mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2026-05-13 06:20:24 +00:00
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11988 Optimize loading pull request review comments, which currently perform separate database queries for each comment in order to load the resolver of the comment, and the reactions on that comment, and the users on each reaction of the comments. I stumbled across this ugly code, which enticed me to look into this:80d840c128/routers/web/repo/pull.go (L1107-L1120)It appeared to load the attachments from each comment on the pull request review page in separate database queries. It turned out to be a noop, as the attachments are already loaded in bulk:80d840c128/models/issues/comment_code.go (L120-L122)but the `findCodeComments` method loads the "resolver doer" and the reactions one-by-one for each comment. So I fixed that instead, and removed the ineffective deeply nested for loop. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. All work and communication must conform to Forgejo's [AI Agreement](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/AIAgreement.md). There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests for Go changes - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I ran... - [x] `make pr-go` before pushing ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change. - [x] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change. Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11995 Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
183 lines
5.5 KiB
Go
183 lines
5.5 KiB
Go
// Copyright 2022 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
|
|
|
|
package issues
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
|
|
"forgejo.org/models/db"
|
|
user_model "forgejo.org/models/user"
|
|
"forgejo.org/modules/markup"
|
|
"forgejo.org/modules/markup/markdown"
|
|
|
|
"xorm.io/builder"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// CodeConversation contains the comment of a given review
|
|
type CodeConversation []*Comment
|
|
|
|
// CodeConversationsAtLine contains the conversations for a given line
|
|
type CodeConversationsAtLine map[int64][]CodeConversation
|
|
|
|
// CodeConversationsAtLineAndTreePath contains the conversations for a given TreePath and line
|
|
type CodeConversationsAtLineAndTreePath map[string]CodeConversationsAtLine
|
|
|
|
func newCodeConversationsAtLineAndTreePath(comments []*Comment) CodeConversationsAtLineAndTreePath {
|
|
tree := make(CodeConversationsAtLineAndTreePath)
|
|
for _, comment := range comments {
|
|
tree.insertComment(comment)
|
|
}
|
|
return tree
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (tree CodeConversationsAtLineAndTreePath) insertComment(comment *Comment) {
|
|
// attempt to append comment to existing conversations (i.e. list of comments belonging to the same review)
|
|
for i, conversation := range tree[comment.TreePath][comment.Line] {
|
|
if conversation[0].ReviewID == comment.ReviewID {
|
|
tree[comment.TreePath][comment.Line][i] = append(conversation, comment)
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// no previous conversation was found at this line, create it
|
|
if tree[comment.TreePath] == nil {
|
|
tree[comment.TreePath] = make(map[int64][]CodeConversation)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tree[comment.TreePath][comment.Line] = append(tree[comment.TreePath][comment.Line], CodeConversation{comment})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// FetchCodeConversations will return a 2d-map: ["Path"]["Line"] = List of CodeConversation (one per review) for this line
|
|
func FetchCodeConversations(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, doer *user_model.User, showOutdatedComments bool) (CodeConversationsAtLineAndTreePath, error) {
|
|
opts := FindCommentsOptions{
|
|
Type: CommentTypeCode,
|
|
IssueID: issue.ID,
|
|
}
|
|
comments, err := findCodeComments(ctx, opts, issue, doer, nil, showOutdatedComments)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return newCodeConversationsAtLineAndTreePath(comments), nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CodeComments represents comments on code by using this structure: FILENAME -> LINE (+ == proposed; - == previous) -> COMMENTS
|
|
type CodeComments map[string]map[int64][]*Comment
|
|
|
|
func fetchCodeCommentsByReview(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, doer *user_model.User, review *Review, showOutdatedComments bool) (CodeComments, error) {
|
|
pathToLineToComment := make(CodeComments)
|
|
if review == nil {
|
|
review = &Review{ID: 0}
|
|
}
|
|
opts := FindCommentsOptions{
|
|
Type: CommentTypeCode,
|
|
IssueID: issue.ID,
|
|
ReviewID: review.ID,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
comments, err := findCodeComments(ctx, opts, issue, doer, review, showOutdatedComments)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, comment := range comments {
|
|
if pathToLineToComment[comment.TreePath] == nil {
|
|
pathToLineToComment[comment.TreePath] = make(map[int64][]*Comment)
|
|
}
|
|
pathToLineToComment[comment.TreePath][comment.Line] = append(pathToLineToComment[comment.TreePath][comment.Line], comment)
|
|
}
|
|
return pathToLineToComment, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func findCodeComments(ctx context.Context, opts FindCommentsOptions, issue *Issue, doer *user_model.User, review *Review, showOutdatedComments bool) (CommentList, error) {
|
|
var comments CommentList
|
|
if review == nil {
|
|
review = &Review{ID: 0}
|
|
}
|
|
conds := opts.ToConds()
|
|
|
|
if !showOutdatedComments && review.ID == 0 {
|
|
conds = conds.And(builder.Eq{"invalidated": false})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
e := db.GetEngine(ctx)
|
|
if err := e.Where(conds).
|
|
Asc("comment.created_unix").
|
|
Asc("comment.id").
|
|
Find(&comments); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if err := issue.LoadRepo(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if err := comments.LoadPosters(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if err := comments.LoadAttachments(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Find all reviews by ReviewID
|
|
reviews := make(map[int64]*Review)
|
|
ids := make([]int64, 0, len(comments))
|
|
for _, comment := range comments {
|
|
if comment.ReviewID != 0 {
|
|
ids = append(ids, comment.ReviewID)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if err := e.In("id", ids).Find(&reviews); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
readyComments := make(CommentList, 0, len(comments))
|
|
for _, comment := range comments {
|
|
if re, ok := reviews[comment.ReviewID]; ok && re != nil {
|
|
// If the review is pending only the author can see the comments (except if the review is set)
|
|
if review.ID == 0 && re.Type == ReviewTypePending &&
|
|
(doer == nil || doer.ID != re.ReviewerID) {
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
comment.Review = re
|
|
}
|
|
readyComments = append(readyComments, comment)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if err := readyComments.LoadResolveDoers(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if err := readyComments.LoadReactions(ctx, issue.Repo); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, comment := range readyComments {
|
|
var err error
|
|
if comment.RenderedContent, err = markdown.RenderString(&markup.RenderContext{
|
|
Ctx: ctx,
|
|
Links: markup.Links{
|
|
Base: issue.Repo.Link(),
|
|
},
|
|
Metas: issue.Repo.ComposeMetas(ctx),
|
|
}, comment.Content); err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return readyComments, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// FetchCodeConversation fetches the code conversation of a given comment (same review, treePath and line number)
|
|
func FetchCodeConversation(ctx context.Context, comment *Comment, doer *user_model.User) (CommentList, error) {
|
|
opts := FindCommentsOptions{
|
|
Type: CommentTypeCode,
|
|
IssueID: comment.IssueID,
|
|
ReviewID: comment.ReviewID,
|
|
TreePath: comment.TreePath,
|
|
Line: comment.Line,
|
|
}
|
|
return findCodeComments(ctx, opts, comment.Issue, doer, nil, true)
|
|
}
|