mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2026-05-12 22:10:25 +00:00
a012b8bf36
Currently: - In the database, `NULL` is used in `action_runner_token.owner_id` & `.repo_id` to represent an absent value, as required by the foreign key - In the code, `0` is used in `ActionRunnerToken.OwnerID` and `.RepoID` to represent an absent value This PR replaces the `int64` fields with `optional.Option[int64]` which allows a single data type to be used for both cases, and removes the usage of the value `0` as a placeholder. This change has a limited scope -- although `ActionRunnerToken` uses `NULL` values in the database, the related table `ActionRunner` still uses zero-values for `OwnerID` and `RepoID`. This means a lot of code interacting with both of these tables still uses `0` values, such as the UI. The changes here were stopped at a reasonable point to avoid cascading into all places that use the `ActionRunner` table. (I'll continue this work in the future to enable foreign keys on `ActionRunner`, but likely after #11516 is completed to avoid serious conflict resolution problems.) ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests for Go changes (can be removed for JavaScript changes) - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I ran... - [x] `make pr-go` before pushing ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change. - [x] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11601 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| actions | ||
| activities | ||
| admin | ||
| asymkey | ||
| auth | ||
| avatars | ||
| db | ||
| dbfs | ||
| fixtures | ||
| forgefed | ||
| forgejo/semver | ||
| forgejo_migrations | ||
| forgejo_migrations_legacy | ||
| git | ||
| gitea_migrations | ||
| issues | ||
| moderation | ||
| organization | ||
| packages | ||
| perm | ||
| project | ||
| pull | ||
| quota | ||
| repo | ||
| secret | ||
| shared/types | ||
| system | ||
| unit | ||
| unittest | ||
| user | ||
| webhook | ||
| error.go | ||
| main_test.go | ||
| org.go | ||
| org_team.go | ||
| org_team_test.go | ||
| org_test.go | ||
| repo.go | ||
| repo_test.go | ||
| repo_transfer.go | ||
| repo_transfer_test.go | ||