**Backport:** #10686
(cherry picked from commit 270317a3ad)
```
NAME:
forgejo doctor cleanup-commit-status - Cleanup extra records in commit_status table
USAGE:
forgejo doctor cleanup-commit-status
DESCRIPTION:
Forgejo suffered from a bug which caused the creation of more entries in the
"commit_status" table than necessary. This operation removes the redundant
data caused by the bug. Removing this data is almost always safe.
These reundant records can be accessed by users through the API, making it
possible, but unlikely, that removing it could have an impact to
integrating services (API: /repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits/{ref}/statuses).
It is safe to run while Forgejo is online.
On very large Forgejo instances, the performance of operation will improve
if the buffer-size option is used with large values. Approximately 130 MB of
memory is required for every 100,000 records in the buffer.
Bug reference: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/10671
OPTIONS:
--help, -h show help
--custom-path string, -C string Set custom path (defaults to '{WorkPath}/custom')
--config string, -c string Set custom config file (defaults to '{WorkPath}/custom/conf/app.ini')
--work-path string, -w string Set Forgejo's working path (defaults to the directory of the Forgejo binary)
--verbose, -V Show process details
--dry-run Report statistics from the operation but do not modify the database
--buffer-size int Record count per query while iterating records; larger values are typically faster but use more memory (default: 100000)
--delete-chunk-size int Number of records to delete per DELETE query (default: 1000)
```
The cleanup effectively performs `SELECT * FROM commit_status ORDER BY repo_id, sha, context, index, id`, and iterates through the records. Whenever `index, id` changes without the other fields changing, then it's a useless record that can be deleted. The major complication is doing that at scale without bringing the entire database table into memory, which is performed through a new iteration method `IterateByKeyset`.
Manually tested against a 455,303 record table in PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite, which was reduced to 10,781 records, dropping 97.5% of the records.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10783
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10747
We need to take all matching required status into account to get the desired status because there can be some pending.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10787): <!--number 10787 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Zml4OiBjb3JyZWN0bHkgY29tcHV0ZSByZXF1aXJlZCBjb21taXQgc3RhdHVz-->fix: correctly compute required commit status<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10787
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
This was implicitly loaded during the mail notifications notifier. If
you disable mail notifications on Forgejo then this will result in the
reviewer not being loaded and NPE.
`GPGKeyToEntity` incorrectly assumed that within a keyring with multiple
keys that the first key is verified and should be exported. Look at all
keys and find the one that matches the verified key ID.
**Backport:** #10678
(cherry picked from commit 8f63ee9a94)
Fixes#10671.
Cleanup for the inflated number of records in this table will come in a near future change.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10681
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10632
`build-release.yml` attempts to run an end-to-end check with a cascading PR, but it doesn't target the currently building branch. When two releases build simultaneously (eg. `forgejo/v14.0` and `forgejo`), whichever one starts the end-to-end test first is then "cancelled" by the second one as it pushes an update to the same branch.
This will be a bit of an experimental change due to the difficulty in setting up a test environment. After merge, I intend to watch a v14 and forgejo build and verify that they are independent, and, that both are actually tested with the correct target build.
This introduces a need to backport any changes to `.forgejo/cascading-release-end-to-end` in the future to maintain cascading functionality in all active releases.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10634
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [go](https://go.dev/) ([source](https://github.com/golang/go)) | toolchain | patch | `1.25.3` -> `1.25.5` |
---
> ⚠️ **Warning**
>
> Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
---
This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0Mi4yNy41IiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiNDIuMjcuNSIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6InYxMS4wL2Zvcmdlam8iLCJsYWJlbHMiOlsiZGVwZW5kZW5jeS11cGdyYWRlIiwidGVzdC9ub3QtbmVlZGVkIl19-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10304
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
[CVSS 5.3 Medium](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- The `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` APIs allow a user to link an issue in one repository as "depending upon" an issue in another repository. Forgejo's implementation had an incorrect permission check which would verify only that the user had write permissions on the issue being modified, and not on the issue it was linking to. Due to the incorrect permission check, it was possible to view limited information (the existence of, and title of) an issue in a private repository that the user does not have access to view. The permission check has been corrected to take into account visibility of the remote repository.
[CVSS 5.3 Medium](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- Fetching information about a release via the `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/releases/tag/{tag}` API endpoint did not check whether the release was a draft, allowing accessing to information about a draft release to users who could predict an upcoming release tag but didn't have access to view it. The missing check has been added, returning a 404 response when the release is not published.
