jojo/services/context/permission.go
Mathieu Fenniak 1ddd5faa5c refactor: change authentication to return structured data (#12202)
Currently authentication methods return information in two forms: they return who was authenticated as a `*user_model.User`, and then they insert key-values into `ctx.Data` which has critical impact on how the authenticated request is treated.  This PR changes the authentication methods to return structured data in the form of an `AuthenticationResult`, with all the key-value information in `ctx.Data` being moved into methods on the `AuthenticationResult` interface.

Authentication workflows in Forgejo are a real mess.  This is the first step in trying to clean it up and make the code predictable and reasonable, and is both follow-up work that was identified from the repo-specific access tokens (where the `"ApiTokenReducer"` key-value was added), and is pre-requisite work to future JWT enhancements that are [being discussed](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/3571#issuecomment-13268004).

## Checklist

The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. All work and communication must conform to Forgejo's [AI Agreement](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/AIAgreement.md). There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).

### Tests for Go changes

- I added test coverage for Go changes...
  - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
  - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
  - All changes, at least in theory, are refactors of existing logic and are not expected to have functional deviations -- existing regression tests are the only planned testing.
- I ran...
  - [x] `make pr-go` before pushing

### Documentation

- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.

### Release notes

- [ ] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change.
- [x] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change.

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12202
Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org>
2026-04-22 21:00:26 +02:00

196 lines
5.3 KiB
Go

// Copyright 2018 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package context
import (
"net/http"
"slices"
auth_model "forgejo.org/models/auth"
"forgejo.org/models/perm"
repo_model "forgejo.org/models/repo"
"forgejo.org/models/unit"
"forgejo.org/modules/log"
)
// RequireRepoAdmin returns a middleware for requiring repository admin permission
func RequireRepoAdmin() func(ctx *Context) {
return func(ctx *Context) {
if !ctx.IsSigned || !ctx.Repo.IsAdmin() {
ctx.NotFound(ctx.Req.URL.RequestURI(), nil)
return
}
}
}
// RequireRepoWriter returns a middleware for requiring repository write to the specify unitType
func RequireRepoWriter(unitType unit.Type) func(ctx *Context) {
return func(ctx *Context) {
if !ctx.Repo.CanWrite(unitType) {
ctx.NotFound(ctx.Req.URL.RequestURI(), nil)
return
}
}
}
// CanEnableEditor checks if the user is allowed to write to the branch of the repo
func CanEnableEditor() func(ctx *Context) {
return func(ctx *Context) {
if !ctx.Repo.CanWriteToBranch(ctx, ctx.Doer, ctx.Repo.BranchName) {
ctx.NotFound("CanWriteToBranch denies permission", nil)
return
}
}
}
// RequireRepoWriterOr returns a middleware for requiring repository write to one of the unit permission
func RequireRepoWriterOr(unitTypes ...unit.Type) func(ctx *Context) {
return func(ctx *Context) {
if slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.CanWrite) {
return
}
ctx.NotFound(ctx.Req.URL.RequestURI(), nil)
}
}
// RequireRepoReader returns a middleware for requiring repository read to the specify unitType
func RequireRepoReader(unitType unit.Type) func(ctx *Context) {
return func(ctx *Context) {
if !ctx.Repo.CanRead(unitType) {
if log.IsTrace() {
if ctx.IsSigned {
log.Trace("Permission Denied: User %-v cannot read %-v in Repo %-v\n"+
"User in Repo has Permissions: %-+v",
ctx.Doer,
unitType,
ctx.Repo.Repository,
ctx.Repo.Permission)
} else {
log.Trace("Permission Denied: Anonymous user cannot read %-v in Repo %-v\n"+
"Anonymous user in Repo has Permissions: %-+v",
unitType,
ctx.Repo.Repository,
ctx.Repo.Permission)
}
}
ctx.NotFound(ctx.Req.URL.RequestURI(), nil)
return
}
}
}
// RequireRepoReaderOr returns a middleware for requiring repository write to one of the unit permission
func RequireRepoReaderOr(unitTypes ...unit.Type) func(ctx *Context) {
return func(ctx *Context) {
if slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.CanRead) {
return
}
if log.IsTrace() {
var format string
var args []any
if ctx.IsSigned {
format = "Permission Denied: User %-v cannot read ["
args = append(args, ctx.Doer)
} else {
format = "Permission Denied: Anonymous user cannot read ["
}
for _, unit := range unitTypes {
format += "%-v, "
args = append(args, unit)
}
format = format[:len(format)-2] + "] in Repo %-v\n" +
"User in Repo has Permissions: %-+v"
args = append(args, ctx.Repo.Repository, ctx.Repo.Permission)
log.Trace(format, args...)
}
ctx.NotFound(ctx.Req.URL.RequestURI(), nil)
}
}
func RequireRepoDelegateActionTrust() func(ctx *Context) {
return func(ctx *Context) {
if CheckRepoDelegateActionTrust(ctx) {
return
}
ctx.NotFound(ctx.Req.URL.RequestURI(), nil)
}
}
func CheckRepoDelegateActionTrust(ctx *Context) bool {
return ctx.Repo.IsAdmin() || (ctx.IsSigned && ctx.Doer.IsAdmin) || ctx.Repo.CanWrite(unit.TypeActions)
}
// CheckRepoScopedToken check whether personal access token has repo scope
func CheckRepoScopedToken(ctx *Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, level auth_model.AccessTokenScopeLevel) {
if hasScope, scope := ctx.Authentication.Scope().Get(); hasScope {
var scopeMatched bool
requiredScopes := auth_model.GetRequiredScopes(level, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryRepository)
// check if scope only applies to public resources
publicOnly, err := scope.PublicOnly()
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("HasScope", err)
return
}
if publicOnly && repo.IsPrivate {
ctx.Error(http.StatusForbidden)
return
}
scopeMatched, err = scope.HasScope(requiredScopes...)
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("HasScope", err)
return
}
if !scopeMatched {
ctx.Error(http.StatusForbidden)
return
}
}
if reducer := ctx.Authentication.Reducer(); reducer != nil {
var accessMode perm.AccessMode
switch level {
case auth_model.Read:
accessMode = perm.AccessModeRead
case auth_model.Write:
accessMode = perm.AccessModeWrite
case auth_model.NoAccess:
fallthrough
default:
accessMode = perm.AccessModeNone
}
actualAccessMode, err := reducer.ReduceRepoAccess(ctx, repo, accessMode)
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("HasScope", err)
return
} else if actualAccessMode != accessMode {
ctx.Error(http.StatusForbidden)
return
}
}
}
func CheckRuntimeDeterminedScope(ctx *APIContext, scopeCategory auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategory, level auth_model.AccessTokenScopeLevel, msg string) {
if hasScope, scope := ctx.Authentication.Scope().Get(); hasScope {
var scopeMatched bool
requiredScopes := auth_model.GetRequiredScopes(level, scopeCategory)
scopeMatched, err := scope.HasScope(requiredScopes...)
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("HasScope", err)
return
}
if !scopeMatched {
ctx.Error(http.StatusForbidden, "!scopeMatched", msg)
return
}
}
}