mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2026-05-12 22:10:25 +00:00
9f8dda6325
When concurrent updates occur to the `action_run` table, fetching a task via `FetchTask` can result in an error: ``` time="2026-01-16T16:02:30Z" level=error msg="failed to fetch task" error="internal: pick task: CreateTaskForRunner: update run 2358339: run has changed" ``` This is an error with no known harm. However, it is more efficient to recover from doing 90% of the work to fetch a task, and complete that work, rather than error out and rollback. Discovered while investigating https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/issues/1302#issuecomment-73859, although conclusions do not indicate that it is a source of this bug. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change. - [ ] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change. *The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.* The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10893 Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| artifact.go | ||
| forgejo.go | ||
| forgejo_test.go | ||
| main_test.go | ||
| pre_execution_errors.go | ||
| pre_execution_errors_test.go | ||
| run.go | ||
| run_job.go | ||
| run_job_list.go | ||
| run_job_status_test.go | ||
| run_job_test.go | ||
| run_list.go | ||
| run_test.go | ||
| runner.go | ||
| runner_list.go | ||
| runner_test.go | ||
| runner_token.go | ||
| runner_token_test.go | ||
| schedule.go | ||
| schedule_spec.go | ||
| schedule_spec_list.go | ||
| schedule_spec_test.go | ||
| status.go | ||
| task.go | ||
| task_list.go | ||
| task_output.go | ||
| task_step.go | ||
| task_test.go | ||
| tasks_version.go | ||
| user.go | ||
| user_test.go | ||
| utils.go | ||
| utils_test.go | ||
| variable.go | ||