[CVSS 6.3 Medium](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- Forgejo's web interface allows deleting tags on a git repository through a form post. The endpoint for this form post had misconfigured middleware handlers which enforce security rights, allowing an anonymous user, or a logged-in user without the correct permissions, to delete tags on repositories that they did not own by injecting arbitrary internal tag identifiers into the form. The middleware handler configuration has been corrected.
[CVSS 2.1 Low](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- When the head branch of a pull request matches a branch protection rule, the head branch should be able to be merged or rebased only according to the "Push" rules defined in the protection rule. An implementation error checked those branch protection rules in the context of the base repository rather than the head repository, allowing users with write access to the base repository to be considered able to push to the branch, bypassing the "Enable push" option's expected security control.
[CVSS 2.1 Low](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- An issue owner can manipulate form inputs to delete the content history of comments they did not create, as long as those comments are on issues that they own. Although comment content is not affected, the history of edits on the comment can be trimmed. The validation in the form handler was corrected.
[CVSS 5.1 Medium](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4-0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) -- When a repository is configured with tag protection rules, it should not be possible for a user that is outside the whitelisted users or teams from modifying the protected tags. An incorrect parameter being passed to a security verification method allowed a user with write access to the repo to delete tags even if they were protected, as long as the tag was originally created by a user who is still authorized by the protection rules.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Security bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Zml4KGFwaSk6IGZpeCBkZXBlbmRlbmN5IHJlcG8gcGVybXMgaW4gQ3JlYXRlL1JlbW92ZUlzc3VlRGVwZW5kZW5jeQ==-->fix(api): fix dependency repo perms in Create/RemoveIssueDependency<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 1 --><!--description Zml4KGFwaSk6IGRyYWZ0IHJlbGVhc2VzIGNvdWxkIGJlIHJlYWQgYmVmb3JlIGJlaW5nIHB1Ymxpc2hlZA==-->fix(api): draft releases could be read before being published<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 2 --><!--description bWlzY29uZmlndXJlZCBzZWN1cml0eSBjaGVja3Mgb24gdGFnIGRlbGV0ZSB3ZWIgZm9ybQ==-->misconfigured security checks on tag delete web form<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 3 --><!--description aW5jb3JyZWN0IGxvZ2ljIGluICJVcGRhdGUgUFIiIGRpZCBub3QgZW5mb3JjZSBoZWFkIGJyYW5jaCBwcm90ZWN0aW9uIHJ1bGVzIGNvcnJlY3RseQ==-->incorrect logic in "Update PR" did not enforce head branch protection rules correctly<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 4 --><!--description aXNzdWUgb3duZXIgY2FuIGRlbGV0ZSBhbm90aGVyIHVzZXIncyBjb21tZW50J3MgZWRpdCBoaXN0b3J5IG9uIHNhbWUgaXNzdWU=-->issue owner can delete another user's comment's edit history on same issue<!--description-->
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039): <!--number 10039 --><!--line 5 --><!--description dGFnIHByb3RlY3Rpb24gcnVsZXMgY2FuIGJlIGJ5cGFzc2VkIGR1cmluZyB0YWcgZGVsZXRlIG9wZXJhdGlvbg==-->tag protection rules can be bypassed during tag delete operation<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Joshua Rogers <MegaManSec@users.noreply.github.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10039
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/10176 was unintentionally merged in a state where CI fails.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10186
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
**Backport:** #7025Resolves#6266
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7025
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Dmitrii Sharshakov <d3dx12.xx@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: Dmitrii Sharshakov <d3dx12.xx@gmail.com>
Backported due to `make security-check` failing in `v11.0/forgejo` branch due to a new registered vulnerability in the github.com/nwaples/rardecode.
```
/home/forgejo/go/pkg/mod/golang.org/toolchain@v0.0.1-go1.25.3.linux-amd64/bin/go run golang.org/x/vuln/cmd/govulncheck@v1 ./...
=== Symbol Results ===
Vulnerability #1: GO-2025-4020
DoS risk due to unrestricted RAR dictionary sizes in
github.com/nwaples/rardecode
More info: https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-4020
Module: github.com/nwaples/rardecode
Found in: github.com/nwaples/rardecode@v1.1.3
Fixed in: N/A
Example traces found:
#1: modules/git/repo_commit.go:263:24: git.Repository.CommitsByFileAndRange calls io.ReadFull, which eventually calls rardecode.cipherBlockReader.Read
#2: modules/packages/arch/metadata.go:22:2: arch.init calls archiver.init, which calls rardecode.init
#3: modules/git/repo_language_stats.go:198:32: git.Repository.GetLanguageStats calls bytes.Buffer.ReadFrom, which calls rardecode.limitedReader.Read
Your code is affected by 1 vulnerability from 1 module.
