mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2026-05-12 22:10:25 +00:00
1ddd5faa5c
Currently authentication methods return information in two forms: they return who was authenticated as a `*user_model.User`, and then they insert key-values into `ctx.Data` which has critical impact on how the authenticated request is treated. This PR changes the authentication methods to return structured data in the form of an `AuthenticationResult`, with all the key-value information in `ctx.Data` being moved into methods on the `AuthenticationResult` interface. Authentication workflows in Forgejo are a real mess. This is the first step in trying to clean it up and make the code predictable and reasonable, and is both follow-up work that was identified from the repo-specific access tokens (where the `"ApiTokenReducer"` key-value was added), and is pre-requisite work to future JWT enhancements that are [being discussed](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/3571#issuecomment-13268004). ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. All work and communication must conform to Forgejo's [AI Agreement](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/AIAgreement.md). There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests for Go changes - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - All changes, at least in theory, are refactors of existing logic and are not expected to have functional deviations -- existing regression tests are the only planned testing. - I ran... - [x] `make pr-go` before pushing ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change. - [x] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12202 Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org>
33 lines
869 B
Go
33 lines
869 B
Go
// Copyright 2026 The Forgejo Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
|
|
|
|
package method
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
auth_model "forgejo.org/models/auth"
|
|
user_model "forgejo.org/models/user"
|
|
"forgejo.org/modules/optional"
|
|
"forgejo.org/services/auth"
|
|
"forgejo.org/services/authz"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
var _ auth.AuthenticationResult = &accessTokenAuthenticationResult{}
|
|
|
|
type accessTokenAuthenticationResult struct {
|
|
*auth.BaseAuthenticationResult
|
|
user *user_model.User
|
|
scope auth_model.AccessTokenScope
|
|
reducer authz.AuthorizationReducer
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (r *accessTokenAuthenticationResult) User() *user_model.User {
|
|
return r.user
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (r *accessTokenAuthenticationResult) Scope() optional.Option[auth_model.AccessTokenScope] {
|
|
return optional.Some(r.scope)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (r *accessTokenAuthenticationResult) Reducer() authz.AuthorizationReducer {
|
|
return r.reducer
|
|
}
|