mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2026-05-12 22:10:25 +00:00
a012b8bf36
Currently: - In the database, `NULL` is used in `action_runner_token.owner_id` & `.repo_id` to represent an absent value, as required by the foreign key - In the code, `0` is used in `ActionRunnerToken.OwnerID` and `.RepoID` to represent an absent value This PR replaces the `int64` fields with `optional.Option[int64]` which allows a single data type to be used for both cases, and removes the usage of the value `0` as a placeholder. This change has a limited scope -- although `ActionRunnerToken` uses `NULL` values in the database, the related table `ActionRunner` still uses zero-values for `OwnerID` and `RepoID`. This means a lot of code interacting with both of these tables still uses `0` values, such as the UI. The changes here were stopped at a reasonable point to avoid cascading into all places that use the `ActionRunner` table. (I'll continue this work in the future to enable foreign keys on `ActionRunner`, but likely after #11516 is completed to avoid serious conflict resolution problems.) ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests for Go changes (can be removed for JavaScript changes) - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I ran... - [x] `make pr-go` before pushing ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change. - [x] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11601 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| archiver | ||
| commitstatus | ||
| files | ||
| gitgraph | ||
| adopt.go | ||
| adopt_test.go | ||
| avatar.go | ||
| avatar_test.go | ||
| branch.go | ||
| cache.go | ||
| check.go | ||
| collaboration.go | ||
| collaboration_test.go | ||
| commit.go | ||
| contributors_graph.go | ||
| contributors_graph_test.go | ||
| create.go | ||
| create_test.go | ||
| delete.go | ||
| fork.go | ||
| fork_test.go | ||
| generate.go | ||
| generate_repo_commit.go | ||
| generate_repo_commit_legacy.go | ||
| generate_test.go | ||
| hooks.go | ||
| init.go | ||
| lfs.go | ||
| lfs_test.go | ||
| main_test.go | ||
| migrate.go | ||
| push.go | ||
| repository.go | ||
| repository_test.go | ||
| review.go | ||
| review_test.go | ||
| setting.go | ||
| star.go | ||
| sync_fork.go | ||
| template.go | ||
| transfer.go | ||
| transfer_test.go | ||