This scan also found 1 vulnerability in packages you import and 0
vulnerabilities in modules you require, but your code doesn't appear to call
these vulnerabilities.
Use '-show verbose' for more details.
exit status 3
make: *** [Makefile:526: security-check] Error 1
```
Co-authored-by: Dmitrii Sharshakov <d3dx12.xx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10043
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Manual backport #9822 to v11.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9828
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [data.forgejo.org/oci/alpine](https://hub.docker.com/_/alpine) ([source](https://github.com/alpinelinux/docker-alpine)) | final | minor | `3.21` -> `3.22` |
---
> ⚠️ **Warning**
>
> Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
---
This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0MS4xNTIuOSIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjQxLjE1Mi45IiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoidjExLjAvZm9yZ2VqbyIsImxhYmVscyI6WyJkZXBlbmRlbmN5LXVwZ3JhZGUiLCJ0ZXN0L25vdC1uZWVkZWQiXX0=-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9826
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [go](https://go.dev/) ([source](https://github.com/golang/go)) | toolchain | minor | `1.24.6` -> `1.25.3` |
| [go](https://go.dev/) ([source](https://github.com/golang/go)) | golang | minor | `1.24` -> `1.25` |
---
> ⚠️ **Warning**
>
> Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
---
This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0MS4xNTIuOSIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjQxLjE1Mi45IiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoidjExLjAvZm9yZ2VqbyIsImxhYmVscyI6WyJkZXBlbmRlbmN5LXVwZ3JhZGUiLCJ0ZXN0L25vdC1uZWVkZWQiXX0=-->
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9821
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
**Backport:** #9773
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9775): <!--number 9775 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Zml4OiBzdHJpY3QgZXJyb3IgaGFuZGxpbmcgb24gY29ycnVwdGVkIERCIG1pZ3JhdGlvbiB0cmFja2luZyB0YWJsZXM=-->fix: strict error handling on corrupted DB migration tracking tables<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9775
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
**Backport:** #9662
Test failure:
```
1) [chromium] › tests/e2e/webauthn.test.e2e.ts:14:1 › WebAuthn register & login flow ─────────────
Error: page.goto: Navigation to "http://localhost:3003/user/login" is interrupted by another navigation to "http://localhost:3003/"
Call log:
- navigating to "http://localhost:3003/user/login", waiting until "load"
46 |
47 | // Login.
> 48 | response = await page.goto('/user/login');
| ^
49 | expect(response?.status()).toBe(200);
50 |
51 | await page.getByLabel('Username or email address').fill(username);
at /workspace/forgejo/forgejo/tests/e2e/webauthn.test.e2e.ts:48:25
```
I have not been able to reproduce this locally.
What seems to be happening is that the current code is clicking the "Sign out" menu option, and then while the browser is busy (navigating to `/logout`, redirecting to `/`), the test attempts to navigate directly to `/user/login`. The two navigations are racey, depending on how fast they work they may result in this error. The proposed fix is to wait for the sign-out operation to complete by waiting for the URL to land on `/`, before then proceeding with the rest of the test with the second login.
Normally this would be *just* a `waitForURL` call. But because of the redirect on logout, I've encountered the below error if the code is just invoking `waitForURL`. So I put the `waitForURL` invocation into an `expect(...).toPass()`. This isn't technically the correct usage of `toPass` which is intended for *assertions* which will eventually become successful, whereas this is attempting to retry a wait... but... a wait shouldn't need a retry. (I'd argue this is a Playwright bug.)
```
Error: page.waitForURL: net::ERR_ABORTED; maybe frame was detached?
```
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9662
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9673
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9504
With forgejo/forgejo#9075 the `GetUserByEmail` now actually only used activated emails. This however broke sending recovery mails to unactivated users, as their email are not yet activated.
