mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2026-05-13 06:20:24 +00:00
186664b881
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10945 #10893 introduced a retry loop to manage concurrent updates when updating the state of `action_run` in the function `UpdateRunJobWithoutNotification`. However, when `UpdateRunJobWithoutNotification` is called from within a transaction, the retry loop continues to read the same data from the DB (due to repeatable read isolation) and loops infinitely. As #10893 was later identified to not be required to fix the target problem (https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/issues/1302), this PR reverts the change. The only retained change is that the error `ErrActionRunOutOfDate` is a constant rather than `errors.New("run has changed")`. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [x] Reverted the test added for 10893 after confirming that it is the cause of the problem. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change. - [ ] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change. *The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.* The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead. Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10947 Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| artifact.go | ||
| forgejo.go | ||
| forgejo_test.go | ||
| main_test.go | ||
| pre_execution_errors.go | ||
| pre_execution_errors_test.go | ||
| run.go | ||
| run_job.go | ||
| run_job_list.go | ||
| run_job_status_test.go | ||
| run_job_test.go | ||
| run_list.go | ||
| run_test.go | ||
| runner.go | ||
| runner_list.go | ||
| runner_test.go | ||
| runner_token.go | ||
| runner_token_test.go | ||
| schedule.go | ||
| schedule_spec.go | ||
| schedule_spec_list.go | ||
| schedule_spec_test.go | ||
| status.go | ||
| task.go | ||
| task_list.go | ||
| task_output.go | ||
| task_step.go | ||
| task_test.go | ||
| tasks_version.go | ||
| user.go | ||
| user_test.go | ||
| utils.go | ||
| utils_test.go | ||
| variable.go | ||