.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#5267
Co-authored-by: Gnarwhal <git.aspect893@passmail.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7450
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7421
- When migrating a pull requests from a Gitea or Forgejo instance, check if the pull request was created via the AGit flow and transfer that bit of information to the migrated pull request.
- Expose this bit of information as the `flow` field for the pull request.
- We have to do a horrible Go hack with Gitea's [go-sdk](gitea.com/gitea/go-sdk) to list all pull requests while being able to decode it to a struct that contains the new `Flow` field. The library does not allow you to do this out of the box, so we have to use `go:linkname` to access the private method that allows us to do this. This in turn means we have to do some boilerplate code that the library otherwise would do for us. The better option would be forking, but that would be a hassle of keeping the library in sync.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#5848
- Unit test added.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7437
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport of forgejo/forgejo#7422**
- Add new translations, if an existing one couldn't be used.
- Use existing translations, if one existed and fit the purpose.
- Spotted by the lint-locale-usage tooling by @fogti.
(cherry picked from commit bd9366e7fc)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7430
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7395
- Add `binding:"In(...)"` to the `default_merge_style` and `default_update_style` fields to only accept recognized merge and update styles.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#7389
- Added integration test for the API (`binding` works in the exact same way for the API and web routes).
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7401
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7355
- Always initialize `RequestedReviewers` and `RequestedReviewersTeams`, this avoids the JSON encoder from encoding it to the zero value `null` and instead return a empty array.
- Resolves#4108
- Integration test added.
Co-authored-by: ThomasBoom89 <thomasboom89@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7365
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7344
- This makes the `repo-settings` e2e testing happy.
- There's no point into checking `vertical-align`; it has no effect when `position: absolute` is set, which is is currently set unconditionally for checkboxes and radios on forms.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7345
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
2025-03-26 13:47:17 +00:00
2317 changed files with 26105 additions and 16162 deletions
# See also https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/release/#stable-release-process
#
# TOKEN_NEXT_DIGEST is a token with write repository access to https://invisible.forgejo.org/infrastructure/next-digest issued by https://invisible.forgejo.org/forgejo-next-digest
;NAMES = English,简体中文,繁體中文（香港）,繁體中文（台灣）,Danish,Deutsch,Plattdüütsch,Français,Nederlands,Latviešu,Русский,Українська,日本語,Español,Português do Brasil,Português de Portugal,Polski,Български,Italiano,Suomi,Filipino,Esperanto,Türkçe,Čeština,Slovenščina,Svenska,한국어,Ελληνικά,فارسی,Magyar nyelv,Bahasa Indonesia
;NAMES = English,简体中文,繁體中文（香港）,繁體中文（台灣）,Dansk,Deutsch,Plattdüütsch,Français,Nederlands,Latviešu,Русский,Українська,日本語,Español,Português do Brasil,Português de Portugal,Polski,Български,Italiano,Suomi,Filipino,Esperanto,Türkçe,Čeština,Slovenščina,Svenska,한국어,Ελληνικά,فارسی,Magyar nyelv,Bahasa Indonesia