Use the newly introduced function `GetUserByEmailSimple` to not care about this activated email requirement and also avoid the no-reply address being a valid email address for this functionality.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9516
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9468
If the keep count of a cleanup rule is greater than the number of available packages, it fails with:
```
panic(boundsError{x: int64(x), signed: true, y: y, code: boundsSliceB})
.../packages/packages.go:175
.../routers/web/org/setting_packages.go:108
```
Regression of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9219/files
Refs https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/9461
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9468): <!--number 9468 --><!--line 0 --><!--description cGFja2FnZSBjbGVhbmVkIHJ1bGUgZmFpbHMgaWYgdGhlIGtlZXAgY291bnQgaXMgdG9vIGhpZ2g=-->package cleaned rule fails if the keep count is too high<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9469
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9362
Do not display the title of unsubscribed issues or pull requests in the notification web page . The title of some random issues or pull requests from repositories were accidentally displayed in the notifications of a user. It was a rare occurrence, caused by an incorrect comparison of two unrelated unique identifiers that are unlikely to match (the id of the notification and the id of a repository). If the issue or the pull request belonged to a private repository to which the user had no read access, only the title was leaked. The user was denied permission to view the issue or the pull request when clicking on the link displayed in the notifications web page.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [x] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Security bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9362): <!--number 9362 --><!--line 0 --><!--description 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-->Do not display the title of unsubscribed issues or pull requests in the notification web page . The title of some random issues or pull requests from repositories were accidentally displayed in the notifications of a user. It was a rare occurrence, caused by an incorrect comparison of two unrelated unique identifiers that are unlikely to match (the id of the notification and the id of a repository). If the issue or the pull request belonged to a private repository to which the user had no read access, only the title was leaked. The user was denied permission to view the issue or the pull request when clicking on the link displayed in the notifications web page.<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9363
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
backport of #9219
---
Before it has only processed the newest 200 (or 50 for default `MAX_RESPONSE_ITEMS: 50`) versions.
After it processes all versions.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9219
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de>
Co-committed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de>
(cherry picked from commit c697de9517)
Conflicts:
tests/integration/api_packages_test.go
Trivial import conflict and missing helper addition
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9232): <!--number 9232 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Zml4OiBwYWNrYWdlIGNsZWFudXAgcnVsZXMgYXJlIG5vdCBhcHBsaWVkIHdoZW4gdGhlcmUgYXJlIG1vcmUgdGhhbiAyMDAgcGFja2FnZXMgKGRlcGVuZHMgb24gYE1BWF9SRVNQT05TRV9JVEVNU2ApICgjOTIxOSk=-->fix: package cleanup rules are not applied when there are more than 200 packages (depends on `MAX_RESPONSE_ITEMS`) (#9219)<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9232
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9241
AssertExistsAndLoadBean has a side effect on its argument. When retrying in a loop, it must use the non modified argument, otherwise it is bound to return the same row as the first failure and render the retry useless.
Refs forgejo/forgejo#9236
---
Without this fix it fails 100% of the time locally on testify v1.11 because it runs the test before waiting https://github.com/stretchr/testify/pull/1427
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9242
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9202
After https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22385 introduced LFS GC, it never worked due to a bug in the INI library: fields in structs embedded more than one level deep are not populated from the INI file.
This PR fixes the issue by replacing the multi-level embedded struct with a single-level struct for parsing the cron.gc_lfs configuration.
Added a new test for retrieving cron settings to demonstrate the bug in the INI package.
---
Fix#9048 by cherrypicking the fix from Gitea
Gitea PR: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/35198
Confirmed to work on my own instance, I now see the cron schedule for gc_lfs listed in the site admin menu where it was empty before
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9202): <!--number 9202 --><!--line 0 --><!--description TEZTIEdDIGlzIG5ldmVyIHJ1bm5pbmcgYmVjYXVzZSBvZiBhIGJ1ZyBpbiB0aGUgcGFyc2luZyBvZiB0aGUgSU5JIGZpbGU=-->LFS GC is never running because of a bug in the parsing of the INI file<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Andrew Cassidy <drewcassidy@me.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9222
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [https://data.forgejo.org/infrastructure/next-digest](https://data.forgejo.org/infrastructure/next-digest) | action | minor | `v1.1.0` -> `v1.2.0` |
---
### Release Notes
<details>
<summary>infrastructure/next-digest (https://data.forgejo.org/infrastructure/next-digest)</summary>
### [`v1.2.0`](https://data.forgejo.org/infrastructure/next-digest/compare/v1.1.0...v1.2.0)
[Compare Source](https://data.forgejo.org/infrastructure/next-digest/compare/v1.1.0...v1.2.0)
</details>
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC), Automerge - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
---
This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0MS43Ni4wIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiNDEuNzYuMCIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6ImZvcmdlam8iLCJsYWJlbHMiOlsiZGVwZW5kZW5jeS11cGdyYWRlIiwidGVzdC9ub3QtbmVlZGVkIl19-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9157
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
(cherry picked from commit 7af04391a3)
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9071
All PUT/DELETE routes in the web UI are validated to prevent a [cross site request forgery](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-site_request_forgery). Although all POST routes are validated with a CSRF token, some of the PUT/DELETE routes were missing this validation.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Security bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9071): <!--number 9071 --><!--line 0 --><!--description dmFsaWRhdGUgQ1NSRiBvbiBub24tc2FmZSBtZXRob2Rz-->validate CSRF on non-safe methods<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9081
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
